The Compulsion to Circumcise is Constant
Routine non-ritual circumcision stands alone as an allegedly prophylactic procedure that is carried out on an enormous scale for the eventual benefit of only a small minority. Arguments in favor of this procedure have varied with time. They have included prevention of penile cancer, prevention of cervical cancer in sexual partners, and more recently prevention of urinary tract infections in infants and young boys, prevention of AIDS, and cost savings. Yet, no proper epidemiological evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio has been carried out. Instead the arguments have been largely polemical. These will be reviewed and available data assessed.
KeywordsCervical Cancer Urinary Tract Infection Sexual Partner Male Circumcision Penile Cancer
- 1.Ricketts BM. Circumcision: the last fifty of two hundred circumcisions. New York Medical Journal 1894;58:431–2.Google Scholar
- 5.Spence J. Spence on circumcision. Lancet 1964;2(7365):902. [24 October 1964]Google Scholar
- 6.Hitchcock R. Commentary on: Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence? Arch Dis Child 1997;77(3):26.Google Scholar
- 13.Goldman M, Barr J, Bistritzer T, Aladjem M. Urinary tract infection following ritual Jewish circumcision. Isr Jour Med Sci 1996;32:1098–102.Google Scholar
- 16.Spence J. Spence on circumcision. Lancet 1964;2(7365):902. [24 October 1964]Google Scholar