Old and New Unsolved Problems in Lattice-Ordered Rings that need not be f-Rings

  • Melvin Henriksen
Part of the Developments in Mathematics book series (DEVM, volume 7)


Recall that a lattice-ordered ring or l-ring A(+, •, ∨, ∧) is a set together with four binary operations such that A(+, •) is a ring, A(∨, ∧) is a lattice, and letting P = {aA : a ∨ 0 = a{, we have both P + P and PP contained in P. For aA, we let a + = a ∨ 0, a - = (-a) and |a| = a ∨ (-a). It follows that a = a + - a -, |a| = a + + a -, and for any a, bA, |aa+b| < |a|+ |b| and |ab| < |a| |b|. As usual a < b means (b–a) ∈ P. We leave it to the reader to fill in what is meant by a lattice-ordered algebra over a totally ordered field.


Structure Space Division Algebra Division Ring Laurent Series Subdirect Product 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [AB85]
    C. Aliprantis and O. Burkinshaw, Positive Operators. (1985) Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [BP56]
    G. Birkhoff and R. S. Pierce, Lattice-ordered rings. Anais. Acad. Brasil Cien. 29 (1956), 41–69.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [CD69]
    P. Conrad and J. Dauns, An embedding theorem for lattice-ordered fields. Pacific J. Math. 30 (1969), 385–398.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [D89]
    J. Dauns, Lattice ordered division rings exist. Ord. Alg. Struct. (Curaçao, 1988), W. C. Holland & J. Martinez, (1989) Math. Appl. 55 Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 229–234.Google Scholar
  5. [FH88]
    D. Feldman and M. Henriksen, f-Rings, subdirect products of totally ordered rings, and the prime ideal theorem. Proc. Ned. Akad. Wetensh. 91 (1988), 121–126.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [H71]
    M. Henriksen, On difficulties in embedding lattice-ordered integral domains in lattice-ordered fields. General Topology and its Relations to Modern Analysis and Algebra III; Proceedings of the Third Prague Topological Symposium (1971), Academia, Prague; (1972) Academic Press, New York, 183–185.Google Scholar
  7. [H97]
    M. Henriksen, A survey of f-rings and some of their generalizations. Ord. Alg. Struct. (Curaçao, 1995), W. C. Holland & J. Martinez, (1997) Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1–26.Google Scholar
  8. [HK91]
    M. Henriksen and R. Kopperman, A general theory of structure spaces with applications to spaces of prime ideals. Alg. Universalis 28 (1991), 349–376.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [Ma01a]
    J. Ma, The quotient rings of a class of lattice-ordered Ore domains. Alg. Universalis, to appear.Google Scholar
  10. [Ma01b]
    J. Ma, Finite-dimensional algebras that do not admit a lattice order. Preprint.Google Scholar
  11. [Mc62]
    R. A. McHaffey, A proof that the quaternions do not form a lattice-ordered algebra. Proc. Iraqi Sci. Soc. 5 (1962), 70–71.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [MW01a]
    J. Ma and P. Wojciechowski, A proof of the Weinberg conjecture. Proc. AMS, to appear; (preprint available) .Google Scholar
  13. [MW01b]
    J. Ma and P. Wojciechowski, Lattice orders on matrix algebras. Submitted; (preprint available) .Google Scholar
  14. [MW02]
    J. Ma and P. Wojciechowski, Structure spaces of maximalℓ-ideals of latticeordered rings. In these Proceedings, 261–274.Google Scholar
  15. [P64]
    R. S. Pierce, Review of [Mc62.]. MR 27 (1964), #5706.Google Scholar
  16. [R89]
    R. Redfield, Constructing lattice-ordered fields and division rings. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 40 (1989), 365–369.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [R92]
    R. Redfield, Lattice-ordered fields as convolution algebras. J. Algebra 153 (1992), 319–356.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [R00]
    R. Redfield, Unexpected lattice-ordered quotient structures. Ordered Algebraic Structures; Nanjing (2001); Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. [R01]
    R. Redfield, Subfields of lattice-ordered fields that mimic maximal totally ordered subfields. Czech. Math J.. 51 (126) (2001), 143–161.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [S86]
    N. Schwartz, Lattice-ordered fields. Order 3 (1986), 179–194.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [St00]
    S. A. Steinberg, On the scarcity of lattice-ordered matrix algebras II. Proc. AMS 128 (2000), 1605–1612.Google Scholar
  22. [Su68]
    H. Subramanian, Kaplansky–s theorem for frings. Math. Annalen 179 (1968), 70–73.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [W66]
    E. Weinberg, On the scarcity of lattice-ordered matrix rings. Pacific J. Math. 19 (1966), 561–571.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [Wi76]
    R. R. Wilson, Lattice orderings on the real field. Pacific J. Math. 63 (1976), 571–577.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [Wi80]
    R. R. Wilson, Anti- f-rings. Ordered Groups (Proc. Conf., Boise State Univ., Boise, Idaho, 1978), Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 62 (1980), M. Dekker, New York, 47–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melvin Henriksen
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvey Mudd CollegeClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations