Advertisement

Surgery and Trauma

  • Mark H. Ebell
Chapter

Keywords

Prediction Rule Glasgow Coma Score Seat Belt Validation Group Pretest Probability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Grewal M, Sutcliffe AJ. Early prediction of outcome following head injury in children: an assessment of the value of Glasgow Coma Scale score trend and abnormal plantar and pupillary light refleces. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 1161–1163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Graf WD, Cummings P, Quan L, Brutocao D. Predicting outcome in pediatric submersion victims. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26: 312–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lichtenstein MJ, Bolton A, Wade G. Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for predicting seat belt utilization. J Fam Pract 1989; 28: 289–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxt WG, Jones G, Fortlage D. The Trauma Triage Rule: a new, resource-based approach to the prehospital identification of major trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19: 1401–1406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Emerman C, Shade B, Kubincanek J. Comparative performance of the Baxt Trauma Triage Rule. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10: 294–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Emerman C, Shade B, Kubincanek J. Comparative performance of the Baxt Trauma Triage Rule. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10: 294–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Koehler JJ, Baer L, Malafa S, et al. Prehospital index: a scoring system for field triage of trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15: 178–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benzer A, Mitterschiffthaler G, Marosi M, et al. Prediction of non-survival after trauma: Innsbruck Coma Scale. Lancet 1991; 338: 977–978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mellors JW, Kelly JJ, Gusberg RJ, Horwitz SM, Horwitz RI. A simple index to estimate the likelihood of bacterial infection in patients developing fever after abdominal surgery. Am Surg 1988; 54: 558–564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Billing A, Frohlich D, Schildberg FW, Peritonitis Study Group. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 209–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosscha K, Reijders K, Hulstaert F, Algra A, van der Werken C. Prognosic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra-abdominal sepsis. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1532–1534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pusajo JF, Bumaschny E, Doglio GR, et al. Postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis requiring reoperation: value of a predictive index. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 218–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark H. Ebell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations