Advertisement

Addressing Current and Planning for Future Ethical Issues in Child Maltreatment Research

Professional and Policy Ethical Decision Making
  • Alexander J. Tymchuk
Part of the Issues in Clinical Child Psychology book series (ICCP)

Abstract

Although the ethical challenges facing investigators in planning for and performing child maltreatment research are being recognized, formal discussion is just beginning regarding the complexities of those ethical questions, regarding the methods available to aid investigators in the identification of the issues, and regarding how investigators might learn acceptable ways in which to address those issues. Also, there has been little discussion regarding how investigators can best be informed about past and current ethical issues, about the guides that were available at those times to address the issues and how the results of the application of those guides might be applied to specific circumstances today. Ethics education in professional curricula, for example, has been very limited; this has resulted in inconsistency of interpretation of current ethical guidelines, especially regarding novel or less familiar ethical dilemmas (see, e.g., Rae & Worchel, 1991; Tymchuk, 1985; Tymchuk et al., 1979, 1982).

Keywords

Child Maltreatment Intellectual Disability Ethical Decision Ethical Dilemma Consent Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association for Advanced Training in the Behavioral Sciences (AATBS). (1991). Preparatory course for the psychology licensure examination. Westlake, CA.: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bass, L., Dellers, S., Ogloff, J., Peterson, C, Pettifor, J., Reavers, R., Retfalvi, T., Simon, N., Sinclair, C., & Tipton, R. (1996). Professional conduct and discipline in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beecher, H. (1970). Research and the individual. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
  4. Bok, S. (1989). Lying-Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Bowie, G., Higgins, K., & Michaels, M. (1992). Thirteen questions in ethics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Canadian Psychological Association (CPA). (1991). Companion manual to the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Capron, A. (1982). The competence of children as self-deciders in biomedical interventions. In W. Gaylin & R. Macklin, (Eds.), Who speaks for the child: The problem of proxy consent. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clemen, R. (1986). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis. Boston: PWS-Kent.Google Scholar
  9. Corey, G., Corey, M., & Callahan, P. (1984). Issues and ethics in the helping professions. Pacific Grove, CA.: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  10. Dalglish, T. (1976). Protecting human subjects on social and behavioral research: Ethics, law and the DHEW rules: A critique. Berkeley, CA: Center for Research in Management Science.Google Scholar
  11. Finkelhor, D. (1996). Introduction. In J. Briere, L. Berliner, J. Bulkley, C. Jenny, & T. Reid (Eds.), The AP-SAC handbook on child maltreatment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Finkelhor, D., & Strapko, N. (1992). Sexual abuse and prevention education: A review of evaluation studies. In D. Willis, E. Holden, & M. Rosenberg, (Eds.), Prevention of child maltreatment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Francoeur, R. (1983). Biomedical ethics: A guide to decision making. Philadelphia: LippincottGoogle Scholar
  14. Gawthrop, J., & Uhlemann, M. (1992). Effects of the problem-solving approach in ethics training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonsalves, M. (1989). Right & reason: Ethics in theory and practice. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
  16. Halpern, D. (1989). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Harron, F., Burnside, J., & Beauchamp, T. (1983). Health and human values: A guide to making your own decisions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, C, & Tymchuk, A. (1981). Informed consent with children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
  19. Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Joint Council on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (1994). Accreditation standards. Chicago: Author.Google Scholar
  21. Keith-Spiegel, P., & Koocher, G. (1985). Ethics in psychology: Professional standards and cases. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. Krynski, M., Tymchuk, A., & Ouslander, J. (1994). How informed can consent be? Gerontologist, 34, 36–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levine, R. (1981). Ethics and regulation of clinical research. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
  24. Melton, G. (1992). Respecting boundaries: Minors, privacy, and behavioral research. In B. Stanley, & J. Sieber (Eds.), Social research on children and adolescents: Ethical issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Myers, J. (1992). Legal issues in child abuse and neglect. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report. Washington, DC: Office for the Protection from Research Risks.Google Scholar
  27. National Research Council (NRC). (1993). Understanding child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR). (1993). Protecting human research subjects. Institutional Review Board guidebook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  29. Ouslander, J., Tymchuk, A., & Rahbar, B. (1989). Health care decisions among elderly long term care esidents and their potential proxies. Archives of Internal Medicine, 149, 367–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1981). Protecting human subjects: The adequacy and uniformity of federal rules and their implementation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. Rae, W., & Worchel, F. (1991). Ethical beliefs and behaviors of psychologists: A survey. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 16, 727–745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raines, M., & Tymchuk, A. (1993). Psychological factors in oncology nurses’ ethical decision-making: Relationships among moral reasoning, coping style, and ethical stress. Oncology Nursing Society Special Interest Newsletter,4, Parts 1 and 2 in Issues 2, 2–5 and 3, 1–5.Google Scholar
  33. Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Koopman, C. (1992). Protecting children’s rights in AIDS research. In B. Stanley & J. Sieber (Eds.), Social research on children and adolescents. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Stanley, B., & Sieber, J. (Eds.). (1992). Social research on children and adolescents. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Tymchuk, A. (1981). Ethical decision making and psychological treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Treatment and Evaluation, 26, 507–513.Google Scholar
  36. Tymchuk, A. (1982a). Strategies for resolving value dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 26, 159–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tymchuk, A. (1982b, September). Informed consent with vulnerable populations. Invited paper to the joint NIH/FDA Conference on Human Subject Protection, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  38. Tymchuk, A. (1983a). Ethical decision making and primary prevention. Invited paper to the NIMH Conference on Ethics and Primary Prevention, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  39. Tymchuk, A. (1983b, May). Guidelines for ethical decision making. Invited address to the Canadian Psychological Association annual meeting, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Tymchuk, A. (1985). Ethical decision making and psychology students’ attitudes toward training in ethics. Professional Practice of Psychology, 6, 219–232.Google Scholar
  41. Tymchuk, A. (1986). Guidelines for ethical decision making. Canadian Psychology, 27, 36–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tymchuk, A. (1989). Anticipatory ethical and policy decision making in the community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tymchuk, A. (1990). Assent processes. In B. Stanley, & J. Sieber (Eds.). Social research on children and adolescents. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Tymchuk, A. (1993a). Two forms of the UCLA Research Participation Reading Recognition Test—Experimental Version. University of California, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  45. Tymchuk, A. (1993b). The UCLA Research Participation Reading Comprehension Test—Experimental Version. University of California, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  46. Tymchuk, A. (1996, 28–29 September). The development, implementation and preliminary evaluation of a cross-agency, multi-locale self-healthcare and safety preparatory and prevention education program for parents with intellectual disabilities. Invited address to the European Union Conference on Parenting with Intellectual Disability, Elsinore, Denmark. Published in the proceedings.Google Scholar
  47. Tymchuk, A., Drapkin, R., Ackerman, A., Major, S., Coffman, E., & Baum, M. (1979). Survey of training in ethics in APA-approved clinical psychology programs. American Psychologist, 34, 1168–1170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tymchuk, A., Drapkin, R., Ackerman, A., Major. S., Coffman, E., & Baum, M. (1982). Ethical decision making and psychologists’ attitudes toward training in ethics. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 13, 412–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tymchuk, A., & Ouslander, J. (1990). Optimizing the informed consent process with elderly people. Educational Gerontology, 16, 245–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tymchuk, A., & Ouslander, J. (1991). Does order affect recall of informed consent information? Educational Gerontology, 17, 11–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tymchuk, A., Ouslander, J., & Rader, N. (1986). Informing the elderly: A comparison of four methods. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 34, 818–822.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tymchuk, A., Ouslander, J., Rahbar, B., & Fitten, J. (1988). Medical decision making elderly people in long term care. Gerontologist, 28(Suppl.), 59–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander J. Tymchuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations