Summary of the Issues Discussed

  • Pieter Jan Stallen
  • Wim van Hengel
  • Richard Jorissen
Part of the Technology, Risk, and Society book series (RISKGOSO, volume 12)


The workshop was convened to shed light on a relatively new development in modeling (third-party) safety, namely the assessment of societal risk (= SR). The ultimate question regarding safety in general and, thus, SR as well is: “How safe is safe enough?”. In his opening speech Werring 1 stressed that in the end decisions about risk, e.g. whether to transport dioxines/furanes by rail or road, are political decisions, however whimsical they may seem. On the other hand, he stated, policy makers need scientific information on safety that can help them to reach more objective judgements on this type of problems and solutions in safety-management.


Risk Aversion Accident Data Societal Risk Collective Risk Event Tree Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Douglas, M. and A. Wildaysky (1982) Risk and Culture Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Evans, A.W. and N.Q. Verlander (1996) What is wrong with criterion FN-lines for judging the tolerability of risk? London: Centre for Transport studies.Google Scholar
  3. Fischhoff, B. et al. (1981) Acceptable risk,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. IChem (1985) Nomenclature for hazard and risk assessment in the process industries, Rugby/Warwickshire: Institution of Chemical Engineeers.Google Scholar
  5. Keeney, R.L. (1990) Mortality risks induced by economic expenditures, Risk Analysis, 10 (1), p. 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Morgan, M.G. and M. Henrion (1990) Uncertainty; a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Paté Cornell, M.E. (1966) Uncertainties in risk analysis: six levels of treatment, Reliability engineering and system safety, 54, 95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pikaar, M.J. and M.A. Seaman (1995) A review of risk control, The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Physical planning and Environment (Seriesno. SVS-27A)Google Scholar
  9. Smets, H. (1966) Frequency distribution of the consequences of accidents involving hazardous substances in OECD countries, Etudes et Dossiers, Geneva: Geneva Association (March).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter Jan Stallen
  • Wim van Hengel
  • Richard Jorissen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations