Advertisement

Attrition and Response Effects in the Dutch National Mobility Panel

  • Henk Meurs
  • Geert Ridder
Part of the Transportation Research, Economics and Policy book series (TRES)

Abstract

In this chapter, we study the effects of under-reporting and attrition on inferences from the Dutch National Mobility Panel. Using refreshment samples, we assess the biases in the panel. We also investigate potential sources of bias, and distinguish between response effects and selective attrition. We use a random effects stochastic censoring model and exploratory methods to estimate the size of the attrition bias. We indicate some limitations on the type of inferences from the panel, and discuss possibilities to minimize attrition bias by choosing an appropriate sample design.

Keywords

Propensity Score Panel Member Response Effect Panel Survey Attrition Bias 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn, H. and Powell., J.L. (1990) Semiparametric Estimation of Censored Selection Models with a Nonparametric Selection Mechanism. Discussion paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  2. Becierrt, S., Gould, W., Lrlard, L. and Welch, F. (1988) The panel study of income dynamics after fourteen years: An evaluation. Journal of Labor Economics, 6, 472–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cosslerr, S.R. (1991) Semiparametric estimation of a regression model with sample selectivity. In Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics,W.A. Barnett et al.,eds., Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–175.Google Scholar
  4. Dubin, J. and Mcfadden, D. (1984) An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica, 52, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hausman, J.A. and Wise, D.A. (1979) Attrition bias in experimental and panel data: The Gary income maintenance experience. Econometrica, 47, 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heck Man, J.J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heckman, J.J. and Singer, B. (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica, 52, 271–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heckman, J.J. (1990) Varieties of selection bias. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 313–319.Google Scholar
  9. Hensiier, D.A. (1989) An assessment of attrition in a multi-wave panel of households. In Urban Dynamics and Spatial Choice Behaviour,J. Hauer et al.,eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
  10. Hsiao, C. (1986) Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Ichatura, H. (1988) Semiparametric Least Squares Estimation of Single Index Models. Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  12. Ichudura, H. and Lee, L.F. (1991) Semiparametric least squares estimation of multiple index models. In Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics,W.A. Barnett et al.,eds., Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–51.Google Scholar
  13. Krr.Ssuita, R. and Bow, P.H.L. (1987) Analysis of attrition biases and trip reporting errors for panel data. Transportation Research, 21A, 287–302.Google Scholar
  14. Lancaster, T. (1992) The Theory of Choice-Based Sampling. Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (mimeo).Google Scholar
  15. Lrrru, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ridder, G. (1990) Attrition in multi-wave panel data. In Panel Data and Labor Market Studies,J. Hartog et al.,eds. North-Holland, pp. 45–69.Google Scholar
  18. Ridder, G. (1992) An empirical evaluation of some models for non-random attrition in panel data. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 3, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vanwissen, L.J.G and Meurs, H.J. (1989) The Dutch Mobility Panel: Experiences and evaluation. Transportation, 16, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Verbeek, M. (1991) The Design of Panel Surveys and the Treatment of Missing Observations. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant, Tilburg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henk Meurs
    • 1
  • Geert Ridder
    • 2
  1. 1.Mu ConsultAmersfoortThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Vakgroep EconometrieFEWEC, Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations