Skip to main content

Male Circumcision in South Korea

History, Statistics, and the Role of Doctors in Creating a Circumcision Rate of Over 100%

  • Chapter
Understanding Circumcision

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine thoroughly the history of South Korean male circumcision and to investigate the factors contributing to the present unusual situation. We surveyed 5,434 South Korean males between the ages of 0 and 92 years regarding their circumcision status, the age at circumcision, and the possible effect of circumcision on their sexuality. In addition, we interviewed 267 practicing medical doctors on their basic understanding regarding circumcision as well as their own circumcision status and history. The circumcision rate in the year 1945 was less than 0.1%. At present, the circumcision rate for high school boys exceeds 90%, and for 80 year olds it is less than 5%. When averaged over the whole population, the present South Korean circumcision rate is about 60%. The circumcision rate increased dramatically over the years and, particularly in the past 20 years, the estimated number of male circumcisions performed has far exceeded the number of male births. Although circumcision in South Korea is not of a religious nature and has been strongly influenced by Americans, it has never been predominantly neonatal. The circumcision age has continued to decrease, and boys are now circumcised at around age 12. Forty-one percent of polled doctors circumcise, but, unlike the United States, gynecologists and pediatricians rarely circumcise. Doctors’ basic knowledge about circumcision is generally lacking, regardless of whether they practice circumcision or not. There exist many interesting misunderstandings among doctors and the general public regarding circumcision’s cultural and geographical aspects, and its correlations with general prosperity and medical advancement. We have documented the unusual history of circumcision in South Korea from the very beginning. The present situation has been created through combinations of many factors. Chief among the contributing factors is the mistaken notion held by both doctors and the general public that circumcision is directly correlated with industrialization and general progress of living standards. Many doctors believe in out-dated and sometimes controversial benefits for circumcision: for instance, prevention of cervical cancer. Not surprisingly, with these beliefs, the vast majority of doctors have recommended circumcision regardless of patient’s age or penile condition. Since millions of Korean males were circumcised long after they had been sexually active, South Korea offers a unique opportunity to study the effect of circumcision on sexuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Department of Health Statistics, UK 1990–1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shannon FT, Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM. Infant circumcision. New Zealand Med J 1979;90:283. Ken McGrath and Hugh Young, private communications.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim DS, Lee JY, Pang MG. Male circumcision: a South Korean perspective. BJU Int 1999;83(Suppl 1):28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Genesis 17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.nso.go.kr

  6. Holman JR, Stuessi KA. Adult circumcision. Am Fam Physician 1999:59:1514–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman EW. Circumcision in the United States. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stang HJ, Snellman LW. Circumcision practice patterns in United States. Pediatrics 1998; 101:E5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frisch M, Friis S, Kruger Kjaer S, Melbye M. Falling incidence of penile cancer in a uncircumcised population (Denmark 1943–90). Br Med J 1995;311:1471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rickwood A.M, Hemalatha V, Batcup G, Spitz L. Phimosis in boys. Br J Urol 1980;52:147–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Øster J. The further fate of the foreskin. Arch Dis Child 1968;43:200–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rickwood AMK. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83 (Suppl 1):45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lannon CM. Bailey AGD, Fleischman AR, Kaplan GW, Shoemaker CT, Swanson JT, Coustan D. Circumcision policy statement Pediatrics 1999;103:683–93.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shingleton H, Heath CW Jr. Position of the American Cancer Society, 16 February 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fischbacher CM. Circumcision of newborn boys. Lancet 1999;353:669–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Howe RS, Cold CJ. Circumcision of newborn boys. Lancet 1999;353:670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalton JD. Circumcision of newborn boys. Lancet 1999;353:670.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Halperin DT, Bailey RC. Male Circumcision and HIV infection: 10 years and counting. Lancet 1999;354:1813.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. South Korean Department of Environment, 21 February 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goldman R. The psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83 (Suppl 1):93–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pang, MG., Kim, S.C., Kim, D. (2001). Male Circumcision in South Korea. In: Denniston, G.C., Hodges, F.M., Milos, M.F. (eds) Understanding Circumcision. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3375-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3351-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics