Advertisement

Using Partial Least Squares and LISREL to Research International Strategies

  • Johan Roos
  • George S. Yip
  • Johny K. Johansson
Chapter

Abstract

Four studies are described to illustrate the usage of latent variable structural equations modeling in research on internationalization strategies. The first two studies address the relationship between globalization strategies and structure, and the role of national differences. The third and fourth studies describe factors affecting the performance of international strategic alliances. The literature and theoretical reviews are purposely kept brief, as the paper focuses on methodological issues, with the emphasis on how to apply structural equations modeling techniques. The paper specifically compares PLS and LISREL, the two most common structural equations modeling techniques used in empirical testing.

Keywords

Partial Little Square Knowledge Transfer Latent Construct Global Strategy Manifest Variable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.C., and D.W. Gerbing (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), pp. 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badaracco, Joseph L. (1991), The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R.P., and C. Fomell (1982), “Theoretical Concepts, Measurement, and Meaning”, in Fomell, C., (ed.), A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, Vol. II, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 24–38.Google Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R.P., and L.W. Phillips (1982), “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construct”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, pp. 459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, Peter M., and D. G. Bonett (1980), “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures,” Psychological Bulletin, 88, pp 586–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boomsma, A (1983), On the Robustness of LISREL (Maximum Likelihood Estimation) Against Small Sample Size and Non-Normality, doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Chakravarthy, B., and Y. Doz (1992), “Strategy process research: focusing on corporate self-renewal,” Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, Vol. 13, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
  8. Dijkstra, T (1983), “Some Comments on Maximum Likelihood and Partial Least Squares Methods”, Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar
  9. Fomell, C (1982), “A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis: An Overview”, in Fomell, C., (ed.), A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, Vol. I, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  10. Fomell, C (1987), “A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis: Classifications of Methods and Implications for Marketing Research”, in Houston, M., (ed.), Review of Marketing 1987, American Marketing Association, University of Minnesota, pp. 407–450.Google Scholar
  11. Fomell, C., and F.L. Bookstein (1987), “Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XIX, pp. 440–452.Google Scholar
  12. Fomell, C., Lorange, P. and J. Roos (1990), “The Cooperative Venture Formation Process: A Latent Variable Structural Modeling Approach,” Management Science, Special Issue on State of the Art in Theory and Methodology in Strategy Research, Vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 1246–1255.Google Scholar
  13. Geisser, S (1974) “A Predictive Approach to the Random Effect Model”, Biometrica, Vol. 61, pp. 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamel, G (1991), Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances, SMJ, Vol. 12, pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
  15. Inkpen, A., and M. Crossan (1995), Believing is seeing: joint ventures and organizational learning, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 32, pp. 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansson, Johny K., and George S. Yip (1994) “Exploiting Globalization Potential: U.S. and Japanese Strategies,” Strategic Management Journal, October, pp. 579–601.Google Scholar
  17. Jöreskog, K.G., and H. Wold, (eds.), (1982), Systems under Indirect Observations, Part I and II, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  18. Jöreskog, K.G., and H. Wold (1982), “The ML and PLS Techniques for Modeling with Latent Variables: Historical and Comparative Aspects”, in Jöreskog, K.G., and H. Wold, (eds.), Systems under Indirect Observations, Part I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 263–270.Google Scholar
  19. Jöreskog, K.G., and D. Sörbom (1979), Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models, Abt Ass., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Luijben, T (1989), Statistical Guidance for Model Modification in Covariance Structure Analysis, Sociometric Research Foundation, Amsterdam, Holland.Google Scholar
  21. Lohmöller, J (1982), “An Overview of Latent Variables Path Analysis.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Lohmöller, J-B (1984), LVPLS: Program Manual, Version 1. 6, Zentralarchiv flir Empirische Sozialforschung, University of Köln.Google Scholar
  23. Lyles, M (1994), The impact of organizational learning on joint venture formation, International Business Review, Special Issue, Vol. 3., No. 4, pp. 459–468.Google Scholar
  24. Saris, W., and H. Stronkhorst (1984), Causal Modeling in Non-experimental Research, Sociometric Research Foundation, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  25. Stone, M (1974), “Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 36, pp. 111–147.Google Scholar
  26. Tukey, J.W (1958), “Bias and Confidence in Not-Quite Large Samples”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29: 614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wathne, K., Roos, J., and G. von Krogh (1996), “Towards a theory of knowledge transfer in cooperative strategies,” in von Krogh, G., and J. Roos (Eds.), Managing Knowledge: Perspectives on Cooperation and Competition, SAGE Publications, London.Google Scholar
  28. Wold, H., “Introduction”, in Wold, H (1990), (ed.), Theoretical Empiricism,Paragon House, New York, NY, pp. vii-XL.Google Scholar
  29. Wold, H (1982), “Soft Modeling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions”, in Jöreskog, K.G., and H. Wold, (eds.), Systems under Indirect Observations, Part II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
  30. Yip, George S., Johny K. Johansson, and Johan Roos (1996), “Effects of Nationality on Global Strategy,” Marketing Science Institute report.Google Scholar
  31. Yip, George S (1996), “A ‘Borderless’ World - Issues and Evidence,” in W. F. Shepherd and Yan Islam, eds., Current Issues in International Business, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Roos
    • 1
  • George S. Yip
    • 2
  • Johny K. Johansson
    • 3
  1. 1.International Institute for Management DevelopmentSwitzerland
  2. 2.Anderson Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaUSA
  3. 3.School of Business Administration Georgetown UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations