Advertisement

Representations of Texture in Orientation Space

  • Krishna Rajan

Abstract

In this and the following chapter, we provide an overview of the representations of texture measurement with a particular focus on those aspects that are particularly relevant to electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) techniques. The mathematical foundations of visualization of three-dimensional orientation and the frequency distribution of specific orientations are discussed extensively in the literature (Bunge, 1982; Wenk, 1985; Kocks, Tomé, and Wenk, 1998). The focus of the present chapter is to outline the more commonly used forms of graphical representations of texture data. We shall review three commonly used forms of texture representation in terms of sample and/or lattice plane orientation, namely, pole figures and inverse pole figures represented in terms of stereographic projections and orientation distribution functions projected in Euler space. The graphical visualization of these projections of orientation information will be discussed, especially in the context of data representation as derived from EBSD type techniques. These representations form the foundation for most texture analysis studies and will be widely used in the variety of materials science applications represented in this book.

Keywords

Pole Figure Euler Angle Orientation Distribution Function Orientation Information Stereographic Projection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Bunge, HJ., 1982, Texture Analysis in Materials Science, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  2. Bunge, HJ., 1985, in: Preferred Orientation in Deformed Metals and Rocks: An Introduction to Modern Texture Analysis, H-R. Wenk, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Cullity, 1956, Elements of X-ray Diffraction Addison -Wesley, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Heidelbach, F., Rickel, C, and Wenk, H-R., 1999, Quantitative texture analysis of small domains with synchrotron radiation x-rays, J. Applied Crystallography 32:5:841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henry, N.F.M., Lipson, H, and Wooster, W.A., 1961, The Interpretation of X-ray Diffraction Photographs, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  6. Jeffrey, J.W., 1971, Methods in X-ray Crystallography, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. Kocks, U.F., Tomé, C.N., and Wenk, H-R., 1998, Texture and Anisotropy: Preferred Orientations in Polycrystals and their Effect on Materials Properties, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Matthies, S., 1979, On the reproducibility of the orientation distribution function of texture samples from pole figures (ghost phenomenon), Phys. Status Solidi, B92:135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Montesin, T. and Heizmann, J.J., 1992, Evolution of crystallographic texture in thin wires, J. Applied Crystallography, 25:665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morawiec, A., 1999, Automatic orientation determination from Kikuchi patterns, J. Applied Crystallography, 32:788–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mücklich, A. and Klimanek, P., 1994, Experimental errors in quantitative texture analysis from diffraction pole figures, Materials Science Forum, 157–162:275.Google Scholar
  12. Peiser, H.S., Rooksby, H.P., and Wilson, A.J.C., 1960, X-ray Diffraction by Polycrystalline Materials, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  13. Petkie, R., 1996, Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Rajan, K. and Petike, R., 1998, Microtexture and anisotropy in wire drawn copper, Materials Science and Engineering A, 46:185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Randle, V., 1995, Microtexture Determination and its Application, Institute of Materials, London.Google Scholar
  16. Schwartz, L.H. and Cohen, J.B., 1987, Diffraction from Materials 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwarzer, R.A., 2000, Automated crystal orientation mapping: present state and prospects — this volume.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krishna Rajan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringRennselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations