Mode-Coupling Effects in Acoustic Thermometry of the Arctic Ocean

  • Alexander N. Gavrilov
  • Peter N. Mikhalevsky
Chapter

Abstract

The effects of mode coupling on modal travel times and amplitudes are considered with respect to the robustness and accuracy of acoustic thermometry in a range-dependent ocean waveguide. An approximate analytic solution for the complex amplitudes of coupled modes in a slowly varying waveguide is used to analyze the character of mode coupling effects. Change in the source-receiver transfer function for individual modes, due to the mode coupling, is discussed. It is shown that the variations of the modal travel times measured by the modal phases are much less sensitive to the mode coupling than those measured by locating the modal arrival time in pulse-like signals. The numerical solution of the coupled-mode problem has been used to model broadband acoustic propagation at 20 Hz over 1200 km from a source northwest of Franz Josef Land to a receiver in the Lincoln Sea, crossing the Eurasian continental slope, the deep-water Arctic Basin, and the Canadian continental slope. Year-round acoustic measurements are currently being made on this path as part of the Arctic Climate Observations using Underwater Sound (ACOUS) experiment that started in October 1998. The results of modeling show that the mode coupling limits the accuracy of acoustic thermometry on this path. However this limit should not exceed 5 millidegree C for integrated temperature changes on this path if the acoustic travel time variations are measured using the modal phase. Variations of the modal amplitudes due to mode coupling are examined using the results of the Transarctic Acoustic Propagation (TAP) experiment in 1994.

Keywords

Attenuation Propa Refraction Acoustics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [ACA96]
    Arctic Climatology Atlas, on CD-ROM: AARI, St. Petersburg, http://ns.noaa.gov/atlas/, 1996.
  2. [A0F71]
    Arctic Ocean Floor (chart). (C. Bruce and T. Marie (ed.)), National Geographic Society, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. [AOW83]
    Arctic Ocean of World Ocean Atlas, Vol. III (S.G. Gorshkov, (ed.)), Pergamon, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. [BAZ94]
    S.V. Brestkin, E.O. Akseonov, and V.F. Zakharov. Statistical characteristics of the bottom profile of the Arctic ice cover. Tech. Rep. 94/3, AcoustInform, Moscow, Russia, May 1994.Google Scholar
  5. [BG]
    L.M. Brekhovskikh and O.A. Godin. Acoustics of Layered Media, 2: Point Sources and Bounded Beams. Springer Series on Wave Phenomena, Vol. 10. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. [BM92]
    R.H. Bourke and A.S. McLaren. Contour mapping of Arctic Basin ice draft and roughness parameters. J. Geophys. Res., 97(C11): 17715–17728, 1992.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [CML96]
    C-S. Chiu, J.H. Miller, and J.F. Lynch. Forward coupled-mode propagation modeling for coastal acoustic tomography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99:793–802, 1996.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [DCM86]
    Y. Desaubies, C.-S. Chiu, and J.H. Miller. Acoustic mode propagation in a range-dependent ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 80:1148–1160, 1986.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [Ev83]
    R.B. Evans. A coupled mode solution for acoustic propagation in a waveguide with stepwise depth variations of a penetrable bottom. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 74:188–195, 1983.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [Fa92]
    J.A. Fawcett. A derivation of the differential equations of coupled-mode propagation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 92:290–295, 1992.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [GA96]
    A.N. Gavrilov and M.Yu. Andreyev. Analysis of the results of the Transarctic Acoustic Propagation experiment. Tech. Rep. No. 2/96, Marine Science Int. Corp., North Falmouth, MA, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. [GA+96]
    A.N. Gavrilov and M.Yu. Andreyev. New results of the TAP experiment data analysis. In Tech. Rep. “Large scale variations in the Arctic Ocean and the acoustic monitoring scheme optimal for observations of climatic changes,” A.N. Gavrilov (ed.). Tech. Rep. No. 5/96, Marine Science Int. Corp., North Falmouth, MA, pp. 24–32, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. [Ge90]
    W.H. Geddes. Geoacoustic model of the Lincoln Sea. GGAI Tech.Rep. 3–90, March 1990.Google Scholar
  14. [GK94]
    A.N. Gavrilov and V.N. Kudryashov. Numerical modeling of low-frequency sound propagation in a horizontally stratified Arctic waveguide. Tech. Rep. 94/1, AcoustInform, Moscow, Russia, January 1994.Google Scholar
  15. [GM95]
    A.N. Gavrilov and P.N. Mikhalevsky. Modeling an acoustic response to long-term variations of water and ice characteristics in the Arctic Ocean, in Proceedings of Oceans ’95 IEEE Conf., San Diego, CA, Vol. 1, pp. 247–253, June 1995.Google Scholar
  16. [JLCM96]
    G. Jin, J.F. Lynch, C.-S. Chiu, and J.H. Miller. A theoretical and simulation study of acoustic normal mode coupling effects due to the Barents Sea Polar Front, with application to acoustic tomography and match field processing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 100:193–206, 1996.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [Ku96]
    V.M. Kudryashov. Calculation of the acoustic field in an Arctic waveguide. Phys. Acoust. 42:386–389, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. [MBGS95]
    P.N. Mikhalevsky, A.B. Baggeroer, A.N. Gavrilov, and M.M. Slavinsky. Experiment tests use of acoustics to monitor temperature and ice in Arctic Ocean. EOS, 6(27):265–269, 1995.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [McD82]
    S.T. McDaniel, Mode coupling due to interaction with the seabed. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 72:916–923, 1982.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [MGB99]
    P.N. Mikhalevsky, A.N. Gavrilov, and A.B. Baggeroer. The transarctic acoustic propagation experiment and climate monitoring in the Arctic. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 24(2): 183–201, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [ML94]
    F.J. Millero and X. Li. Comments on “On equations for the speed of sound in sea water.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95:2757–2759, 1994.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [MF89]
    W. Munk and A.M.G. Forbes. Global ocean warming: An acoustic measure. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 19:1765–1778, 1989.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [PFS096]
    R. Pawlowicz, D. Farmer, B. Sotirin, and S. Ozard. Shallow-water receptions from the transarctic acoustic propagation experiment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 100:1482–1492, 1996.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [Po91]
    M.B. Porter. The KRAKEN normal mode program. Tech. Rep., SACLANT Undersea Research Center Mem. (SM-245)/ NRL Mem. Rep. 6920, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. [Sh89]
    E. C. Shang. Ocean acoustic tomography based on adiabatic mode theory. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 85:1531–1537, 1989.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander N. Gavrilov
  • Peter N. Mikhalevsky

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations