Advertisement

Common Architectures for TD-CDMA and OFDM Based Mobile Radio Systems Without the Necessity of a Cyclic Prefix

  • C. Vincent Sinn
  • Jürgen Götze
  • Martin Haardt

Abstract

In this article an OFDM system without the necessity of a cyclic prefix is presented. First a generalised data model that describes different mobile radio systems by a set of parameters is developed. That model is taken as a basis to perform data detection general enough to be applicable in different mobile radio systems. The differences and similarities of different systems with regard to the data model are elaborated. It comes out that in order to enable common detection strategies the cyclic prefix in OFDM based systems can be discarded, which implies that the information data rate is increased. The price is a higher computational requirement of the receiver. Following the desire not to increase the computational requirements for data detection significantly a technique is found to perform data detection in OFDM systems without cyclic prefix causing only a moderate increase in computational requirements.

Keywords

Minimum Mean Square Error Computational Requirement Cyclic Prefix Data Symbol Data Detection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ETSI, “Broadband Radio Access Networks (BRAN), HIPERLAN Type 2, Physical (PHY) layer,” Technical Specification ETSI TS 101 475, V. 1. 2. 1, November 2000.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. H. Golub and C. F. van Loan, “Matrix Computations,” The John Hopkins’University Press, third edition, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Hara and R. Prasad, “Overview of Multicarrier CDMA,” IEEE Communications Magazine, December 1997.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. van Nee and R. Prasad, “OFDM for wireless multimedia communications,” Artech House Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. Sari, “Orthogonal frequency division multiple access with frequency hopping and diversity,” in Proc. MCSS, 1997, pp. 57–68.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Verdu, “Multiuser Detection,” Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Vollmer, J. Götze and M. Haardt, “Joint-Detection using Fast Fourier Transforms in TDCDMA based Mobile Radio Systems,” International Conference on Telecommunications, ICT ‘89, Cheju, Korea, 1999Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Vollmer, M. Haardt and J. Götze, “Comparative Study of Joint-Detection Techniques for TDCDMA based Mobile Radio Systems,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. (accepted).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Vollmer, “Programmes for computing computational requirements of four JD algorithms,” available online at http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/mitarbeiter/mvo/compreq.html Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Z. Wang and G. B. Giannakis, “Wireless Multicarrier Communications,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 29–48, May 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    W. Zou and Y. Wu, “COFDM: An overview,” IEEE Trans. Broadcasting, vol. 41, no. 1, Mar. 1995Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Vincent Sinn
    • 1
  • Jürgen Götze
    • 1
  • Martin Haardt
    • 2
  1. 1.Information Processing LabUniversity of DortmundDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Communication Research LabIlmenau University of TechnologyIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations