Advertisement

Partnerships and Networks as Self-Organizing Systems: an Antidote to Principal-Agent Theory

  • Tony Bovaird
  • Sudi Sharifi
Chapter

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of self-organization, by means of which groups of agents accommodate each other, acquire collective properties which they could not individually possess, and achieve outcomes which they value, without anyone being in charge or consciously planning it. This concept, developed in the natural sciences, appears to fly in the face of ‘the incessant forces of dissolution described by the second law of thermodynamics’ (Waldrop, 1994: 102). It also offers the prospect of an alternative viewpoint on how action can be mobilized to that offered by principal-agent theory.

Keywords

Network Member County Level Human System Complex Adaptive System Parish Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K. “The economics of agency”. In Principals and Agents: the Structure of Business, Pratt, J.W. and Zeckhauser, R.J., eds. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Co-operation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. Bovaird, T. Managing urban economic development: learning to change or the marketing of failure? Urban Studies 1994;31(4/5):573–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bovaird, T., Green, J., M. Steve, Millward, A., Tricker, M. Evaluation of Rural Action: Three Year Assessment of Cost-Effectiveness. Birmingham: Aston Business School, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, J.C. and Porras, J.I. Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. New York: Harper Business, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Dixit, A.K. and Nalebuff, B.J. Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics, and Everyday Life. New York: W.W. Norton, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. Friend, J., Power, J. M. and Yewlett, CJ. L. Public Planning: the Inter-corporate Dimension. London: Tavistock, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. Gomes-Cassares, B. Group versus group: how alliance networks compete. Harvard Business Review July- August, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Huxham, C. and Vangen, S. Naivete and maturity, inertia and fatigue: are working relationships between public organisations doomed to fail? Paper presented at The Contract State: the Future of Public Management, Employment Research Unit Conference, University of Cardiff, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. Kooiman, J. “Governance and governability: using complexity, dynamics and diversity”. In Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, Kooiman, J., ed. London: Sage, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Lorange, P. and Probst G.J.B. Joint ventures as self-organising systems: a key to successful joint venture design and implementation. Columbia Journal of World Business 1987;22–2.Google Scholar
  12. Meyer, M.W. and Zucker, L.G. Permanently Failing Organisations. Newbury Park: Sage, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame: How Companies Succeed or Fail. New York: Free Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. Parker, D. and Stacey, R. Chaos, Management and Economics: the Implications of Non-linear Thinking. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. Perrow, C. “Small-firm networks”. In Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form and Action, Nohria, N. and Eccles, R.G, eds. Boston, Ma.: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Piore, M. and Sabel, C. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  17. Stacey, R.D. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics. London: Pitman, 1993.Google Scholar
  18. Stiglitz, J. Whither Socialism? London: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. Waldrop, M. Complexity: the Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. London: Penguin, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. White, H.C. “Agency as control in formal networks”. In Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form and Action, Nohria, N. and Eccles, R.G., eds. Boston, Ma.: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tony Bovaird
  • Sudi Sharifi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations