Advertisement

Optimal pH Control in Sequential Biochemical Reaction Systems via Generating a pH Gradient Across an Immobilized Enzyme Film

  • G. Chen
  • J. P. Byers
  • R. L. Fournier
  • S. Varanasi
Chapter

Abstract

Multistep synthesis reactions form the basis for the manufacture of a variety of important biochemicals. However, in many cases, the optimal operating pH is much different for each individual step of these reactions. Even so, conducting all or some of these reaction steps in the same reactor often may have technical (and/or economic) benefits, as when one of the intermediate steps has a very low product to reactant ratio at equilibrium. When it is required to perform these sequential reaction steps in the same vessel, the usual method is to use a compromise pH. However, this approach is neither satisfactory nor feasible always because the rates of most enzyme-catalyzed reactions decay exponentially as one drifts away from the enzyme’s optimal pH. Thus, a technique which permits one to conduct the individual steps at their respective optimal pH and, yet, in close proximity to one another is extremely desirable. We recently proposed such a technique: a method for conducting, in a single reactor, the sequential reaction A ⇔ B → C. The first step is an enzyme-catalyzed reaction that takes place in a basic environment and the second step is either an enzyme-catalyzed reaction or a fermentation that occurs in an acidic environment. The approach suggested was to coat the pellets, within which the enzyme catalyzing the A ⇔ B step was immobilized, with a very thin (< lµm) layer of urease, before suspending the pellets in an acidic bulk solution in which the step B → C takes place. Now, adding a small concentration of urea to the bulk solution allows one to sustain the necessary pH difference between the bulk solution and the interior of the pellets, thereby enabling the two steps to take place in close proximity and also at their respective optimal pH.

Keywords

Reaction Step Bulk Solution Xylose Isomerase Glucose Isomerase Jack Bean Urease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Byers, J.P., Shah, M.B., Fournier, R.L., and S. Varanasi, 1993. “Generation of a pH Gradient in an Immobilized Enzyme System.”, Biotechnol Bioeng, 42: 410–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Byers, J.P., Fournier, R.L., and S. Varanasi, 1992. “A Feasibility Analysis of a Novel Approach for the Conversion of Xylose to Ethanol.”, Chem Eng Comm, 112: 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fournier, R. L., S. Varanasi, and J.P. Byers, US patents: # 5,254,468 (1993) and # 5,397,700 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruinenberg, P.M., de Bot, P.H.M., van Dijken, J.P., and W.A. Scheffers, 1984. “NADH-linked aldose reductase: the key to anaerobic fermentation of xylose by yeasts.”, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 19: 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiang, L.C., Gong, C.S., Chen, L.F. and G.T. Tsao, 1981. “D-Xylulose Fermentation to Ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae”, Appl Environ Microbiol, 42: 284–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gong, C.S., Chen, L.F., Flickinger, M.C., Chiang, L.C., and G.T. Tsao, 1981. “Production of Ethanol from D-Xylose by Using D-Xylose Isomerase and Yeasts.”, Appl Environ Microbiol, 41: 430–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hahn-Hägerdäl, B., Berner, S., and K. Skoog, 1986. “Improved ethanol production from xylose with glucose isomerase and Sacchromyces cerevisiae using the respiratory inhibitor azide.”, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 24: 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsiao, H-Y, Chiang, L-C, Chen L-F, and Tsao, G. T., 1982. Enzyme Microb Technol, 4: p. 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lastick, S.M., Tucker, M.Y., Beyette, J.R., Noll, G.R., and K. Grohmann, 1989. “Simultaneous fermentation and isomerization of xylose.”, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 30: 574–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olivier, S.P., and P.J. du Toit, 1984. “Sugar Cane Bagasse as a Possible Source of Fermentable Carbohydrates. II. Optimization of the Xylose Isomerase for the Isomerization of Xylose to Xylulose in Laboratory-Scale Units.”, Biotechnol Bioeng, 18: 684–699.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skoog, K. and B. Hahn-Hagerdal, 1988. “Xylose Fermentation.”, Enzyme Microb Technol, 10: 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tewari, Y.B., Steckler, D.K., and R.N. Goldberg, 1985. “Thermodynamics of the conversion of aqueous xylose to xylulose.”, Biophys Chem, 22: 181–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toivola, A., Yarrow D., van den Bosch, E., van Dijken, J.P., and W.A. Scheffers, 1984. “Alcoholic Fermentation of D-Xylose by Yeasts.”, Appl Environ Microbiol, 47: 1221–1223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson, W.A., Moo-Young, M., and R.L. Legge, 1992. “Development of a Multienzyme Reactor for Dopamine Synthesis: I. Enzymology and Kinetics.”, Biotechnol Bioeng, 39: 781–789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson, W.A., Moo-Young, M., and R.L. Legge, 1992. “Development of a Multienzyme Reactor for Dopamine Sythesis: II. Reactor Enginneering and Simulation.”, Biotechnol Bioeng, 40: 388–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Savidge, T.A., 1984. “Enzymatic Conversion used in the Production of Penicillin and Cephlosporin.”, In: Chapt. 5, E.J. Vandamme (ed.), Biotechnology of Industrial Antibiotics, Marcel Dekker, Inc., USA.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ro, H.S., and H.S. Kim, 1991. “Continuous production of gluconic acid and sorbitol from sucrose using invertase and an oxidoreductase of Zymomonas mobilis.”, Enzyme Microb Technol, 13: 920–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanson, R.L., Bembenek, K.S., Patel, R.N., and L.J. Szarka, 1992. “Transformation of Nε-CBZ-L-lysine to CBZ-L-oxylysine L-amino acid oxidase from Providencia alcalifaciens and L-2-hydroxy-isocaproate dehydrogenase from Lacrobacillus confusus.”, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 37: 599–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dixon, N.E., Riddles, P.W., Gazzola, C., Blakeley, R.L., and B. Zerner, 1980. “Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). V. On the mechanism of action of urease on urea, formamide, acetamide, N-methylurea, and related compounds.”, Can J Biochem, 58: 1335–1344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruckenstein, E. and S. Varanasi, 1984. “Acid Generating Immobilized Enzymic Reactions in Porous Media — Activity Control via Augmentation of Proton Diffusion by Weak Acids.”, Chem Eng Science, 39: 1185–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Chen
    • 1
  • J. P. Byers
    • 1
  • R. L. Fournier
    • 1
  • S. Varanasi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of ToledoToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations