Advertisement

Extrahepatic Bile Ducts

Sarcomas and carcinoid tumors are not included
  • American Joint Committee on Cancer

Summary of Changes

The T and N classifications have been redefined and simplified.

Invasion of the subepithelial fibro (muscular) connective tissue is classified as T1 irrespective of muscular invasion, which cannot always be noted because of the scarcity of muscle fibers in some bile duct segments.

T2 is defined as invasion beyond the wall of the bile duct.

The T classification allows one to separate locally invasive tumors into resectable (T3) and unresectable (T4).

Invasion of branches of the portal vein (right or left), hepatic artery, or liver is classified as T3.

Invasion of the main portal vein, common hepatic artery, and/or regional organs is classified as T4.

The stage grouping has been changed to allow Stage III to signify locally unresectable disease and Stage IV to indicate metastatic disease.

Keywords

Bile Duct Small Cell Carcinoma Extrahepatic Bile Duct Bile Duct Cancer Bile Duct Carcinoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Albores-Saavedra J, Henson DE: Tumors of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. In Atlas of tumor pathology, 2nd series, fascicle 22, Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1986Google Scholar
  2. Albores-Saavedra J, Henson DE, Sobin LH: Histological typing of tumours of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. In WHO international histological classification of tumors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991Google Scholar
  3. Bhuiya MMR, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al: Clinicopathologic factors influencing survival of patients with bile duct carcinoma: multivariate statistical analysis. World J Surg 17:653, 1993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhuiya MMR, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al: Clinicopathologic studies on perineural invasion of bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 215:344–349, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braasch JW, Warren KW, Kune GA: Malignant neoplasms of the bile ducts. Surg Clin North Am 47:627–638, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Hochwald SN, et al: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system. Ann Surg 228:385–394, 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayashi S, Miyazaki M, Kondo Y, et al: Invasive growth patterns of hepatic hilar ductal carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 18 surgical cases. Cancer 73:2922–2929, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henson DE, Albores-Saavedra J, Code D: Carcinoma of the ex-trahepatic bile ducts: histologic types, stage of disease, grade and survival. Cancer 70:1498–1501, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong SM, Kang GH, Lee HY: Smooth muscle distribution in the extrahepatic bile duct: histologic and immunohisto-chemical studies of 122 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 24:660–667, 2000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Tsukioka Y, et al: Neural invasion and nodal involvement in distal bile duct cancer. Hepato-gastroenterology 41:190–194, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, et al: Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the distal bile duct based on a clinicopathologic study. Cancer 72:2112–2117, 1993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, et al: Improved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection. Ann Surg 230:663–671, 1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Longmire WP Jr, McArthur MS, Bastounis EA, et al: Carcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary tract. Ann Surg 178:333–345,1973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Sohn TA, et al: Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann Surg 224:463–475, 1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ogura Y, Takahashi K, Tabata M, et al: Clinicopathological study on carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct with special focus on cancer invasion on the surgical margins. World J Surg 18:778–784, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ouchi K, Suzuki M, Hashimoto L, et al: Histologic findings and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the upper bile duct. Am J Surg 157:552–556, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Suzuki M, Takahashi T, Ouchi K, et al: The development and extension of hepatohilar bile duct carcinoma: a three-dimensional tumor mapping in the intrahepatic biliary tree visualized with the aid of a graphics computer system. Cancer 64:658–666, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tamada K, Ido K, Ueno N, et al: Preoperative staging of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: comparison with pathological staging. Gastroenterology 100(pt 1):1351–1361, 1991Google Scholar
  19. Tio TL, Wijers OB, Sars PR, et al: Preoperative TNM classification of proximal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma by en-dosonography. Semin Liver Dis 10:114–120, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tompkins RK, Saunders K, Roslyn JJ, et al: Changing patterns in diagnosis and management of bile duct cancer. Ann Surg 211:613–620, 1990Google Scholar
  21. Tompkins RK, Thomas D, Wile A, et al: Prognostic factors in bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 194:447–455, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tsunodo T, Eto T, Koga M, et al: Early carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct. Jpn J Surg 19:691–698, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamaguchi K: Early bile duct carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 62:525–529, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • American Joint Committee on Cancer
    • 1
  1. 1.Executive OfficeChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations