Advertisement

A Cognitive Corroborative Case Study Approach for Investigating Discovered Memories of Sexual Abuse

  • Jonathan W. Schooler
  • Zara Ambadar
  • Miriam Bendiksen
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 291)

Abstract

In recent years, memory researchers have convincingly illustrated the dangerous role that suggestion may play in inducing fabricated memories of childhood trauma. Although post-event suggestion had long been known to alter the recollection of details of events (e.g., Loftus, Miller, & Burns, 1978; Schooler, Gerhard, & Loftus, 1986), recent research has demonstrated that experimenter suggestions can cause the vivid recollection of events that never occurred (Ceci, Loftus, Leichtman, & Bruck, 1994; Hyman, 1995; Loftus & Ketcham, 1994). Suggestions can even cause individuals to falsely recall being repeatedly exposed to negative situations that are unlikely to have ever happened (see Lindsay, this volume). The documented power of suggestion to induce memories of experiences that never occurred is especially alarming in light of the suggestive techniques that a minority of therapists are known to use with their clients in pursuit of forgotten memories of abuse (e.g., Polusny & Follette, 1996; Poole, Lindsay, Memon, & Bull, 1995; Yapko, 1994). If individuals can be induced to recall false memories under the modest persuasive pressures used in the laboratory, one can only imagine the dangers of therapy settings in which potentially unwarranted suggestions of abuse are made: 1) by a trusted authoritative figure; 2) over potentially years of sessions, and; 3) with a patient who may be particularly suggestible either due to hypnosis (cf. Lynn, this volume) or as a natural consequence of their dissociative tendencies (cf. Hyman & Billings, 1995) which are commonly associated with patients “diagnosed” as likely victims of abuse.

Keywords

Sexual Abuse Childhood Sexual Abuse False Memory Childhood Trauma Hindsight Bias 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., and Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 304–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fischoff, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristic and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty.’ Heuristic and biases (pp. 335–351 ). New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gick, M. L., and Lockhart, R. S. (1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight. In R.J. Sternberg, and J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 197–228 ). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Harvey, M. R., and Herman, J. L. (1994). Amnesia, partial amnesia and delayed recall among adult survivors of childhood trauma. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hyman, I. E. (1995). False memories of childhood experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 181–197.Google Scholar
  6. Hyman, I. E. and Billings, F. J. (1995). Individual differences and the creation offalse childhood memories. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  7. Kihlstorm, J. F. (1996). The trauma-memory argument and recovered memory therapy. In K. Pezdek, and W. R Banks (Eds). The recovered memory/false memory debate, (pp. 297–311 ), San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lindsay, D. S., and Read, J. D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of child sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 281–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindsay, D. S., and Read, J. D. (1995). “Memory work” and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional, and personal issues. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 4, 846–908.Google Scholar
  10. Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loftus, E., and Ketcham, K. (1994). The myth of repressed memory: False memories and allegations of sexual abuse. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  12. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., and Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, R. E. Morris, and R. N. Sykes (Eds), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3–24 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Polusny, M. A., and Follette, V. M. (1996). Remembering childhood sexual abuse: A national survey of psychologists’ clinical practices, beliefs, and personal experiences. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 1, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pezdek, K., and Banks W. R. (1996). The recovered memory/false memory debate. (Eds). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Poole, D. A., Lindsay, D. S., Memon, A., and Bull, R. (1995). Psychotherapy and the recovery of memories of childhood sexual abuse: U.S. and British practitioners beliefs, practices, and experiences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 426–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96(2), 341–357.Google Scholar
  18. Schooler, J. (1994). Seeking the core: Issues and evidence surrounding recovered accounts of sexual trauma. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schooler, J., Bendiksen, M., and Ambadar, Z. (in press). Taking the middle line: Can we accommodate both fabricated memories and recovered memories of sexual abuse? In M. Conway (Ed). Recovered Memories and False Memories (pp. 401–456). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schooler, J. W., Fallshore, M. F., and Fiore, S. M. (1995). Epilogue: Putting insight into perspective. In R. J. Sternberg, and J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 559–587). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., and Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 71–181.Google Scholar
  22. Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Tulving, E., and Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tulving, E., and Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yapko, M. (1994). Suggestions of abuse: Real and imagined memories. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan W. Schooler
    • 1
  • Zara Ambadar
    • 1
  • Miriam Bendiksen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Bendiksen and BendiksenSandefjordNorway

Personalised recommendations