Advertisement

Regional Trading Blocs and Manufacturing Strategies in the European Union, Mercosur, and NAFTA

  • Chris Voss
Chapter

Abstract

World-wide, nations are combining into trading blocs to gain the benefits of open markets, the harmonisation of standards and the creation of larger markets. The countries in the IMSS study represent three of the world’s largest trading blocs, the European Union (EU), the new Southern Common Market (Mercosur), and the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA). These trading blocs have many similarities, but they also have many differences in their objectives and in the mix and starting points of the nations involved.

Keywords

European Union European Central Bank Monetary Union Custom Union Maastricht Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991) `Convergence across states and regions’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activities, 1, 107–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borensztein, E., DeGregorio, J., and Lee, J-W. (1995) `How does foreign investment affect economic growth?’, NBER Working Paper No. 5057, Cambridge, MA, March.Google Scholar
  3. Boulton, P. and Roland, G. (1996) `Distributional conflicts, factor mobility, and political integration’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May, 99–104.Google Scholar
  4. Campa, J., and Goldberg, L.S. (1997) `The evolving external orientation of manufacturing industries: evidence from four countries’, NBER Working Paper No. 5919, February.Google Scholar
  5. Doughtery, C. and Jorgenson, D.W. (1996) `International comparisons of the sources of economic growth’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May, 25–29.Google Scholar
  6. Finlay, R. (1996) `Modelling global interdependence: centers, peripheries, and frontiers’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May 1996, 47–51.Google Scholar
  7. Frankel, J., Stein, E., and Shang-Jin, W. (1995) `Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural, and the supernatural’, Journal of Development Economics, 47, 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frankel, J.A., Stein, E., and Shang-Jin, W. (1996) `Regional trading arrangements: natural or supernatural’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May, 52–56.Google Scholar
  9. Grimwade, N. (1989) International Trade: New Patterns of Trade, Production and Investment, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Irwin, D.A. `The United States in a new global economy? A century’s perspective’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May, 41–45.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, R.W. and Engerman, S.L. (1996) `Trade, technology and wages: a tale of two countries’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May, 35–40.Google Scholar
  12. Kruger, A.O. (1997) `Trade policy and economy development: how we learn’, NBER Working Paper No. 5896, January.Google Scholar
  13. Perotti, R. `Fiscal consolidation in Europe: composition matters’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May, 105–110.Google Scholar
  14. Perroni, C., and Whalley, J. (1996) `How severe is global retaliation risk under increasing regionalism?’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 2, May, 57–61.Google Scholar
  15. Wonnacott, R.J., `Free-trade arrangements: for better or worse?’ AEA Papers and Proceedings,86, 2, May, 62–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Voss
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Operations ManagementLondon Business SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations