Skip to main content

Solution Methods

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 18))

Abstract

The maximum principle analysis conducted in the previous chapter yields qualitative information about the extremal behavior of flexible manufacturing systems. Until now we examined typical elements (regimes) of optimal “scheduling trajectories” and the production conditions necessary for their appearance. It was easy to predict that the analytical information would be insufficient for developing the optimal schedule for the large class of FMS modeled and studied in the previous chapters. The calculation of the optimal schedule can be done analytically only for special cases of small-dimensional manufacturing systems. For example, assuming constant demand rate and linear or quadratic surplus/backlog cost dependencies, the limit cycles and transition corridors can be found analytically for one-machine, two-product scheduling problems. In section 7.2, we present an analytical solution approach to solving one-machine, multiple-part-type problems under constant-in-time demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Caramanis, M., A. Sharifnia, J. Hu and S. Gershwin, 1991, “Development of a Science Base for Planning and Scheduling Manufacturing Systems” in Proceedings ofthe 1991 NSF Design and Manufacturing Systems Conference, Austin, Texas, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, C. and P. Ramadge, 1992, “On Real-Time Scheduling Policies for Flexible Manufacturing Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37(4), 491–496.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, S., Y. Dallery and S. Gershwin, 1992, “A Real-time Policy for Performing Setup Changes in a Manufacturing System”, in Proceedings of the 31 st IFEE Conference on Decision and Control , Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, G., 1987, “The Economic Lot Scheduling Problem: Achieving Flexibility Using Time-Varying Lot Sizes”, Operations Research, 35, 764–771.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elhafsi, M. and S. Bai, 1996, “Transient and Steady-State Analysis of a Manufacturing System with Setup Changes”. Journal ofGlobal Optimization, 8, 349–378.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J, 1994, “Optimal and Near-Optimal Scheduling in Flow Control Problems”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Mfg. Engineering, Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. and M. Caramanis, 1995, “Dynamic Set-Up Scheduling of Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Design and Stability of Near Optimal General Round Robin Policies”, in Discrete Event Systems, IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications Series, P.R. Kumar and P.P. Varaiya Editors, Springer-Verlag, 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimemia, J. G. and S. B. Gershwin, 1983, “An Algorithm for the Computer Control of a Flexible Manufacturing Svstern” IIE Transactions 15(4)353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khmelnitsky, E, K. Kogan and O. Maimon, 1995, “A Maximum Principle-Based Combined Method for Scheduling in a Flexible Manufacturing System”, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 5, 343–355.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khmelnitsky, E, K. Kogan and O. Maimon, 1997, “Maximum Principle-based Methods for Production Scheduling with Partially Sequence-dependent Setups”, International Journal ofProduction Research, 35(10), 2701–2712.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Milyutin, AA., N. Osmolovsky, S. Chukanov and A. Ilyutovich, 1993, Optimal Control in Linear Systems, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J. R. and P. R. Kumar, 1989, “Stable, Distributed, Real-Time Scheduling of Flexible Manufacturing/Assembly/Disassemble”, IEFE Transactions on Automatic Control, 34(2), pp. 139–148.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifnia, A., M. Caramanis and S. Gershwin, 1991, “Dynamic Setup Scheduling and Flow Control in Manufacturing Systems”, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 1, 149–175.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maimon, O., Khmelnitsky, E., Kogan, K. (1998). Solution Methods. In: Optimal Flow Control in Manufacturing Systems. Applied Optimization, vol 18. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2834-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2834-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4799-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2834-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics