Skip to main content

Catholic Schools and Public School Achievement

  • Chapter
Catholic Schools
  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

One of the arguments for education vouchers and more private school choice is that more competition from private schools will increase the quality of public education (Friedman 1962; Friedman and Friedman 1981). Recently, New York City’s Mayor Giuliani argued that a private school voucher program in New York City was increasing the quality of public education. His reasoning was that vouchers increased competition between public and private schools (Hartocollis 1997). Similarly, in Chicago there is a recognition that Catholic schools might benefit public schools. For this reason, this past year the head of the public school system in Chicago sent out teams to interview Catholic school principals to learn how to improve public school achievement (The Economist 1998). Apart from recent studies by Hoxby (1994) and Dee (1998) that show that private schools raise the quality of public education, there is very little empirical evidence on this topic. Related studies by Borland and Howsen (1992) and Grosskopf et al. (1998) show that more competition in the public school sector increases the quality of public education.

This chapter was originally published in The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 34, No. 4, Fall 1999, pp. 697–709.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker, Gary S. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, Melvin V. and Roy M. Howsen. 1992. “Student Academic Achievement and the Degree of Market Concentration in Education”. Economics of Education Review 11(1): 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, John, David Jaeger, and Regina Baker. 1995. “Problems with Instrumental Variable Estimation When the Correlation Between Instruments and the Endogenous Variables is Weak.” Journal of the Americana Statistical Association 90 (430):443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, David and Krueger Alan B. 1996. “School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of The Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(4):31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, David. 1992a. “Does School Quality Matter?” Journal of Political Economy 100(1): 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, David. 1992b. “School Quality and Black-White Relative Earnings: A Direct Assessment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CVII(1): 151–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churches and Church Membership in the United States. 1992. Atlanta: Glenmary Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, Thomas S. 1998. “Competition and the Quality of Public Schools.” Economics of Education Review 17(4):419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, Thomas A. and Shane M. Greenstein. 1996. “Understanding the Supply Decisions of Nonprofits: Modelling the Location of Private Schools.” RAND Journal of Economics 27(2): 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 1997. “Answered Prayer.” April 5, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple, Dennis and Richard E. Romana. 1998. “Competition Between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects.” American Economic Review 88(1):33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, William N. and Robert M. Schwab. 1995. “Finishing High School and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Make a Difference?” Quarterly Journal of Economics CX(4):941–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton and Rose Friedman. 1979. Free to Choose. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Ronald F. and Helen F. Ladd. 1996. “How and Why Money Matters: An Analysis of Alabama Schools.” In Holding Schools Accountable, ed. Helen F. Ladd, 265–298. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, Shawna, Kathy Hayes, Lori L. Taylor, and William L. Weber. 1998.. “Allocative Inefficiency and School Competition.” unpublished working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Eric A. 1986. “The Economics of Schooling.” Journal of Economic Literature. 24(3):1141–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Eric A. 1996. “School Resources and Student Performance.” In Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success, ed. Gary Burtless, 43–73.Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Eric A. and Lori Taylor. 1990. “Alternative Assessments of the Performance of Schools,” Journal of Human Resources 25(2): 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartocollis, Anemona. 1997. “Private School Voucher Program to Be Extended.” New York Times, November 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, Robert, Barbara L. Wolfe, and James Spaulding. 1991. “Education Achievement and Childhood Events and Circumstances.” Demography 28(1):133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, Caroline Minter. 1994. “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois State Board of Education. 1996. 1996 School Report Card Data. Springfield: Illinois State Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciniak, Ed. 1998. “Chicago’s Private Elementary and Secondary Schools.” Chicago: Institute of Urban Life, Loyola University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge and Bruce A. Seaman. 1985. “Private Schooling and the Tie-bout Hypothesis.” Public Finance Quarterly 13(3):293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Derek. 1997. “The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Attainment.” Journal of Labor Economics 15(1):98–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander, William. 1996. “Catholic Grade Schools and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 31(3):540–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander, William and Anthony C. Krautmann. 1995. “Catholic Schools, Dropout Rates, and Educational Attainment.” Economic Inquiry 33 (2):217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce. 1992. 1990 Census of Population. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education. 1995. School District Data Book. Arlington, Virginia: The Mesa Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education. 1996. Private School Universe Survey, 1993–94. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sander, W. (2001). Catholic Schools and Public School Achievement. In: Catholic Schools. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3335-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3335-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4867-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3335-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics