Advertisement

Risk Communication in Central and Eastern Europe: The Role of the Environmental Movement

  • Klára Faragó
Chapter
Part of the Technology, Risk, and Society book series (RISKGOSO, volume 11)

Abstract

In comparison with Japan, North America and western Europe, the health prospects of people in the countries of central and eastern Europe a are grim. People in this part of the European Region live a decade shorter, and infant mortality is higher than in the rest of the industrialized world. High rates of acute respiratory diseases and lead poisoning are among the causes of health problems in childhood. The evidence of cardiovascular diseases and some types of cancer — the chief causes of death — has tended to increase in recent years. The growing gap between east and west began to emerge in the 1960s, resulting from a stagnation or decrease of life expectancy in countries of central and eastern Europe and an increase in western Europe.

Keywords

Local Government Hazardous Waste Public Participation Risk Communication Environmental Impact Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Sources and References

Interviews

  1. Interview with Zsolt Baltazar, then head, Department of Planning, Ministry of Environment, October 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Interview with Erno Lakos, Vice Director of Metalloglobus, October 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Interview with Agnes Vegvari, Green Future, resident of Nagytétény, September 1992.Google Scholar

References

  1. British Medical Association (1991). Hazardous waste and human health. London, British Medical Association.Google Scholar
  2. Intron Bodemtech Environmental and Geotechnical Company (1991). [Results of investigation of the soil contamination of Metallochemia and its environment.] Budapest, Green Future Environmental Protection and Education Center.Google Scholar
  3. Kemp, R. & Gerrard, S. (1991). Hazard assessment techniques for UK landfill sites: HALO. Integrated environmental management, 1 (5): 20–21.Google Scholar
  4. Upton, A.C. et al. (1989). Public health aspects of toxic chemical disposal sites. Annual review of public health, 10: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Zapponi, G.A. et al. (1992). Factors which influence public reaction to environmental risk: some past experiences in Italy. In: Ball, D.J. & Stern, R.M., ed. Risk communication: dealing with the spectrum of environment and health risks in Europe. Report of a WHO Consultation, Ulm, 28–30 November 1990. Norwich, Environmental Risk Assessment Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia (Research Report No. 11 ).Google Scholar
  6. Farago, K. & Vari, A. (1991). From open debate to position war: siting a radioactive waste repository in Hungary. Waste management, 11: 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, D. (1992). Paradise deferred: environmental policy making in central and eastern Europe. London, Energy and Environmental Programme.Google Scholar
  8. Toth Nagy, M. et al., ed. (1994). Manual on public participation in environmental decision-making: current practice and future possibilities in central and eastern Europe. Budapest, Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern-Europe.Google Scholar
  9. World Resources Institute (1992). World resources 1992–3. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klára Faragó

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations