Toward a Unified Foundation for Simulation-Based Acquisition

  • H. S. Sarjoughian
  • F. E. Cellier


Simulation-Based Acquisition (SBA) has become an important framework for the development of engineering systems of high complexity. It offers a rapid prototyping capability for the design and/or evaluation of engineering systems, the components of which are by themselves complex systems that may be manufactured by different vendors. Using SBA, the designers of such Systems of Systems can verify that the interplay between the component systems functions correctly and reliably. The paper stipulates that SBA is enabled by the synergism of three technologies, namely Modeling & Simulation (M&S), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Software Engineering (SE).


Software Engineer Architectural Framework Unify Foundation Artificial Intelligence Community Terminal Variable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Andrews, G.R., Concurrent Programming: Principles and Practices, 1991, Redwood City, CA, Benjamin/Cummings, xvii+637.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Arizona Center for Integrative Modeling and Simulation, Software Tools,, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Braham, R. and R. Comerford, Sharing Virtual Wolds. IEEE Spectrum, 1997, 34(3), p. 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Booch, G., Object-Oriented Design with Applications, 1994, Redwood City, CA, Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cellier, F.E., Combined Continuous/Discrete System Simulation by Use of Digital Computers: Techniques and Tools, 1979, ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cellier, F.E., Continuous System Modeling, 1991, Springer Verlag, xxvii + 755.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cloud, D.J. and L.B. Rainey, Applied Modeling and Simulation: An Integrated Approach to Development and Operation, Space Technology Series, 1998, McGraw Hill. xviii + 712.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cutkosky, M.R., et al., PACT: An Experiment in Integrating Concurrent Engineering Systems, IEEE Computer, 1993, 26(1), p. 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    DMSO, Runtime Infrastructure,, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    DoD-5000.1, DoD 5000.1, Defense Acquisition, 1996, U.S. Department of DefenseGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Elmqvist, H., Structured Model Language for Large Continuous Systems, 1978, Lund Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Elmqvist, H., F.E. Cellier, and M. Otter. Object-oriented modeling of hybrid systems, in Proceedings of European Simulation Symposium, 1993, Society for Computer Simulation.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Emmerich, W., Engineering Distributed Objects, 2000, John Wiley & Sons. xv + 371.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Fishwick, P.A., Simulation Model Design and Execution: Building Digital Worlds, 1995, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Genesereth, M., N.J. Nilsson, Logical Foundation of Artificial Intelligence, 1987, San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kufmann, xviii + 405.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Giambiasi, N., B. Escude, and S. Ghosh, GDEVS: A Generalized Discrete Event Specification for Accurate Modeling of Dynamic Systems, SCS Transactions, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ho, Y.C., Special Issue on Discrete Event Dynamic System, IEEE Proceedings, 1989.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Hofstadter, D.R., Godel, Escher, Bach: An Ethernal Golden Braid, 1979, Vintage Books Edition, May 1989, xxi + 777.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Javasoft, Java Technology,, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Modelica,, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    OMG, CORBA/IIOP 2.2 Specification,, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Orfali, R., et al., The Essential Distributed Objects Survival Guide, 1995, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Praehofer, Systems Theoretic Foundations for Combined Discrete Continuous System Simulation, in Institute of Systems Science, Department of Systems Theory and Information Engineering, 1991, Johannes Kepler University.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Sarjoughian, H.S. and B.P. Zeigler, DEVS and HLA: Complementary Paradigms for M&S. Transactions of Society for Computer Simulation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 187–197, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    SBA, Simulation Based Acquisition: A New Approach, 1998, Defense Systems Management College, Report of the Military Research Fellows DSMC.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    SEI, Software Engineering Institute,, 2000.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Sorid, D. and S.K. Moore, The Virtual Surgeon, IEEE Spectrum, 2000, 37(7), p. 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    UML, Unified Modeling Language,, 2000.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Wymore, W., Model-based Systems Engineering: An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Discrete Systems and to the Tricotyledon Theory of System Design, 1993, Boca Raton, CRC.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Zeigler, B.P., Toward A Formal Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Structure Preserving Morphisms, Communications of the ACM, 1972, 19(4), p. 742–746.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Zeigler, B.P., H.S. Sarjoughian, and S. Vahie, An Architecture For Collaborative Modeling and Simulation, in 11th European Simulation Multiconference, 1997, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Zeigler, B.P., H. Praehofer, and T.G. Kim, Theory of Modeling and Simulation. Second Edition, 2000, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Zeigler, B.P., H.S. Sarjoughian, and H. Praehofer, Theory of Quantized Systems: DEVS Simulation of Perceiving Agents, Cybernetics and Systems, 2000, 31(6), p. 611–647.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. S. Sarjoughian
  • F. E. Cellier

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations