Abstract
Consider an experiment which is coming to an end. At its conclusion, the experiment’s prinicple investigator often feels hemmed in, cornered, and eventually trapped by persistent critics. They left him alone during both the design and the execution of the experiment. However, as soon as he attempts to draw a conclusion from his sample, hesitant and circumspect as these conclusions may be, the specter of sampling error rises up. Even if the results are negative, demonstrating no relationship between the treatment and the disease, the critics close in, asking now about type II error. Isn’t it possible that there was an effect in the population, but, again through the play of chance, the population produced for the investigator a sample that demonstrated no relationship. Critics relentlessly remind him that his findings may be nothing at all, merely the vicissitude of the population, Like a weed, sampling error rises up to strangle the early blossom of his result. Is there no hope?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lachim, J.M., (1981) “Introduction to sample size determinations and power analyses for clinical trials,” Controlled Clinical Trials 2: 93114.
Sahai, H., and Khurshid, A., (1996) “Formulae and tables for determination of sample size and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two sample design,” Statistics in Medicine 15: 1–21.
Davy, S.J. and Graham, O.T., (1991) “Sample size estimation for comparing two or more treatment groups on clinical trials,” Statistics in Medicine 10: 3–43.
Donner, A., (1984) “Approach to sample size estimation in the design of clinical trials—a review,” Statistics in Medicine 3: 199–214.
George S.L., and Desue, M.M., (1974) “Planning the size and duration of a clinical trial studying the time to some critical event,” Journal of Chronic Disease 27: 15–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moyé, L.A. (2000). “Your Searchlight’s Not On!” Power and P Values. In: Statistical Reasoning in Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3292-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3292-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98933-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3292-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive