Skip to main content

The Legal Values of Pi

  • Chapter
  • 1006 Accesses

Abstract

I have long been interested in the notorious attempt to legislate a legal value of π. I have read several articles [2,5,6,7,8,10] on the history of this attempt and it has been mentioned in the popular press recently [1,9]. From these it is clear that only Greenblatt [5] and Hallerberg [7] have tried to understand the obscure content of the proposed bill. Greenblatt found four different values of π given in it! Hallerberg has tried to understand how some of the values came about.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon. (1983) Reciting to the point of boredom. The Guardian (3 Nov.), 1

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. E. Edington (1935) House Bill No. 246, Indiana State Legislature, 1897. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci., 45, 206–210

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. J. Goodwin (1894) Quadrature of the circle. Amer. Math. Month., 1, 246–247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. E. J. Goodwin (1895) (A) The trisection of an angle; (B) Duplication of the cube. Amer. Math. Month., 2, 337

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. H. Greenblatt (1965) The “legal” value of Tr, and some related mathematical anomalies. American Scientist (Dec.), 427A–434A

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. E. Hallerberg (1975) House Bill No. 246 revisited. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci., 84, 374–399

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. E. Hallerberg (1977) Indiana’s squared circle. Matit. Mag., 50, 136–140

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. T. F. Holgate (1935) Rules for making pi digestible. The Atlantic Monthly (July), 118–119

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Millington (1982) Letter: The House divided and got a zero answer. The Guardian (8 Nov.)

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. A. Waldo (1916) What might have been. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci., 26, 445–446

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singmaster, D. (2000). The Legal Values of Pi. In: Pi: A Source Book. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3240-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3240-5_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-3242-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3240-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics