Advertisement

Morphological and Phonological Analysis by Beginning Readers: Evidence from Serbian and Turkish

  • Anne Fowler
  • Laurie Beth Feldman
  • Darinka Andjelkovic
  • Banu Oney
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 22)

Abstract

Relative to the 25 years of intensive research demonstrating a central role for phonology in reading acquisition and skilled reading, efforts to understand the role of morphology are still at a preliminary stage. Ongoing research has focused on three main questions, each with clear parallels within the literature on phonology and reading.

Keywords

Phonological Awareness Poor Reader Morphological Awareness Phoneme Awareness Vocabulary Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, M. (1971). An English-Serbo-Croatian dictionary. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blachman, B. (1994) Early literacy acquisition: The role of phonological awareness. In G. P. Wallach and K.G. Butler (Eds.) Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents. New York: Merrill. pp. 253–274.Google Scholar
  4. Brady, S. A. (1997). Ability to encode phonological representations: A underlying difficulty of poor readers. In B. Blachman (Eds.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for intervention, (pp. 21–47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. (1997). The learnability of the alphabetic principle: Children’s initial hypotheses about how print represents spoken language. Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caramazza, A, Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 287–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L.B. Feldman (Ed). Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlisle, J. F. & Stone, C. A. (this volume). The effects of morphological structure on children’s reading of derived words in English.Google Scholar
  12. Chialant, D. & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In L.B. Feldman (Ed). Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Derwing, B., Smith, M. & Wiebe, G. (1995). On the role of spelling in morpheme recognition: Experimental studies with children and adults. In L.B. Feldman (Ed). Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 3–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Dunn, L. & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary. Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  15. Durgunoglu, A. & Öney, B. (1996). A cross linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition in Turkish and English. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Elbro, C. (1989). Morphological awareness in dyslexia. In C. von Euler (Ed.), Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series: Brain and Reading. Hampshire, England: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Elbro, C, & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, pp. 209–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, L. B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 442–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feldman, L.B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 442–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman, L. B., & Moskovljevic, J. (1987). Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fowler, A., & Liberman, I. (1995). Morphological awareness as related to early reading and spelling ability. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. (1977). The structure and acquisition of reading: Relation between orthography and the structured language. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading (pp. 1–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Gough, P.B., Ehri, L.C., & Treiman, R. (1992). Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographie stems. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leong, C. K., & Parkinson, M. E. (1995). Processing of English morphological structure by poor readers. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Developmental and Acquired Dyslexia: Neuropsychological and Neurolinguistic Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  26. Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A.M., Fowler, C. & Fischer, F.W. (1977). Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In A. Reber and D. Scarborough (Eds.). Toward a psychology of reading. (pp.207–226). Hillsdale, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.Google Scholar
  27. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mann, V. A. & Singson, M. (this volume). The little suffix that could: Linking morphological knowledge in English decoding ability.Google Scholar
  29. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L.K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McQueen, J. & Cutler, A. (1997). Morphology in word recognition. In A. M. Zwicky & A. Spencer (Eds.), The handbook of morphology. (pp. 406–427). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Nagy, W. & Anderson, R.C. (1984). How many words are there is printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R., Schommer, M., Scott, J.A. & Stallman, A. C. (1989). Morphological families and word recognition. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Öney, B. & Durgunoglu, A. (1997). Learning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics. 18, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raveh, M. and Feldman, L.B. (September, 1998). The contribution of morphological relation and affix position to morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew. Paper presented at the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  35. Rosner, J. & Simon, D.P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rubin, H. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability. Language and Speech, 31, 337–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rubin, H., Patterson, P. A., & Kantor, M. (1991). Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 22,228–235.Google Scholar
  38. Rueckl, J.G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C.S. & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, connectionist networks, and masked fragment completion. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A., Brady, S., Thornton, R., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L., Fletcher, J., Stuebing, K., Shaywitz, S., & Shaywitz, B. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 59–612.Google Scholar
  42. Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri, and R. Treiman (Eds.) Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. Tunmer, W. E., Herriman, M. L., & Nesdale, A. R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Underhill, R. (1976). Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., & Rashotte, C. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87. [cited p. 2]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Fowler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laurie Beth Feldman
  • Darinka Andjelkovic
  • Banu Oney
  1. 1.Wesleyan UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Haskins LaboratoriesNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations