Advertisement

The Position of Small States in the EU

  • Sasha Baillie
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to answer the question regarding the position of small states in the EU. Yet before this issue can be addressed the exact meaning of ‘position’ needs to be clarified. The term „position“ refers to the ability of the small state to achieve its aims in the EU. Hence, the determination of position is an assessment of how the small state behaves in order to achieve its goals, and what means it disposes of inside the EU to obtain what i wants.

Keywords

Small State Institutionalist Theory Founding Member European Economic Community Coalition Partner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Renate Mayntz and Fritz Scharpf: Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalis-mus’, in: Renate Mayntz and Fritz Scharpf (eds.) (1995): Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, Frankfurt/New York (Campus), pp. 39–72.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertrand Russell: The Forms of Power, in: Stephen Lukes (ed.) (1986): Power. New York (New York University Press), p. 19. Reprinted from Bertrand Russell (1938): Power. A New Social Analysis, London (Allen & Unwin); Unwin Paperbacks (1975), chapter 3, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robert J. Mokken and Frans N. Stokman: Power and Influence as Political Phenomena, in: Brian Barry (ed.) (1976): Power and Political Theory. Some European Perspectives, London (John Wiley), pp. 33–54.Google Scholar
  4. 3a.
    David Baldwin (1989): Paradoxes of Power, New York (Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    France and Germany Struggle to Turn Their European Dreams into Reality, in: Financial Times (14–15 December 1996); A Compromise on Stability, in: Financial Times (16 December 1996).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Emile Krier: L’industrie lourde luxembourgeoise et le Plan Schuman, in: Klaus Schwabe (ed.) (1988): The Beginnings of the Schuman Plan, Baden-Baden (Nomos Verlag), pp. 357–366.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Stephen Krasner (1988): Sovereignty. An Institutional Perspective, in: Comparative Political Studies (vol. 21), pp. 66–94.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Jean Burner (13 June 1997): L’UE renonce à réformer en profondeur ses institutions avant les négociations sur l’élargissement, in: Agence France Presse.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Gilbert Trausch: L’heure européenne qui fait d’une ville de province un carrefour européen, in: Gilbert Trausch (ed.) (1994): La Ville de Luxembourg. Du Château des Comtes à la Métropole Européenne, Anvers (Fonds Mercator), pp. 372–459; Sasha Baillie (1996:28): The Seat of the European Institutions. An Example of Small State Influence in European Decision-Making (European University Institute Working Paper Robert Schumann Center), Florence.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    George Tsebelis (1990): Nested Games. Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Berkeley (University of California Press).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Samuel B. Bacharach and Edward J. Lawler (1988): Bargaining. Power, Tactics and Outcomes, San Francisco (Jossey-Bass Publishers).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Bachard/Lawler (1988) (see note no. 10).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Möglichst harmlos wirken, in: Der Spiegel (3 November 1997), p. 4LGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    Helen Wallace: Making Multilateral Negotiations Work, in: William Wallace (ed.) (1990): Dynamics of European integration, London (Pinter), pp. 213–228.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Thomas C. Schelling (1960): The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge/Massachusetts (Harvard University).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sasha Baillie

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations