Applications of Identity Coefficients
The current chapter discusses some applications of kinship and condensed identity coefficients. We commence with the simplest problem of genetic risk prediction involving just two relatives. This setting is artificial because practical genetic counseling usually takes into account information on a whole pedigree rather than information on just a single relative. We will revisit the question of genetic counseling when we explore algorithms for computing pedigree likelihoods.
KeywordsRisk Ratio Marker Locus Marker Allele Grand Statistic Robust Linkage
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Grimmett GR, Stirzaker DR (1992) Probability and Stochastic Processes, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Pericak-Vance MA, Bebout JL, Gaskell PC Jr, Yamaoka LH, Hung W-Y, Alberts MJ, Walker AP, Barlett RJ, Haynes CA, Welsh KA, Earl NL, Heyman A, Clark CM, Roses AD (1991) Linkage studies in familial Alzheimer disease: evidence for chromosome 19 linkage. Amer J Hum Genet 48:1034–1050Google Scholar
- Risch N (1990) Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. Amer J Hum Genet 46:22–228Google Scholar
- Thompson EA (1986) Pedigree Analysis in Human Genetics. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Weeks DE, Lange K (1988) The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. Amer J Hum Genet 42:315–326Google Scholar
- Weeks DE, Lange K (1992) A multilocus extension of the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. Amer J Hum Genet 50:859–868Google Scholar