Enhancing the Capability of O & M to Carry Out More Effective Studies

  • Aharon Kfir


The main hypothesis of this paper is that organization and management (O & M) studies carried out by the Israeli Central O & M Unit in the past have been based on an incomplete and limited approach. While both acknowledging the shortcomings of such an approach and recognizing the highly relevant knowledge made available by modern organization and management theory, this paper analyzes a few key problems of the Central O & M Unit and offers some suggestions for concrete changes in its organizational system and approach. It is hoped that the analysis and suggestions will assist in improving the effectiveness of the O & M Units in carrying out their studies and will encourage research for further implementation of new administrative patterns in the study of organization and management.


Policy Efficiency Public Sector Organization Automatic Data Processing Foreign Expert Auditor General 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alford, J., O’ Neill, D. The Contract State. Victoria: Deakin University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Association of Consulting Management Engineers. Personal Qualifications of Management Consultants. N.Y.: P.M.A., 1959.Google Scholar
  3. Auditor General of Canada. Attributes of Well-Performing Organizations. Office of the Auditor General. Ottawa, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. Ault, O.E. Report on Training and O & M f or the Civil Service of Israel. Jerusalem: Civil Service Commission, 1959.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. et al. Productivity in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. Carter, N., Klein, R., Day, P. How Organizations Measure Success. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Champy, J.R. Re-engineering Management: The Mandate for New Leadership. New York: Harper-Collins, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Downs, G., Larkey, P. The Search for Government Efficiency: From Hubris to Helplessness. New York: Random House, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. Dunshire, A. Organization and Management of State and Administration. SICA Second Occasional Paper Series, No. 1, ASPA, Washington, DC, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Efficiency Unit, Improving Management in Government.The Next Steps. H.M.S.O., London, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. Feldman, D. Reforming Government. New York: Morrow, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. Fry, G. et al., Symposium on Improving Management in Government. Public Administration 1988;Vol. 66, No. 4:429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halachmi, A. Re-engineering and public management: Some issues and considerations. International Review of Administrative Services 1995;Vol. 61:329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halachmi, A., Bouckaert, G. The challenge of productivity in a changing world. International Review of Admini strative Sciences, 59,1993.Google Scholar
  15. Hälzer, M., Halachmi, A. (eds.). Strategic Issues in Public Sector Productivity. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Hoover, D.F. “Internal Consulting.” In Public Productivity Handbook, Hälzer, M. ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. Israel Civil Service Commission. Position Classification Standards. Series GEN. Jerusalem, 1965.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, R.A., Käst, F.E., Rozenzweig, J.F. The Theory and Management of Systems. New York: McGraw Hill, 1963.Google Scholar
  19. March, J.G., Simon, H. Organization. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1958.Google Scholar
  20. Measuring Productivity of Federal Government Organizations. Washington: Bureau of Budget, 1964.Google Scholar
  21. Mayo-Smith, I., Ruther, N.L. Achieving Improved Performance in Public Organization: A Guide for Managers, West Hartford, CT: Kumariano Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  22. O’Sullivan, E., Rassel, G.R. Research Methods. In Public Administration. 2nd editional. New York: Longman, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. Parkinson, C, Northcote. Parkinson’s Law. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1957.Google Scholar
  24. Pollitt, C, Bouckaert, F. eds. Quality Improvement in European Public Services. Ch. 2, London: Sage, 1995.Google Scholar
  25. Stone, D.C. “Applying Management Knowledge.” In Elements of Public Administration, Fritz Morstine Marx, ed. New York: Prentice Hall, 1959.Google Scholar
  26. Tirole, J. The Internal Organization of Government. Oxford Economic Papers 1994;46:1–29.Google Scholar
  27. United Nations. Handbook on the Improvement of Administrative Management in Public Administration. New York: ST/ESA/SERE/19, 1979.Google Scholar
  28. Wholey, J. et al. eds. Improving Government Performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aharon Kfir

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations