Advertisement

Catholic High Schools and Rural Academic Achievement

  • William Sander
Chapter

Abstract

Rural schooling in the United States has been of concern at least since the National Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry was organized in 1867 (Hal-crow). Since T. W. Schultz and others started to point out the importance of education in agricultural production and rural development, rural education has been of particular interest to researchers in agricultural economics and other disciplines (e.g., Broomhall and Johnson; Stallmann et al. 1993; Tweeten and Brinkman). Three decades ago Schultz, (1961, 1967) argued that the quality of rural public schooling was low and that this had a negative effect on productivity in agriculture and on the ability of rural workers to adjust to economic change. More recently, his concern shifted to the low quality of public schooling in big cities (Schultz 1981, 1990).

Keywords

Private School Church Attendance Catholic School Rural Sector Rural Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerheim, K. “Adding Value to the Value-Added Educational Production Function Specification.” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. American Legislative Exchange Council. Report Card on American Education 1994. Washington, D.C.: American Legislative Exchange Council, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G.S. Human Capital. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Betts, J. “Does School Quality Matter? Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.” Review of Economics and Statistics 57 (May 1995): 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, J. “Is the Test Score Decline Responsible for the Productivity Growth Decline?” Amer. Econ. Rev. 79 (March 1989):178–197.Google Scholar
  6. Brigham, F. United States Catholic Elementary and Secondary Schools 1992–1993. Washington, D.C.: National Catholic Education Association, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. Broomhall, D.E. and T.G. Johnson. “Economic Factors that Influence Educational Performance in Rural Schools.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (August 1994):557–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryk, A.S., V.E. Lee, and P.B. Holland. Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. Card, D. and A. Krueger. “Does School Quality Matter?” Journal of Political Economy 100 (February 1992): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chubb, J.S. and T.M. Moe. Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. “Do Students Learn More In Private Schools Than In Public Schools?” Tallahassee: The James Madison Institute For Public Policy Studies, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, J., T. Hoffer, and S. Kilgore. High School Achievement. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. “Questions and Answers: Our Response.” Harvard Educational Review 51 (November 1981):526–545.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, W.N. and R.M. Schwab. “Finishing High School and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Make A Difference?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (November 1995):941–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferguson, R.F. “Paying for Public Education.” Harvard Journal of Legislation 28 (Summer 1991):465–498.Google Scholar
  16. Ferguson, R.F. and H.F. Ladd. “How and Why Money Matters: An Analysis of Alabama Schools.” in H.F. Ladd. Holding Schools Accountable. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, M. Capitalism & Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  18. Goldberger, A.R. and G. Cain. “The Causal Analysis of Cognitive Outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer and Kilgore Report.” Sociology of Education 55 (1982): 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greeley, A.M. Catholic High Schools and Minority Students. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Halcrow, H.G. Food Policy for America. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. Hanushek, E.A. “The Economics of Schooling.” Journal of Economic Literature 24 (1986):1141–1177.Google Scholar
  22. Hanushek, E.A. Making Schools Work: Improving Performance and Controlling Costs. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. Hanushek, E.A. and L. Taylor. “Alternative Assessments of the Performance of Schools.”. Hum. Res. 25 (Spring 1990): 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris, J. The Cost of Catholic Parishes and Schools. Kansas City: Sheed and Ward, 1996.Google Scholar
  25. Heckman, J. “Sample Selection Bias as Specification Error.” Econometrica 47 (January 1979): 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hedges, L.V., R.D. Laine, and R. Greenwald. “Does Money Matter?” Educational Resources 23 (April 1994):5–14.Google Scholar
  27. Hoffer, T., A.M. Greeley, and J.S. Coleman. “Achievement Growth in Public and Catholic Schools.” Sociology of Education 58 (April 1985): 74–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoxby, C.M. “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4978, 1994.Google Scholar
  29. Hoxby, C.M. “Is There an Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off in School Finance?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5265, 1995.Google Scholar
  30. Kozol, J. Savage Inequalities. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc., 1991.Google Scholar
  31. Murnane, R.J. “A Review Essay—Comparisons of Public and Private Schools: Lessons from the Uproar.” Journal of Human Resources 19 (Spring 1984):263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murnane, R.J., S. Newstead, and R.J. Olsen. “Comparing Public and Private Schools: The Puzzling Role of Selectivity Bias.” Journal of Economic Business Statistics 3 (January 1985):23–35.Google Scholar
  33. Murnane, R.J., J.B. Willett, and F. Levy. “The Growing Importance of Cognitive Skills in Wage Determination.” Review of Economics and Statistics 127 (1995):251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. National Center for Education Statistics. The Condition of Education 1994. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Education, 1994.Google Scholar
  35. Neal, D. “The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Attainment.” Journal of Labor Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  36. Neal, D.A. and W.R. Johnson. “The Role of Premarket Factors in Black-White Wage Differences.” Journal of Political Economy 104 (October 1996): 869–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noell, J. (1982), “Public and Catholic Schools: A Reanalysis of Public and Private Schools.” Sociology of Education (April/July 1982)55:123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sander, W. The Catholic Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital. Boulder: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  39. Sander, W. “Catholic Grade Schools and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 31 (Summer 1996):540–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sander, W. and A.C. Krautmann. “Catholic Schools, Dropout Rates, and Educational Attainment.” Econ. Inq. 33 (April 1995): 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schultz, T.W. “Investment in Human Capital.” American Economics Review 51 (March 1961):1–17.Google Scholar
  42. Schultz, T.W. Investing in People. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  43. Schultz, T.W. “National Employment Skills and Earnings of Farm Labor.” in C.E. Bishop (ed.), Farm Labor in the United State. New York: Columbia University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  44. Schultz, T.W. Restoring Economic Equilibrium. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
  45. Stallmann, J.I., T.G. Johnson, A. Mwachofi, and J.L. Flora. “Labor Market Incentives to Stay in School.” Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics. 25 (December 1993):82–94.Google Scholar
  46. Tweeten, L. and G.L. Brinkman. Micropolitan Development. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  47. United States Department of Commerce. 1990 Census of Population. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1993.Google Scholar
  48. United States Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1994.Google Scholar
  49. United States Department of Education. High School and Beyond 1980 Sophomore Cohort Third Follow-Up (1986). Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1986.Google Scholar
  50. Willis, R.J. and S. Rosen. “Education and Self-Selection.” Journal of Political Economy 87 (October 1979):S7–S36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Word, E., C.M. Achilles, H. Bain, J. Folger, J. Johnston, and N. Lintz. “Student/ Teacher Ratio (STAR) Tennessee’s K-3 Class Size Study.” Nashville: Project STAR Office, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Sander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations