Probability pp 308-378 | Cite as

# Convergence of Probability Measures. Central Limit Theorem

## Abstract

Many of the fundamental results in probability theory are formulated as *limit theorems*. Bernoulli’s law of large numbers was formulated as a limit theorem; so was the De Moivre-Laplace theorem, which can fairly be called the origin of a genuine theory of probability and, in particular, which led the way to numerous investigations that clarified the conditions for the validity of the central limit theorem. Poisson’s theorem on the approximation of the binomial distribution by the “Poisson” distribution in the case of rare events was formulated as a limit theorem. After the example of these propositions, and of results on the rapidity of convergence in the De Moivre-Laplace and Poisson theorems, it became clear that in probability it is necessary to deal with various kinds of convergence of distributions, and to establish the rapidity of convergence connected with the introduction of various “natural” measures of the distance between distributions. In the present chapter we shall discuss some general features of the convergence of probability distributions and of the distance between them. In this section we take up questions in the general theory of weak convergence of probability measures in metric spaces. The De Moivre-Laplace theorem, the progenitor of the central limit theorem, finds a natural place in this theory. From §3, it is clear that the method of characteristic functions is one of the most powerful means for proving limit theorems on the weak convergence of probability distributions in *R* ^{ n }. In §6, we consider questions of metrizability of weak convergence. Then, in §8, we turn our attention to a different kind of convergence of distributions (stronger than weak convergence), namely convergence in variation. Proofs of the simplest results on the rapidity of convergence in the central limit theorem and Poisson’s theorem will be given in §§10 and 11.

## Keywords

Probability Measure Characteristic Function Central Limit Theorem Weak Convergence Independent Random Variable## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [G5]B. V. Gnedenko and A. N. Kolmogorov.
*Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables*, revised edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1968.Google Scholar - [P4]Yu. V. Prohorov. Convergence of random processes and limit theorems in probability theory.
*Theory Probab. Appl*.**1**(1956), 157–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [B3]P. Billingsley.
*Convergence of Probability Measures*. Wiley, New York, 1968.MATHGoogle Scholar - [P6]V. V. Petrov.
*Limit Theorems for Sums of Independent Random Variables [Predel’nye teoremy dlya summ nezavisimyh sluchainyh velichin]*. Nauka, Moscow, 1987.Google Scholar - [Z4]V. M. Zolotarev.
*Modern theory of summation of random variables [Sovre-mennaya teoriya summirovaniya nezavisimyh sluchatnyh velichin]*. Nauka, Moscow, 1986.Google Scholar - [R5]V. I. Rotar. An extension of the Lindeberg—Feller theorem.
*Math. Notes***18**(1975), 660–663.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [A5]R. B. Ash.
*Real Analysis and Probability*. Academic Press, New York, 1972.Google Scholar - [P1]V. V. Petrov.
*Sums of Independent Random Variables*. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [D6]R. M. Dudley. Distances of probability measures and random variables.
*Ann. Math. Statist*.**39**(1968), 1563–1572.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - [P7]D. Pollard.
*Convergence of Stochastic Processes*. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [B4]A. A. Borovkov.
*Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie: eine Einf hrung*, first edition Birkhäuser, Basel—Stuttgart, 1976;*Theory of Probability*, second edition*[Teoriya veroyatnostel]*. “Nauka,” Moscow, 1986.Google Scholar - [J1]J. Jacod and A. N. Shiryaev.
*Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes*. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1987.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [L10]L. LeCam.
*Asymptotic Methods in Statistical Theory*. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.Google Scholar - [G7]P. E. Greenwood and A. N. Shiryaev.
*Contiguity and the Statistical Invariance Principle*. Gordon and Breach, New York, 1985.MATHGoogle Scholar - [L11]F. Liese and I. Vajda.
*Convex Statistical Distances*. Teubner, Leipzig, 1987.MATHGoogle Scholar - [P8]E. L. Presman. Approximation in variation of the distribution of a sum of independent Bernoulli variables with a Poisson
*law. Theory of Probability and Its Applications***30**(1985), no. 2, 417–422.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar