Skip to main content

New Control Paradigms for Deregulation

  • Chapter
Power Systems Restructuring

Abstract

Restructuring of the electric energy utility industry is well underway, even as wide-ranging debate continues about desirable and achievable nature and goals. At this stage of the process, it would be a mistake to assume that any of the experiments in restructuring that are now under way necessarily represent the final patterns that will develop over the next decades. It is important to remember that the traditional industry structural and operating paradigms evolved together, in symbiosis. Energy management in general, and automatic generation control in particular, have been part of that evolution, which has reflected a generally stable pattern of vertically integrated, regulated corporations. The industry’s management and control structures have been effective, in large part because they reflected the existing industry structure. If the industry structure had evolved differently, operating practices no doubt would be quite different. It is to be expected, then, that a radically restructured industry will need, and will develop, new control structures adapted to the new circumstances. One should consider what operating practices, irrespective of past practice, would be most congruent to the new, disaggregated structure?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L.J.Hill: Is Policy Leading Analysis in Electric Restructuring?; Elec. Jour., v. 10 /6, July 1997, pp. 50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L.H.Fink, M.D.Ilic, F.D.Galiana: Transmission Access Rights and Tariffs; Elec. Power Syst. Res.,(to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  3. K.Anderson: Transmission Services Under Restructuring: Getting the Incentives (Almost) Right; Elect. Jour., v. 10 /5, June 1997, pp. 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N.E.Nilsson, J.Mercurio: Synchronous Generator Capability Curve Testing and Evaluation; IEEE Trans. v.PD-9/1, Jan. 1994, pp. 414–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FERC: Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission Services; U.S. Fed. Energy Reg. Comm., 70 FERC 61,357; p.175, note 269.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.Nichols: Techniques in Handling Load-Regulating Problems on Interconnected Power Systems; AIEE Trans. v. 72 /6, 1953, pp. 447–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N.Jaleeli et al.: Understanding Automatic Generation Control; IEEE Trans. v.PS-7/3, 1992, pp.1106–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L.H.Fink, I.Erkmen: Economic Dispatch to Match Actual Data to the Actual Problem; Proc. EPRI Power Plant Perf. Monitoring and System Disp. Conf.,Washington D.C., 12–14 November 1986, EPRI CS/EL5251-SR, July 1987, pp.4/23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.G.Kwatny, T.A.Athay: Coordination of Economic Dispatch and Load-Frequency Control in Electric Power Systems; Proc. IEEE/CSS Conf. on Dec. and Cont., 1979, pp. 703–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F.F.Wu, P.Varaiya: Coordinated Multilateral Trades for Electric Power Networks — Theory and Implementation; Rpt. PWP-031, June 1995, Univ. of Cal. Energy Inst., Berkeley, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  11. CIGRE Task Force 38.02.12 (ed. C.W.Taylor): Criteria and Countermeasures for Voltage Collapse; CIGRE, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.Nedwick et al.: Reactive Management–A Key to Survival in the 1990s; IEEE Trans. v.PS-10, n.2, May 1995, pp. 1036–43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.F.Mistr,Jr.: Reactive Planning and Operation on the Virginia Electric and Power Co. System; Proc. EPRI/NERC Forum on Voltage Stability,Breckenridge, Colorado, September 1992, (EPRI TR-102222), pp•2/15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.H.Fink: Security — Its Meaning and Objectives; Proc. Intl Symp. on Power System Security Assessment,Ames, Iowa, 27–29 April, pp.3541

    Google Scholar 

  15. N.Balu et al.: On-Line Power System Security Analysis; Proc. IEEE, v. 80 /2, Feb. 1992, pp. 262–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B.Avramovic, L.H.Fink: Real-Time Reactive Security Monitoring; IEEE Trans. v.PS-7/1, 1992, pp.432–37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.D.11ic, F.Graves: Optimal Use of Ancillary Generation under Open Access and its Possible Implementation; TR 95–006, Mass. Inst. of Tech., Lab. for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.Haurie et al.: A Two-Player Game Model of Power Cogeneration in New England; IEEE Trans. v.AC-37/9, Sept. 1992, pp. 1451–56.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y.Tsukamoto, I.Iyoda: Allocation of Fixed Transmission Cost to Wheeling Transactions by Cooperative Game Theory; Proc. IEEE/PES PICA,May 1995, Denver, pp.3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.F.Nash: Noncooperative Games; Ann. Math., v. 54 /2, 1951, pp. 28695.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. G.P.Papavassilopoulos, J.B.Cruz: Nonclassical Control Problems and Stackelberg Games; IEEE Trans. v.AC-24/2, April 1979, pp. 155–66.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y.C.Ho, D.Teneketzis: On the Interactions of Incentive and Information Structures; IEEE Trans. v.AC-29/7, July 1984, pp. 647–50.

    Google Scholar 

  23. U.S.FERC Docket No. RM95–9–000: “Real–Time Information Networks,” Notice of Technical Conference and Request for Comments, (March 29, 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  24. PacifiCorp leading talks on creating transmission company for entire West;“ Elect. Util. Week,7 August 1995, p.1

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.F.Vojdani, C.F.Imparato, N.K.Saini, B.F.Wollenberg, H.H.Happ: Transmission Access Issues; 95WM121–4PWRS

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.W.Chapman et al.: Stabilizing a Multimachine Power System via Decentralized Feedback Linearizing Excitation Control; IEEE Trans. v.PS8/3, August 1993, pp. 830–39.

    Google Scholar 

  27. K.Kumai, K.Ode: Power System Voltage Control by Using a Process Control Computer; IEEE Trans. v.PAS-87 n. 12, 1968, pp. 1985–90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S.Narita, M.S.A.A.Hammam: Multicomputer Control of Voltage and Reactive Power in Multiarea Power Pools; IEEE/PES 1971 Summer Meeting, Portland, Oregon, paper 71 CP 597-PWR.

    Google Scholar 

  29. H.Kobayashi, Y.Tamura, S.Narita, M.S.A.A.Hammam: Hierarchical Control of System Voltage and Reactive Power; IEEE/PES 1976 Winter Meeting, New York, paper A 76 212–1.

    Google Scholar 

  30. V.Arcidiacono: Automatic Voltage and Reactive Power Control in Transmission Systems; Proc. CIGRE-IFAC Symp. 39–83,Florence 1983, survey paper E

    Google Scholar 

  31. S.Corsi et al.: Coordination Between the Reactive Power Scheduling Function and the Hierarchical Voltage Control of the EHV ENEL System; IEEE/PES Summer Meeting, San Francisco, 24–28 July 1994 (94SM 584–3 PWRS)

    Google Scholar 

  32. X.Liu, C.Vialas, M.11ic, M.Athans, B.Heilbronn: A New Concept for Tertiary Coordination of Secondary Voltage Control on a Large Power Network; Proc. 11the PSCC, Avignon, France, Aug./Sept. 1993, pp.9951002.

    Google Scholar 

  33. H.M.Smith,Jr.,S-Y.Tong: Minimizing Power Transmission Losses by Reactive–Volt-Ampere Control; AIEE Trans. v. 82, 1963, pp. 542–44.

    Google Scholar 

  34. W.O.Stadlin: Criteria for the Control and Economic Dispatch of Reactive Volt Amperes; IEEE/PES Summer Meeting, New Orleans, July 1966, 31PP66–332.

    Google Scholar 

  35. CIGRE Task Force 39.02: Voltage and Reactive Power Control; CIGRE 1992 (39–203)

    Google Scholar 

  36. L.Franchi et al.: Evaluation of Economy and/or Security Oriented Objective Functions for Reactive Power Scheduling in Large Scale Systems; IEEE Trans. v.PAS-102/10, 1983, pp.3481–88

    Google Scholar 

  37. A.Capasso, E.Mariani, C.Sabelli: On the Objective Functions for Reactive Power Optimization; IEEE/PES Winter Meeting, 1980 (paper A80 090–1; abstract appeared in IEEE Trans. v.PAS-99, n.4, July/August 1980, p. 1326 )

    Google Scholar 

  38. CIGRE Task Force 38.02.03: Improvement of Voltage Control; Electra, n. 135, April 1991, pp. 117–27.

    Google Scholar 

  39. D.N.Ewart: Automatic Generation Control, Performance under normal conditions; Systems Engineering for Power–Status and Prospects, U.S.-E.R.D.A. Conf.-750867 (76–66), 1975, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  40. F.R.Schleif: Interconnected Power Systems Operation at Below Normal Frequency; EPRI Report EL-976, February 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  41. L.S.VanSlyck, N.Jaleeli, W.R.Kelley: A Comprehensive Shakedown of an Automatic Generation Control Process; IEEE Trans. v.PWRS-4 n. 2, 1989, pp. 771–81.

    Google Scholar 

  42. IEEE/PES Working Group: Current Operational Problems Associated with Automatic Generation Control; IEEE Trans. v.PAS-98 n.1, Jan. 1979, pp. 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  43. J.Zaborszky, J.Singh: A Reevaluation of the Normal Operating State Control of the Power System Using Computer Control and System Theory; Proc. 11 the IEEE/PES PICA,1979, pp.205–13.

    Google Scholar 

  44. C.Concordia: “Effect of Prime-Mover Speed Control Characteristics on Electric Power System Performance,” IEEE Trans. v.PAS-88 n. 5, May 1969, pp. 752–54.

    Google Scholar 

  45. L.H.Fink: Ancillary Transmission Services; Elec. Jour., v,9/5, June 1996, pp. 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  46. L.H.Fink: Security - Its Meaning and Objectives; Proc. Intl Symp. on Power System Security Assessment,Ames, Iowa, 27–29 April, pp.35–41

    Google Scholar 

  47. N.Balu et al.: On-Line Power System Security Analysis; Proc. IEEE, v. 80 /2, Feb. 1992, pp. 262–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. B.Avramovic, L.H.Fink: Real-Time Reactive Security Monitoring; IEEE Trans. v.PS-7/1, 1992, pp.432–37.

    Google Scholar 

  49. F.F.Wu, P.Varaiya: Coordinated Multilateral Trades for Electric Power Networks — Theory and Implementation; Rpt. PWP-031, June 1995, Univ. of Cal. Energy Inst., Berkeley, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  50. M.D.Ilic, F.Graves: Optimal Use of Ancillary Generation under Open Access and its Possible Implementation; TR 95–006, Mass. Inst. of Tech., Lab. for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fink, L.H. (1998). New Control Paradigms for Deregulation. In: Power Systems Restructuring. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2883-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2883-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5038-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2883-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics