Abstract
Restructuring of the electric energy utility industry is well underway, even as wide-ranging debate continues about desirable and achievable nature and goals. At this stage of the process, it would be a mistake to assume that any of the experiments in restructuring that are now under way necessarily represent the final patterns that will develop over the next decades. It is important to remember that the traditional industry structural and operating paradigms evolved together, in symbiosis. Energy management in general, and automatic generation control in particular, have been part of that evolution, which has reflected a generally stable pattern of vertically integrated, regulated corporations. The industry’s management and control structures have been effective, in large part because they reflected the existing industry structure. If the industry structure had evolved differently, operating practices no doubt would be quite different. It is to be expected, then, that a radically restructured industry will need, and will develop, new control structures adapted to the new circumstances. One should consider what operating practices, irrespective of past practice, would be most congruent to the new, disaggregated structure?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L.J.Hill: Is Policy Leading Analysis in Electric Restructuring?; Elec. Jour., v. 10 /6, July 1997, pp. 50–61
L.H.Fink, M.D.Ilic, F.D.Galiana: Transmission Access Rights and Tariffs; Elec. Power Syst. Res.,(to appear)
K.Anderson: Transmission Services Under Restructuring: Getting the Incentives (Almost) Right; Elect. Jour., v. 10 /5, June 1997, pp. 14–21.
N.E.Nilsson, J.Mercurio: Synchronous Generator Capability Curve Testing and Evaluation; IEEE Trans. v.PD-9/1, Jan. 1994, pp. 414–24.
FERC: Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission Services; U.S. Fed. Energy Reg. Comm., 70 FERC 61,357; p.175, note 269.
C.Nichols: Techniques in Handling Load-Regulating Problems on Interconnected Power Systems; AIEE Trans. v. 72 /6, 1953, pp. 447–60.
N.Jaleeli et al.: Understanding Automatic Generation Control; IEEE Trans. v.PS-7/3, 1992, pp.1106–22.
L.H.Fink, I.Erkmen: Economic Dispatch to Match Actual Data to the Actual Problem; Proc. EPRI Power Plant Perf. Monitoring and System Disp. Conf.,Washington D.C., 12–14 November 1986, EPRI CS/EL5251-SR, July 1987, pp.4/23–43.
H.G.Kwatny, T.A.Athay: Coordination of Economic Dispatch and Load-Frequency Control in Electric Power Systems; Proc. IEEE/CSS Conf. on Dec. and Cont., 1979, pp. 703–14.
F.F.Wu, P.Varaiya: Coordinated Multilateral Trades for Electric Power Networks — Theory and Implementation; Rpt. PWP-031, June 1995, Univ. of Cal. Energy Inst., Berkeley, Cal.
CIGRE Task Force 38.02.12 (ed. C.W.Taylor): Criteria and Countermeasures for Voltage Collapse; CIGRE, 1995.
P.Nedwick et al.: Reactive Management–A Key to Survival in the 1990s; IEEE Trans. v.PS-10, n.2, May 1995, pp. 1036–43.
A.F.Mistr,Jr.: Reactive Planning and Operation on the Virginia Electric and Power Co. System; Proc. EPRI/NERC Forum on Voltage Stability,Breckenridge, Colorado, September 1992, (EPRI TR-102222), pp•2/15–24.
L.H.Fink: Security — Its Meaning and Objectives; Proc. Intl Symp. on Power System Security Assessment,Ames, Iowa, 27–29 April, pp.3541
N.Balu et al.: On-Line Power System Security Analysis; Proc. IEEE, v. 80 /2, Feb. 1992, pp. 262–80.
B.Avramovic, L.H.Fink: Real-Time Reactive Security Monitoring; IEEE Trans. v.PS-7/1, 1992, pp.432–37.
M.D.11ic, F.Graves: Optimal Use of Ancillary Generation under Open Access and its Possible Implementation; TR 95–006, Mass. Inst. of Tech., Lab. for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, August 1995.
A.Haurie et al.: A Two-Player Game Model of Power Cogeneration in New England; IEEE Trans. v.AC-37/9, Sept. 1992, pp. 1451–56.
Y.Tsukamoto, I.Iyoda: Allocation of Fixed Transmission Cost to Wheeling Transactions by Cooperative Game Theory; Proc. IEEE/PES PICA,May 1995, Denver, pp.3–10.
J.F.Nash: Noncooperative Games; Ann. Math., v. 54 /2, 1951, pp. 28695.
G.P.Papavassilopoulos, J.B.Cruz: Nonclassical Control Problems and Stackelberg Games; IEEE Trans. v.AC-24/2, April 1979, pp. 155–66.
Y.C.Ho, D.Teneketzis: On the Interactions of Incentive and Information Structures; IEEE Trans. v.AC-29/7, July 1984, pp. 647–50.
U.S.FERC Docket No. RM95–9–000: “Real–Time Information Networks,” Notice of Technical Conference and Request for Comments, (March 29, 1995 ).
PacifiCorp leading talks on creating transmission company for entire West;“ Elect. Util. Week,7 August 1995, p.1
A.F.Vojdani, C.F.Imparato, N.K.Saini, B.F.Wollenberg, H.H.Happ: Transmission Access Issues; 95WM121–4PWRS
J.W.Chapman et al.: Stabilizing a Multimachine Power System via Decentralized Feedback Linearizing Excitation Control; IEEE Trans. v.PS8/3, August 1993, pp. 830–39.
K.Kumai, K.Ode: Power System Voltage Control by Using a Process Control Computer; IEEE Trans. v.PAS-87 n. 12, 1968, pp. 1985–90.
S.Narita, M.S.A.A.Hammam: Multicomputer Control of Voltage and Reactive Power in Multiarea Power Pools; IEEE/PES 1971 Summer Meeting, Portland, Oregon, paper 71 CP 597-PWR.
H.Kobayashi, Y.Tamura, S.Narita, M.S.A.A.Hammam: Hierarchical Control of System Voltage and Reactive Power; IEEE/PES 1976 Winter Meeting, New York, paper A 76 212–1.
V.Arcidiacono: Automatic Voltage and Reactive Power Control in Transmission Systems; Proc. CIGRE-IFAC Symp. 39–83,Florence 1983, survey paper E
S.Corsi et al.: Coordination Between the Reactive Power Scheduling Function and the Hierarchical Voltage Control of the EHV ENEL System; IEEE/PES Summer Meeting, San Francisco, 24–28 July 1994 (94SM 584–3 PWRS)
X.Liu, C.Vialas, M.11ic, M.Athans, B.Heilbronn: A New Concept for Tertiary Coordination of Secondary Voltage Control on a Large Power Network; Proc. 11the PSCC, Avignon, France, Aug./Sept. 1993, pp.9951002.
H.M.Smith,Jr.,S-Y.Tong: Minimizing Power Transmission Losses by Reactive–Volt-Ampere Control; AIEE Trans. v. 82, 1963, pp. 542–44.
W.O.Stadlin: Criteria for the Control and Economic Dispatch of Reactive Volt Amperes; IEEE/PES Summer Meeting, New Orleans, July 1966, 31PP66–332.
CIGRE Task Force 39.02: Voltage and Reactive Power Control; CIGRE 1992 (39–203)
L.Franchi et al.: Evaluation of Economy and/or Security Oriented Objective Functions for Reactive Power Scheduling in Large Scale Systems; IEEE Trans. v.PAS-102/10, 1983, pp.3481–88
A.Capasso, E.Mariani, C.Sabelli: On the Objective Functions for Reactive Power Optimization; IEEE/PES Winter Meeting, 1980 (paper A80 090–1; abstract appeared in IEEE Trans. v.PAS-99, n.4, July/August 1980, p. 1326 )
CIGRE Task Force 38.02.03: Improvement of Voltage Control; Electra, n. 135, April 1991, pp. 117–27.
D.N.Ewart: Automatic Generation Control, Performance under normal conditions; Systems Engineering for Power–Status and Prospects, U.S.-E.R.D.A. Conf.-750867 (76–66), 1975, pp. 1–14.
F.R.Schleif: Interconnected Power Systems Operation at Below Normal Frequency; EPRI Report EL-976, February 1979.
L.S.VanSlyck, N.Jaleeli, W.R.Kelley: A Comprehensive Shakedown of an Automatic Generation Control Process; IEEE Trans. v.PWRS-4 n. 2, 1989, pp. 771–81.
IEEE/PES Working Group: Current Operational Problems Associated with Automatic Generation Control; IEEE Trans. v.PAS-98 n.1, Jan. 1979, pp. 88–96.
J.Zaborszky, J.Singh: A Reevaluation of the Normal Operating State Control of the Power System Using Computer Control and System Theory; Proc. 11 the IEEE/PES PICA,1979, pp.205–13.
C.Concordia: “Effect of Prime-Mover Speed Control Characteristics on Electric Power System Performance,” IEEE Trans. v.PAS-88 n. 5, May 1969, pp. 752–54.
L.H.Fink: Ancillary Transmission Services; Elec. Jour., v,9/5, June 1996, pp. 18–25.
L.H.Fink: Security - Its Meaning and Objectives; Proc. Intl Symp. on Power System Security Assessment,Ames, Iowa, 27–29 April, pp.35–41
N.Balu et al.: On-Line Power System Security Analysis; Proc. IEEE, v. 80 /2, Feb. 1992, pp. 262–80.
B.Avramovic, L.H.Fink: Real-Time Reactive Security Monitoring; IEEE Trans. v.PS-7/1, 1992, pp.432–37.
F.F.Wu, P.Varaiya: Coordinated Multilateral Trades for Electric Power Networks — Theory and Implementation; Rpt. PWP-031, June 1995, Univ. of Cal. Energy Inst., Berkeley, Cal.
M.D.Ilic, F.Graves: Optimal Use of Ancillary Generation under Open Access and its Possible Implementation; TR 95–006, Mass. Inst. of Tech., Lab. for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, August 1995.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fink, L.H. (1998). New Control Paradigms for Deregulation. In: Power Systems Restructuring. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2883-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2883-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5038-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2883-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive