Advertisement

Open Market Shocks in a Business Cycle Model with Financial Intermediation

  • Burkhard Heer
  • Andreas Schabert
Chapter

Abstract

This paper presents a business cycle analysis of monetary policy shocks measured by disturbances to open market operations, i. e. the ratio of bonds to reserves. We develop a dynamic general equilibrium model with financial intermediation and staggered prices. In accordance with empirical evidence, a monetary tightening leads to a fall in output, monetary aggregates, and factor prices. In contrast to an alternative model specification with money growth shocks, our model with disturbances to open market operations generates a persistent decline in output as well as a rise of nominal and real interest rates on bonds in response to a monetary contraction. In addition, the model’s ability to replicate second moments of empirical time series is superior to the one of a model with a money growth shock.

Keywords

Monetary Policy Business Cycle Nominal Interest Rate Monetary Authority Monetary Aggregate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benhabib, J., Schmidt-Grohe, S., and M. Uribc (2001). Monetary policy and multiple equilibria. American Economic Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  2. Calvo, G. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12:383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chari, V.V., L.J. Christiano, and M. Eichenbaum (1995). Inside money, outside money, and short-term interest rates. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27:1354–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chari, V.V., P.J. Kehoe, and E.R. McGrattan (1996). Sticky price models of the business cycle: can the contract multiplier solve the persistence problem? Research Department Staff Report 217, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  5. Cho, J.-O., and T. Cooley (1995). The business cycle with nominal contracts. Economic Theory, 6:13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christiano, J.L., and M. Eichenbaum (1992). Liquidity effects and the monetary transmission mechanism. American Economic Review, 82:346–53.Google Scholar
  7. Christiano, J.L., M. Eichenbaum, and C.L. Evans (1997a). Sticky price and limited participation models of money: a comparison. European Economic Review, 41:1201–49.Google Scholar
  8. Christiano, J.L., M. Eichenbaum, and C.L. Evans (1997b). Modeling money, paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Economic Dynamics, Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. Christiano, J.L., M. Eichenbaum, and C.L. Evans (1999). Monetary Policy Shocks: What Have We Learned and to What End? In M. Woodford and J.B. Taylor (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  10. Christiano, J.L., and G. Gust (1999). Taylor Rules in a Limited Participation Model. In Monetary Policy Rules, edited by J.B. Taylor, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clarida, R., J. Gali, and M. Gertler (2000). Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140:147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooley, T.F., and G.D. Hansen (1989). The inflation tax in a real business cycle model. American Economic Review, 79:733–48.Google Scholar
  13. Cooley, T.F., and G.D. Hansen (1995). Money and the Business Cycle. In Cooley, T.F. (ed.), Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 175–216.Google Scholar
  14. Cooley, T.F., and G.D. Hansen (1998). The role of monetary shocks in equilibrium business cycle theory: three examples. European Economic Review, 42:605–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corriera, I., J. Neves, and S. Rebelo (1995). Business cycles in a small open economy. European Economic Review, 34:1275–1301.Google Scholar
  16. Fuerst, T.S. (1992). Liquidity, loanable funds, and real activity. Journal of Monetary Economics, 29:3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hairault, J. and Portier, F. (1993). Money, new-Keynesian macroeconomics and the business cycle. European Economic Review, 37:1533–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heer, B., and A. Schabert (2000). Open market operations as a monetary policy shock measure in a quantitative business cycle model. CESifo working paper No. 396.Google Scholar
  19. Jeanne, O. (1998). Generating real persistent effects of monetary policy: how much nominal rigidity do we really need? European Economic Review, 42:1009–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. King, R.G., C. Plossser, and S. Rebelo (1987). Production growth and the business cycle: Technical Appendix. Working paper, University of Rochester, revised 1990.Google Scholar
  21. Leeper, E.M. (1991). Equilibria under ‘active’ and ‘passive’ monetary and fiscal policies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27:129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1990). Liquidity and interest rates. Journal of Economic Theory, 50:237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lucas, R.E. Jr., and N.L. Stokey (1987). Money and interest in a cash-in-advance economy. Econometrica, 55:491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rotemberg, J. (1996). Prices, output and hours: an empirical analysis based on a sticky price model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27:505–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rotemberg, J., and M. Woodford (1998). Interest rate rules in an estimated sticky price model. NBER Working Paper, no. 6618.Google Scholar
  26. Schreft, S., and B.D. Smith (1998). The effects of open market operations in a model of intermediation and growth. Review of Economic Studies, 65:519–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schreft, S.L., and B.D. Smith (2000). The evolution of cash transactions: some implications for monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46:97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor, J.B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference series on Public Policy, 39:195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yun, Tack (1996). Nominal price rigidity, money supply endogeneity, and business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37:345–370.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Burkhard Heer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andreas Schabert
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Public EconomicsUniversity of InnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.CESifoGermany
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CologneGermany

Personalised recommendations