Advertisement

Why Panels for Transportation Planning?

  • Robert E. Paaswell
Part of the Transportation Research, Economics and Policy book series (TRES)

Abstract

In recent years, we have witnessed a significant change in our approach to transportation planning. Emphasis has shifted from adding infrastructure to accommodate increased demand for travel to demand management, more sensitive land uses and multi-modal choices. Household structure and travel needs are also undergoing rapid change. Old planning data and approaches are no longer reliable, and new methods must be instituted. Panels and panel data provide an important tool for policy-makers and for those charged with infrastructure investments. This chapter discusses the factors which call for a new approach to planning, and shows why panels are appropriate tools for decision-making.

Keywords

Planning Process Travel Behavior Public Transit Transportation Planning Road Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Automobile Manufacturers Association. (1994) Motor Vehicle Facts Figures ‘94. American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Cliao, K.-A. (1992) Supplementing a Large-Scale Travel Data Telephone Survey with Panel Survey Data. Paper presented at the First U.S. Conference on Panels for Transportation Planning, Lake Arrowhead, California.Google Scholar
  3. Giuliano, G. and T.F. Gown. (1990) Using longitudinal data for analysis of a short-term transportation demonstration project. Transportation, 17, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kitamura, R. (1990) Panel analysis in transportation planning: An overview. Transportation Research, 24A, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kumar, A. and M. Replogle. (1992) Low-Cost Trip-Purpose Panel Survey: Case Study of Montgomery County, Maryland. Paper presented at the First U.S. Conference on Panels for Transportation Planning, Lake Arrowhead, California.Google Scholar
  6. Meyer, M. and E.J. Miller (1984) Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision Oriented Approach. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Paasweu., R.E. (1989) The New Transportation Planning Process. Urban Transportation Center, University of Illinois, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Van Wissen L.J.G. and H.J. Meurs (1989) The Dutch Mobility Panel: Experiences and evaluation. Transportation, 16, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Weiner, E. (1987) Urban transportation planning since the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1962. Journal of Transportation Engineering (ASCE), 113, 658–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Paaswell
    • 1
  1. 1.City College of New YorkUniversity Transportation Research CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations