Asymmetric and Threshold Nonlinear Error-Correction Models

  • Gilles Dufrénot
  • Valérie Mignon


Models with asymmetric dynamics are important since they capture many stylized facts of modern economies. Typically, it is largely recognized that macroeconomic variables are subject to asymmetric dynamics for several reasons. Firstly, business cycles are asymmetric in nature (an old idea already suggested in Burns and Mitchell (1946) works) and this is illustrated by the fact that recessions last longer periods than expansions or recoveries. Secondly, asymmetries may come from microeconomic behavior as illustrated by partial adjustment models. For instance, costs of hiring and firing are asymmetric at the firm level. Thirdly, asymmetries can result from capital constraints on good markets. Fourthly, imperfect competition causes rigidities on credit, good and labor markets that affect the dynamics of the economy. All these phenomena have been extensively investigated in the literature, but the links between asymmetry and NEC models have been studied in only a few papers.


Unemployment Rate Business Cycle Forecast Error Inflation Rate Real Exchange Rate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balke, N.S. and T.B. Fomby (1997). “Threshold Cointegration”, International Economic Review 38, 627–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bec, F., Ben Salem, M. and R. McDonald (1999). “Real Exchange Rates and Real Interest Rates: A Nonlinear Perspective”, Working paper 99–17, THEMA, University of Paris X.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, A. and W.C. Mitchell (1946). Measuring Business Cycles. NBER, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Caroll, C.D. (1994). “How Does the Future Income Affect Consumption”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 111–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, K.S., Petrucelli, J.D., Tong, H. and S.W. Woolford (1985). “A Multiple Threshold AR(1) Model”, Journal of Applied Probability 22, 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. van Dijk, D. and P. Franses (1997). “Nonlinear Error-Correction Models for Interest Rates in the Netherlands”, Working paper, Tinbergen Institute, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. Dufrénot, G. and V. Mignon (2000). “Using Nonstationary Threshold Models to Study the Dynamics of Aggregate Consumption: the Case of France”, Working paper, ERUDITE, University of Paris 12.Google Scholar
  8. Dufrénot, G. and V. Mignon (2001). “Modelling the French Consumption using SETAR Models”, Working paper, ERUDITE, University of Paris 12.Google Scholar
  9. Dumas, B. (1992). “Dynamic Equilibrium and the Real Exchange Rate in a Spatially Separated World”, Review of Financial Studies 2, 153–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dynan, K.E. (1993). “How Prudent are Consumers”, Journal of Political Economy 101, 1104–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eliasson, A.C. (1999). “Detecting Equilibrium Correction with Smoothly Time-varying Strength”, Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  12. Ericsson, N.R. and D.F. Hendry (1991). “An Econometric Analysis of UK Money Demand in Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom by Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwarz”, American Economic Review 81, 8–38.Google Scholar
  13. Escribano, A. (1986). “Identification and Modelling of Economic Relationships in a Growing Economy”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  14. Escribano, A. (1997). “Nonlinear Error Correction: The Case of Money Demand in the UK (1870–1970)”, Working Paper, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.Google Scholar
  15. Escribano, A. and G. Pfann (1998). “Nonlinear Error-correction, Asymmetric Adjustment and Cointegration”, Economic Modelling 15, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Granger, C.W.J. and T.H. Lee (1989). “Investigation of Production, Sales and Inventory Relationships using Multicointegration and Non-symmetric Error Correction Models”, Journal of Applied Econometrics 4, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendry, D.F. and N. Ericsson (1991). “An Econometric Analysis of the UK Money Demand in ‘Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom’ by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz” in Monetary Trends in the United Kingdom, Bank of England Panel of Academic Consultants, Paper 22, 45–101.Google Scholar
  18. Kunst, R.M. (1992). “Dynamic Patterns in Interest Rates: Threshold Cointegration with ARCH”, Working paper, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.Google Scholar
  19. Kunst, R.M. (1995). “Determining Long-run Equilibrium Structures in Bivariate Threshold Autoregressions: a Multiple Decision Approach”, Working paper, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.Google Scholar
  20. Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P. and T. Teräsvirta (1988). “Testing Linearity Against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models”, Biometrika 75, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martens, M., Kofman, P. and T.C. Vorst (1998). “A Threshold Error-Correction Model for Intraday Futures and Index Returns”, Journal of Applied Econometrics 13, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michael, P., Nobay, R. and D. Peel (1994). “Purchasing Power Parity Yet Again: Evidence from Spatially Separated Commodity Markets”, Journal of International Money and Finance 13, 637–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nickell, S. (1985). “Error Correction, Partial Adjustment and All That: An Expository Note”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 47, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Obstfeld, M. and A. Taylor (1997). “Nonlinear Aspects of Goods-Markets Arbitrage and Adjustment: Heckscher’s Commodity Points Revisited”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 11, 441–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peel D.A. and J. Davidson (1998). “A Nonlinear Error Correction Mechanism Based on the Bilinear Model”, Economics Letters 58, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peel, D.A., Michael, P. and R. Nobay (1997). “Transaction Costs and Nonlinear Adjustment in Real Exchange Rates: An empirical Investigation”, Journal of Political Economy 105, 862–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pfann, D. (1996). “Factor Demand Models with Nonlinear Short-run Fluctuations”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pippenger, M.K. and G.E. Goering (1993). “A Note on the Empirical Power of Unit Root Tests under Threshold Processes”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 55, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarno, L. (1998). “Modelling Nonlinearity in The Demand for Money: Italy, 1861–1991”, Working paper, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  30. Stock, J. (1988). “Estimating Continuous Time Processes Subject to Time Deformation: An Application to Post War US GNP”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 77–85.Google Scholar
  31. Teräsvirta, T. and A.C. Eliasson (1998). “Nonlinear Error Correction and the UK Demand for Broad Money, 1878–1993”, Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilles Dufrénot
    • 1
    • 2
  • Valérie Mignon
    • 3
  1. 1.ERUDITEUniversity of Paris 12France
  2. 2.GREQUAM-CNRSUniversity of MarseilleFrance
  3. 3.MODEMUniversity of Paris 10France

Personalised recommendations