Morpheme-Based Lexical Reading: Evidence from Pseudoword Naming

Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 22)


A large number of current models of word naming distinguish between a lexical routine, and a non-lexical (either extralexical or prelexical) routine for reading aloud (see, e.g., Coltheart & Rastle, 1994). According to these models, when the lexical pathway is involved, naming is based on whole-word processing and is obtained through a lexical lookup procedure. By contrast, when the non-lexical routine is activated, spoken output is the product of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion which is based on sublexical units, i.e. single graphemes or syllables, and is largely independent of lexical knowledge.


Lexical Decision Word Type Lexical Unit List Context Shallow Orthography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baayen, R.H. (1992). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In G.E. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer,pp. 109–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baayen, H., Burani, C, & Schreuder, R. (1997). Effects of semantic markedness in the processing of regular nominal singulars and plurals in Italian. In G.E. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1996. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Morphological composition in the lexical output system. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye-fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal ofMemoty and Language, 35, 801–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentin, S. & Feldman, L.B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to the repetition effect at long and short lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42(A), 693–711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Besner, D. & Smith, M.C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 468–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan, L. & Besner, D. (1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of a whole word non-semantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47,133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burani, C, Spuntarelli, A., & Arduino, L.S. (in preparation). How strong is morpheme-based access and naming: Evidence from pseudowords.Google Scholar
  9. Burani, C. & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burani, C, Dovetto, F.M., Spuntarelli, A., & Thornton, A.M. (1999). Morpho-lexical access and naming: The semantic interpretability of new root-suffix combinations. Brain and Language, 68, 333–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burani, C, Dovetto, F.M., Thornton, A.M., & Laudanna, A. (1997). Accessing and naming suffixed pseudo-words. In G.E. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology1996. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 55–72.Google Scholar
  12. Burani, C. & Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation of derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burani, C, Salmaso, D., & Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language, 4, 348–358.Google Scholar
  14. Burani, C. & Thornton, A.M. (in press). The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word properties in processing derived words. Linguistics Google Scholar
  15. Burani, C, Thornton, A.M., Iacobini, C, & Laudanna, A. (1995). Investigating morphological non-words. In W.U. Dressier & C. Burani (Eds.), Crossdisciplinary approaches to morphology. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
  16. Bybee, (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and cognitive processes, 10,425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Silveri, M.C, & Laudanna, A. (1985). Reading mechanisms and the organization of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chialant, D. & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In: L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Hove: Erlbaum, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar
  20. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C, & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coltheart, M. (1996). Phonological Dyslexia: Past and future issues. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 749–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, C, Jonasson, J., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dor-nic (Ed.), Attention and Performance II. New York: Academic, pp. 335–355.Google Scholar
  23. Coltheart, M. & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, HJ., & Schreuder, R.(1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition, 19, 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coslett, H.B. (1991). Read but not write “Idea”: Evidence for a third reading mechanism. Brain & Language, 40,425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Bastiani, P., Barry, C, & Carreras, M. (1987). Mechanisms for reading non-words: Evidence from a case of phonological dyslexia in an Italian reader. In: G. Denes, C. Semenza, & Bisiacchi, P. (Eds.), Perspectives on Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 253–267.Google Scholar
  27. Feldman, L.B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33,442–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frauenfelder, U.H. & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: the role of productivity. In G.E. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology199LDordrecht: Foris, pp. 165–183.Google Scholar
  29. Frost, R., Forster, K.I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 829–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Funneil, E. (1987). Morphological errors in acquired dyslexia: A case of mistaken identity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 497–539.Google Scholar
  31. James, C.T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1,130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Job, R. Peressotti, & Cusinato, A. (1998). Lexical effects in naming pseudowords in shallow orthographies: Further empirical data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 622–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Job, R., & Sartori, G. (1984). Morphological decomposition: Evidence from crossed phonological dyslexia. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 435–458.Google Scholar
  34. Laine, M. & Niemi, J. (1997). Reading morphemes. Aphasiology, 11, 9, 913–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., & Hyönä, J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymor-phemic nouns in a highly inflected language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 457–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laudanna, A. & Burani, C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: implications for processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Hove: Erlbaum, pp. 345–364.Google Scholar
  37. Laudanna, A., Burani, C, & Cermele, A. (1994). Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laudanna, A. & Caramazza, A. (1997). Orthographic and morphemic priming in written word recognition. Paper presented at the Joint Meeting AIP (Associazione Italiana di Psicologia)-EPS (Experimental Psychology Society), Cardiff, June.Google Scholar
  39. Laudanna, A., Cermele, A., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Morpho-lexical representations in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Libben, G. (1993). Are morphological structures computed during word recognition? Journal of Psycho-linguistic Research, 22, 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler K.L., Waksler R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101,3–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C.H., & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 452–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9,423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paap, K.R. & Noel, R.W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53,13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Panzeri, M., Semenza, C, Ferreri, T., & Butterworth, B. (1990). Free use of derivational morphology in an Italian jargonaphasic. In: J-L. Nespoulous & P. Villiard (Eds.), Morphology, Phonology, and Aphasia. New York: Springer, pp. 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patterson, K. & Marcel, A. (1992). Phonological ALEXIA or PHONOLOGICAL alexia? In: J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic Approaches to Human Cognition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 259–274.Google Scholar
  47. Sandra, D. (1994). Morphology in the reader’s mental lexicon. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  48. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R.H. (1994). Prefix stripping re-revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Hove: Erlbaum, pp. 131–154.Google Scholar
  50. Schwartz, M.F., Saffran, E.M., & Marin, O.S.M. (1980). Fractionating the reading process in dementia: Evidence for word-specific print-to-sound associations. In: M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J.C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep Dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 259–269.Google Scholar
  51. Sebastian-Gallés, N. (1991). Reading by analogy in a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17,471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1995). Semantic effects in single word-naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21,1140–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tabossi, P. & Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory and Cognition, 20, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263–272. Google Scholar
  55. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the Mental Lexicon. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taft, M. & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taft, M., Hambly, G., & Kinoshita, S. (1986). Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 351–366.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della CognizioneConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR)RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations