Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLC,volume 18))

Abstract

The paper analyzes the impact of a two-level game for water allocations. For a model with two domestic groups and two countries, and with both domestic and international negotiations, Nash bargaining theory is used to derive several propositions on the consequences of different bargaining rules for water allocations. The effect on international negotiations of the ability to commit to having domestic negotiations is examined. The importance of the nature and timing of complementary investments, and whether they are included in negotiations, in affecting the efficiency of the negotiated outcome is also explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrett, Scott, (1994), “Conflict and Cooperation in Managing International Water Resources”, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1303, The World Bank, May.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Binmore, Kenneth, Ariel Rubinstein, and Asher Wolinsky, (1986), “The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling”, Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 2, Summer, 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaudry, M., and M.H. Siddigi, (1987), “Toward a National Water Plan in Bangladesh”, Chapter 34 in Water Resources Policy for Asia, ed., Mohammed Ali George Radosevich, Akbar Ali Khan, Boston, A.A. Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crow, Ben, with Alan Lindquist and David Wilson (1995), Sharing the Ganges : The Politics and Technology of River Development, Sage Publications: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dhillon, P.S. (1983), A Tale of Two Rivers, Chandigarh, Dhillon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, Franklin M., (1995), “The Economics of Water Dispute Resolution, Project Evaluation and Management : An Application to the Middle East” , Water Resources Development, 11, 4, 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedkin, Joseph F., (1987), “International Water Treaties : United States and Mexico” , Chapter 25 in Water Resources Policy for Asia, ed., Mohammed Ali George Radosevich, Akbar Ali Khan, Boston, A.A. Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grossman, Gene and Elhanan Helpman (1995a), “Trade Wars and Trade Talks”, Journal of Political Economy, 103, 4, August, 675–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman Gene and Elhanan Helpman (1995b), “The Politics of Free-Trade Agreements” , American Economic Review, 85, September, 667–690.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grossman, S., and O. Hart, (1986),“The Costs and Benefits of Ownership : A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration”, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 4, August, 691–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harsanyi, J.C., ( 1963), “A Simplified Bargaining for the n-Person Cooperative Game”, International Economic Review, 4, 194–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harsanyi, J.C., (1977), Rational Behaviour and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Iida, Keisuke, (1993), “When and How Do Domestic Constraints Matter ? Two Level Games with Uncertainty”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 3, September, 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Just, Richard E., Sinaia Netanyahu, and John K. Horowitz, (1996), “Water Pricing and Water Allocation in Israel”, processed, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krishna, Vijay, and Roberto Serrano, (1996), “Multilateral Bargaining”, Review of Economic Studies, 63, 1, 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lax, David A., and James K. Sebenius, (1991), “Negotiating Through an Agent”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 3, Septemebr, 474–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lensberg, T., (1988), “Stability and the Nash Solution”, Journal of Economic Theory, 45, 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer, Frederick W., (1992), “Managing Domestic Differences in International Negotiations : The Strategic Use of Internal Side-Payments”, International Organization, 46, 4, Autumn, 793–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mo, Jongryn, (1995), “Domestic Institutions and International Bargaining : The Role of Agent Veto in Two-Level Games”, American Political Science Review, 89, December 914–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. National Water Development Agency, (1992), National Perspectives for Water Resources Development, July, New Delhi: NWDA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Putnam, Robert D., (1988), “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics : The Logic of TwoLevel Games” , International Organization, 42, 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramana, M.V.V., (1992), Inter-State River Water Disputes in India, Madras: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rubinstein, Ariel, (1982), “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model, Econometrica, 50, 1, 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schelling, Thomas, (1960), The Strategy of Confict, Oxford and London : Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. World Bank, (1993), Water Resources Management : A World Bank Policy Paper. Washington, D.C. : The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richards, A., Singh, N. (1997). Two Level Negotiations in Bargaining Over Water. In: Parthasarathy, T., Dutta, B., Potters, J.A.M., Raghavan, T.E.S., Ray, D., Sen, A. (eds) Game Theoretical Applications to Economics and Operations Research. Theory and Decision Library, vol 18. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2640-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2640-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4780-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2640-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics