Advertisement

Crosstalk in Optically Pre-Amplified Systems

  • Idelfonso Tafur Monroy
  • Eduward Tangdiongga
Chapter
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 678)

Abstract

Optical receivers used in multi-wavelength optical networks are often preceded by an optical amplifier for the increase of receiver sensitivity, and thereby extending the transmission reach. However, the destructive effects of interfero-metric crosstalk as a result of leaking signals in a switching node are intensified by the presence of residual amplified spontaneous emission noise in the optical amplifiers. Transmission links using direct and external modulation light sources are investigated and the results show that optical pre-amplification indeed increases the receiver sensitivity but unfortunately at the expense of the network’s tolerance towards in-band crosstalk.

Keywords

Semiconductor Optical Amplifier Amplify Spontaneous Emission Moment Generate Function Optical Amplifier Optical Gain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E. Tangdiongga, H. de Waardt, and C. G. P. Herben, “Performance of Optically Preampli-fied Receivers Detecting Signals Interfered by Homowavelength Crosstalk,” Micro, and Optic. Technol. Lett., vol. 20, pp. 225–229, Feb. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    I. Tafur Monroy, E. Tangdiongga, and H. de Waardt, “Performance of Optically Pream-plifled Receivers in WDM Systems Disturbed by Interferometric Crosstalk,” Photon. Network Comm., vol. 1, pp. 313–322, Dec. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. J. Mears, L. Reekie, I. M. Jauncey, and D. N. Payne, “Low-Noise Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier Operating at 1.5m,” Electron. Lett., vol. 23, pp. 1026–1028, Sept. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Y. Sun, J. W. Sulhoff, A. K. Srivastava, A. Abramov, T. A. Strasser, P. F. Wysocki, J. R. Pedrazzani, J. B. Judkins, R. P. Espindola, C. Wolf, J. L. Zyskind, A. M. Vengsarkar, and J. Zhou, “A Gain-Flattened Ultra Wide Band EDFA for High Capacity WDM Optical Communication Systems,” in Proc. 24th European Conf. on Optical Comm. (ECOC’98), vol. 1, pp. 53–54, Madrid-Spain, Sept. 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. Yamada, Y. Shibata, T. Okugawa, and K. Habara, “Tolerance for Optical Coherent Crosstalk of a Novel Manchester-Code Receiver,” in Proc. 24th European Conf. on Optical Comm. (ECOC’98), vol. 1, pp. 61–62, Madrid-Spain, Sept. 1998.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Mori, M. Yamada, Y Ohishi, and M. Shimizu, “Ultra-Broadband Amplification for DWDM Systems” in Proc. 25th European Conf. on Optical Comm. (ECOC99), vol. 1, pp. 260–263, Nice-France, Sept. 1999.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. de Waardt, High Capacity 1300 Nanometer Optical Transmission. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, Sept. 1995. ISBN 90–72125–54–1.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. H. Spiekman, J. M. Wiesenfeld, A. H. Gnauck, L. D. Garret, G. N. van den Hoven, T. van Dongen, M. J. H. Sander-Jochem, and J. J. M. Binsma, “8 × 10 Gb/s DWDM Transmission over 240 km of Standard Fiber using a Cascade of Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 1082–1084, Aug. 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Durhuus, B. Mikkelsen, C. Joergensen, S. L. Danielsen, and K. E. Stubkjaer, “All-Optical Wavelength Conversion by Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol, vol. 14, pp. 942–954, June 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Nesset, T. Kelly, and D. Marcenac, “All-Optical Wavelength Conversion using SOA Nonlinearities,” IEEE Comm. Magazine, vol. 36, pp. 56–61, Dec. 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Renaud, M. Bachmann, and M. Erman, “Semiconductor Optical Space Switches,” IEEE J. Select. Topics in Quantum Electron., vol. 2, pp. 277–288, June 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. P. Kanjamala and A. F. J. Levi, “Wavelength Selective Electro-Optic Flip-Flop,” Elec¬tron. Lett., vol. 34, pp. 299–300, Feb. 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. C. Simon, L. Billes, A. Dupas, B. Kowalski, M. Henry, and B. Landousies, “All-Optical Regeneration,” in Proc. 24th European Conf. on Optical Comm. (ECOC’98), vol. 1, pp. 467–468, Madrid-Spain, Sept. 1998.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. G. L. Jennen, R. C. J. Smets, H. de Waardt, G. N. van den Hoven, and A. J. Boot, “4 x 10 Gbit/s NRZ Transmission in the 1310 nm Window over 80 km of Standard Single Mode Fiber using Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers,” in Proc. 24th European Conf. on Optical Comm. (ECOC’98), vol. 1, pp. 235–236, Madrid-Spain, Sept. 1998.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. Banerjee, A. K. Srivastava, B. R. Eichenbaum, C. Wolf, Y. Sun, J. W. Sulhoff, and A. R. Chraplyvy, “Polarization Multiplexing Technique to Mitigate WDM Crosstalk in SOAs,” in Proc. 25th European Conf. on Optical Comm. (ECOC’99), vol. PD, pp. 62–63, Nice-France, Sept. 1999.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Y. Sun, A. K. Srivastava, S. Banerjee, J. W. Sulhoff, R. Pan, K. Kantor, R. M. Jopson, and A. R. Chraplyvy, “Error-free Transmission of 32 x 2.5 Gbit/s DWDM Channels over 125 km using Cascaded Inline Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers,” Electron. Lett., vol. 33, pp. 1863–1865, Oct. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. P. Blondel, F. Boubal, E. Brandon, L. Buet, L. Labrunie, P. le Roux, and D. Toullier, “Network Application and System Demonstration of WDM Systems with very Large Spans,” in Proc. Conf. on Optical Fiber Communication (OFC2000), vol. 4, pp. 260–262, Baltimore-Maryland, Mar. 2000.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    L. F. B. Ribeiro, J. R. F. da Rocha, and J. L. Pinto, “Performance Evaluation of EDFA Preamplified Receivers Taking into Account Intersymbol Interference,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 13, pp. 225–232, Feb. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    N. A. Olsson, “Lightwave Systems with Optical Amplifiers,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 7, pp. 1071–1082, July 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    G. Einarsson, Principles of Lightwave Communications. Chichester: John & Wiley, 1996. ISBN 0–471–95298–2.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    C. W. Helstrom, “Performance Analysis of Optical Receivers by the Saddlepoint Approx¬imation,” IEEE Trans, on Comm., vol. 27, pp. 186–191, Jan. 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    C. R. Gilles and E. Desurvire, “Propagation of Signal and Noise in Concatenated Erbium-Doped Fiber Optical Amplifiers,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol, vol. 9, pp. 147–154, Feb. 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Idelfonso Tafur Monroy
    • 1
  • Eduward Tangdiongga
    • 1
  1. 1.COBRA InstituteEindhoven University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations