A Short History of the Institutionalization of Involuntary Sexual Mutilation in the United States

  • Frederick Hodges


For the past 130 years, the American medical industry has been involved in the business of removing part or all of the external sexual organs of male and female children. While the origin of sexual mutilation among prehistoric primitive peoples is a matter for theory and speculation, the origin and spread of sexual mutilation in American medical practice can be precisely documented. Seen in the proper context of the entire scope of Western history, the modern American enigma of institutionalized sexual mutilation is an historic aberration of profound significance and degree, one that could never have been predicted, and one that perhaps could not have been avoided.


American Medical Association Acquire Immune Deficiency Syndrome Venereal Disease Penile Cancer Female Circumcision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Szasz TS. Law, Liberty, and Psychiatry. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. 1989: 212.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bichat X. General anatomy, applied to physiology and medicine. 2 vols. Boston: Richardson and Lord. 1822.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broussais F JV. A treatise on physiology applied to psychology. Philadelphia: H.C. Carey and I. Lea. 1826.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deslandes L. De l’onanisme et des autres abus vénériens considérés dans leurs rapports avec la santé. Paris: A. Lelarge. 1835.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lallemand C-F. Des pertes séminales involontaires. Paris: Béchet Jeune, 1836: 465–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dixon E H. A treatise on diseases of the sexual organs. New York: Burgess, Stringer, 1845: 158–165.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Editor. Tying the spermatic artery. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1842; 26: 321.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crosby J. Seminal weakness–castration. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1843; 29: 10–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McMinn SN. Insanity cured by excision of the external organs of generation. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1845; 32: 131–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor WT. Castration: recovery, followed by phthisis pulmonalis. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 1855; 30: 85–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Editor. Castration for masturbation. Medical Record 1894; 46: 534.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilbert J A. An unusual case of masturbation. Medical Record 1915; 88: 608–10.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haynes T. Surgical treatment of hopeless cases of masturbation and nocturnal emissions. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1883; 109: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clark AC, Clark HE. Neurectomy: a preventive of masturbation. Lancet 1899; 2: 838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M’Cassey JH. Adolescent insanity and masturbation: with exsection of certain nerves supplying the sexual organs as the remedy. Cincinnati Lancet-Clinic 1896; 37: 341–3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edson B. Concerning a case for circumcision. Medical World 1902; 20: 476–7.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ford. Cauterization by injection for spermaton-haea. Transactions of the American Medical Association 1851; 4: 264.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garwood A. Onanism in a boy seven years old. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 1854; 27: 553–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keating JM. Masturbation. In: Cyclopxdia of the Diseases of Children, Medical and Surgical. Vol. III. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1890: 710.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Warren CE. Genocatachresia. St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal 1892; 63: 201–15.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kellogg JH. Plain facts for old and young. Burlington, Iowa: I.F. Segner, 1888: 295–6.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Flood E. An appliance to prevent masturbation. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1888; 119: 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Editor. Masturbation harness. Medical World 1910; 28: 133.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Editor. Treatment of spermatorrhcea. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1861; 48: 121.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cooper ES. Excision of the clitoris as a cure for masturbation. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1862; 66: 164.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Editor. Clitoridectomy. Medical Record 1867; 2: 71.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hutchinson J. On the influence of circumcision in preventing syphillis. Medical Times and Gazette 1855; 2; 542.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hirschfeld J. The jewish circumcision before a medical tribunal. American Medical Monthly 1858; 9: 272–5.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    White. Phimosis in new-born children. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1861; 65: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bliss C. Spermatornccea–a new method of treatment. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1868; 77: 536–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arnold AB. Circumcision. New York Medical Journal 1869; 9: 514–24.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fishbein M (ed). A History of the American Medical Association, 1847–1847, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co, 1947: 636–7.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sayre LA. Partial paralysis from reflex irritation, caused by congenital phimosis and adherent prepuce. Transactions of the American Medical Association 1870; 21: 205–11.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sayre LA. Circumcision Versus Epilepsy, Etc. Medical Record 1870; 5: 233–4.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heckford N. Circumcision as a remedial measure in certain cases of epilepsy, chorea, &c. Clinical Lectures and Reports by the Medical and Surgical Staff of the London Hospital 1865; 2: 58–64.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sayre L A. Spinal anæmia with partial paralysis and want of coordination, from irritation of the genital organs. Transactions of the American Medical Association 1875; 26: 255–74.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jacobi A. On masturbation and hysteria in young children. American Journal of Obstetrics 1876; 8: 595–606.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moses MJ. The value of circumcision as a hygienic and therapeutic measure. New York Medical Journal 1871; 14: 368–74.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spratling EJ. Masturbation in the adult. Medical Record 1895; 45: 442–3.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fisher CE. Circumcision. In: A hand-book on the diseases of children and their homeopathic treatment. Chicago: Medical Century Co, 1895: 875.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gentry WD. Nervous derangements produced by sexual irregularities in boys. Medical Current 1890; 6: 268–74.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Editor. The advantages of circumcision. Medical News 1900; 77: 707–8.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mark EG. Circumcision. American Practitioner and News 1901; 31: 122–6.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Taylor AS. Case of congenital phimosis leading to death at the age of 83. Lancet 1891; 1: 1040.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wolbarst AL. Persistent masturbation. Journal of the American Medical Association 1932; 90: 154–5.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wolbarst AL. Universal circumcision as a sanitary measure. Journal of the American Medical Association 1914; 62: 92–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wolbarst AL. Universal circumcision as a sanitary measure. Journal of the American Medical Association 1914; 62: 92–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wolbarst A L. Does circumcision in infancy protect against disease? Virginia Medical Monthly 1934; 60: 723–8.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wolbarst AL. Circumcision and penile cancer. Lancet 1932; 1: 150–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bazett HC, McGlone B, Williams RG, Lufkin HM. Sensation: I. depth, distribution and probable identification in the prepuce of sensory end-organs concerned in sensations of temperature and touch; thermometric conductivity. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 1932; 27: 489–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Diebert GA. The separation of the prepuce in the human penis. Anatomical Record 1933; 57: 387–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hunter RH. Notes on the development of the prepuce. Journal of Anatomy 1935; 70: 68–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Guttmacher AF. Should the baby be circumcised? Parents’ Magazine 1941;16(9): 26, 76–78.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Guttmacher AF. Should the baby be circumcised? Parents’ Magazine 1941;16(9): 26, 76–78.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Guttmacher AF. Should the baby be circumcised? Parents’ Magazine 1941;16(9): 26, 76–78.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ewing J. The causal and formal genesis of cancer. In: Cancer Control. Chicago: The Surgical Publishing Company of Chicago, 1927: 168.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ravich A. The relationship of circumcision to cancer of the prostate. Journal of Urology 1942; 48: 298–9.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Editor. Circumcision vs. cancer. Newsweek 1943; 21: 110–1.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Who’s Who in America. 42nd edition. 1982–1983. volume 2. Chicago: Marquis Who’s Who, 1982/83:2752.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gerber ML. Some practical aspects of circumcision. United States Navy Medical Bulletin 1944; 42: 1147–9.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Heimoff LL. Venereal disease control program. Bulletin of the United States Army Medical Department 1945; 3: 93–100.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hand EA. Circumcision and venereal disease. Archives of Dermatatology and Syphilography 1949; 60: 341–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Editor. Circumcision and VD. Newsweek 1947; 30: 49.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision British Medical Journal 1949; 2: 1433–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Miller RL, Synder DC. Immediate circumcision of the newborn male. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1953; 65: 1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    vide: Obstetrics. ed. J.P. Greenhill. 13 edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1960:1049. and: Eatman NJ, Hellman LM, eds. Williams Obstetrics. 12th edition. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961: 1101.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ravich A, Ravich RA. Prophylaxis of cancer of the prostate, penis, and cervix by circumcision. New York State Journal of Medicine 1951; 51: 1519–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wynder EL, Cornfield J, Schroff PD, Doraiswami KR. A study of environmental factors in carcinoma of the cervix. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1954; 68: 1016–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Editor. Circumcision and Cancer. Time 1954; 63: 96–7.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rathmann WG. Female circumcision, indications and a new technique. GP 1959; 20: 115–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dietz O, Dougherty EC. Vergleichende Studie zur Frage der Beschneidung in Deutschland und in den Vereinigten Staaten. Deutsche Gesundheitswesen 1957; 12: 193–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kelämi A. Die sogenannte Gomecotomie als Methode der Wahl für Circumcision. Der Chirurg 1966; 37: 512–3.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Dietz O, Dougherty EC. Vergleichende Studie zur Frage der Beschneidung in Deutschland und in den Vereinigten Staaten. Deutsche Gesundheitswesen 1957; 12: 193–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hofmeister KB. Über erste Erfahrungen mit der routinemäßigen Beschneidung des Neugeborenen in Deutschland und Gedanken zur krebsprophylaxe. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1959; 19: 20–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Koester H. Zur Frage der Zirkumzision neugeborener Knaben. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1963; 23: 934–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Dietz O. Erfahrungsbericht über 2800 Zirkumzisionen. Dermatologische Monatsschrift 1970; 156: 1029–34.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bock JE, Rebbe H. Neonatal Circumcisio. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1973; 135: 1890–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Winkelmann RK. The cutaneous innervation of human newborn prepuce. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1956; 26: 53–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Winkelmann RK. The erogenous zones: their nerve supply and its significance. Proceedings of the Staff Meetings of the Mayo Clinic 1959; 34: 39–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gibson EC. Carcinoma of the prostate in jews and circumcised gentiles. British Journal of Urology 1954; 26: 227–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Stern E, Neely PM. Cancer of the cervix in reference to circumcision and marital history. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association 1962; 17: 739–40.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Govinda Reddy D, Baruah IJSM. Carcinogenic action of human smegma. Archives of Pathology 1963; 75: 414–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Morgan WKC. The rape of the Phallus. Journal of the American Medical Association 1965; 193: 223–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin: incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among danish schoolboys. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1968; 43: 200–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Preston EN. Whither the foreskin? a consideration of routine neonatal circumcision. Journal of the American Medical Association 1970; 213: 1853–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Committee on Fetus and Newbom. Circumcision. In: Hospital Care of Newborn Infants. 5th edition. Evanston, Ill: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1971: 110.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    The Boston Children’s Medical Center. Pregnancy, Birth and the Newborn Baby. Boston: Delacorte Press, 1971: 285.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Pomeranz VE, Schultz D. The Mothers’ and Fathers’ Medical Encyclopedia. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1977: 109.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Livermore B. Like father, like son. Health 1987; 19: 15.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Barton S. Your Child’s Health. New York: Bantam Books, 1991: 113–8.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Masters WH, Johnson VE, Kolodny RC. Human Sexuality. 4th edition. New York: HarperCollins, 1992: 58–9.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Miller MA, Drakonitides AB, Leavell LC (eds). Kimber-Gray-Stackpole’s Anatomy and Physiology 17th edition. New York: Macmillan, 1977: 577.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Snell RS. Atlas of Clinical Anatomy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 1978: 136.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Campbell MF. The male genital tract and the female urethra. In: Campbell MF, Harrison JH, eds. Urology. vol. 2. Third edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1970: 1836.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Campbell MF. The male genital tract and the female urethra. In: Campbell MF, Harrison JH, eds. Urology. vol. 2. Third edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1970: 1836.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Burger R, Guthrie TH. Why Circumcision? Pediatrics. 1974; 54: 362–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Wollman L. Female Circumcision. Journal of the American Society of Psychosomatic Dentistry and Medicine 1973; 20: 130–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Report of the Ad Hoc Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics 1975; 56: 610–1.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Editor. Two suits charge circumcision malpractice. Contemporary Ob/Gyn 1986; 28 (4): 150.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Editor. Calif. suit raises liability questions in circumcision. Ob.Gyn. News 1986;21(22):1,18 passim.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Editor. Two suits charge circumcision malpractice. Contemporary Ob/Gyn 1986; 28 (4): 150.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Ginsburg CM, McCracken GH, Jr. Urinary tract infections in young infants. Pediatrics 1982; 69: 409–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Wiswell TE, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1985; 75: 901–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Fink AJ. In defense of circumcision. Pediatrics 1986; 77: 265–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Wiswell TE. Reply to: In defense of circumcision. Pediatrics 1986; 77: 266–7.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    McCracken GH Jr. Options in antimicrobial management of urinary tract infections in infants and children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1989; 8: 552–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Burch FW. Baby Sense. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991: 226.Google Scholar
  108. I08.
    Santesteban A. Child Care for the 80s. Bedford: ABC & I Press, 1993: 18.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Dollemore D, Holman M, Kaufman BP, et al. Symptoms: Their Causes & Cures. Emmaus: Rodale Press, 1994: 199.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Monmaney R, Raine G. Doubts about circumcision: fewer boys are now cut. Newsweek 1987; 109: 74.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Silberner J, Carey J. Circumcision. U.S. News and World Report 1988; 104: 68.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Rand CS, Emmons CA, Johnson JWC. The effect of an educational intervention on the rate of neonatal circumcision. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983; 62: 64–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Bean GO, Egelhoff C. Neonatal circumcision: when is the decision made? Journal of Family Practice 1984; 18: 883–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Lovell JE, Cox J. Maternal attitudes toward circumcision. Journal of Family Practice 1979; 9: 811–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Eriksen NH, Poulsen PN, Friis HM, Vejlsgaard R. Urinary tract infectionsm etiology, diagnosis and treatment with effective antibiotics. Nordisk Medicin 1989; 104 (2): 35–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Shabad AL, Minakov NK, Mkrtchan GG, et al. The pathogenesis and prevention of urinary tract infection in women. Urologiia I Nefrologiia 1995;(4):8–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics 1989; 83: 1011–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Wiswell TE. Routine neonatal circumcision: a reappraisal. American Family Physician 1990; 41: 859–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Ahmann S. Academy holds fast to position on circumcision. Pediatric News 1986; 20: 38–9.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Task Force on Circumcision. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1989; 84: 388–91.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Schoen EJ. Is it time for Europe to reconsider newborn circumcision? Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1991; 80: 573–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Bollgren I, Winberg J. Reply to: Is it time for Europe to reconsider newborn circumcision? Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1991; 80: 575–7.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Fink AJ. A possible explanation for heterosexual male infection with AIDS. New England Journal of Medicine 1986; 315: 1167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Fink AJ. Is hygiene enough? Circumcision as a possible strategy to prevent neonatal group B streptococcal disease. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988; 159: 534.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Fink AJ. Circumcision and sand. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1991; 84: 696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Manson B. Forget pork bellies, now it’s foreskins. San Diego Reader (May 4, 1995): l2, 14 passim.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Brewer S. New skin twin life-and look-save. Longevity (September 1992): 18.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Rosenberg R. Companies see $1.5b market in replacement skin products. Boston Globe (October 19, 1992 ): 22–23.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Hall CT. Biotech’s Big Discovery. San Francisco Chronicle. October 25, 1996: E1, E4.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. British Journal of Urology 1996; 77: 291–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Australian College of Paediatrics. Position statement: routine circumcision of normal male infants and boys. Australian College of Paediatrics. 27/05/96.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. Clinical practice guidelines: Neonatal circumcision revisited. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1996; 154: 769–80.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Menage J. Male Genital Mutilation. British Medical Journal 1993; 307: 686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Sorger L. To ACOG: stop circumcisions. OB.GYN.News I994;(November 1 ): 8.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Fleiss PM. Female circumcision. New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 322: 189.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Mullick S. Circumcision. British Medical Journal 1995; 310: 259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Warren JP, Smith PD, Dalton JD, et al. Circumcision of children. British Medical Journal 1996; 312: 377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Fleiss PM. More on circumcision. Clinical Pediatrics 1995; 34: 623–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! 2nd edition. Aptos: Hourglass, 1995: 89–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick Hodges

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations