Ordering Risky Choices
This chapter connects assumptions about probability distributions, decision makers’ risk attitudes, and the resulting methods used to order risky choices. The methods we discuss are consistent with the expected utility hypothesis because up to this point in time no alternative for decision making under risk has gained widespread acceptance.
KeywordsDecision Maker Risk Attitude Risk Preference Stochastic Dominance Weak Assumption
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hadar, J., and W.R. Russell. 1969. “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” American Economic Review 59: 25–34.Google Scholar
- Meyer, D.J., and J. Meyer. 2001. “Habit Formation Utility, the Equity Premium Puzzle, and Risk Preferences in Multi-Period Consumption Models.” Draft Working Paper (January).Google Scholar
- Meyer, J. 1987. “Two Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization.” American Economic Review 77: 421–430.Google Scholar
- Robison, L.J., and P.J. Barry. 1987. The Competitive Firm’s Response to Risk. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
- Sinn, H.-W. 1983. Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty. New York: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar