Problem Solving at the Macrolevel

  • John G. Bruhn
  • Howard M. Rebach
Part of the Clinical Sociology book series (CSRP)


The distinctions between macro- and microsociology have been debated for sometime (Eisenstadt and Halle, 1985; Knorr-Cetina and Cicourel, 1981). As Huber (1991) pointed out there is controversy among sociologists about the meaning of the words micro and macro. There is a tendency to equate micro with individual and macro with collective level events. Whether one focuses one’s efforts at the individual or personal level or at a broader social systems level, both are linked. The nature of macro-micro linkages is increasingly important as the etiologies, prevention, and solutions to contemporary societal problems, in the United States and elsewhere, lie in understanding the interfaces and linkages between individual behavior and factors at the societal level. While the emphasis in this chapter will be on problem solving at the macrolevel, it is our premise that problem solving cannot be effective if it is based on what it includes or excludes. Rather problem solving should be interactive between levels of human behavior, and this requires an interdisciplinary perspective (Sanderson, 1988).


Community Group White Adult Anger Control Superordinate Goal Minority Adult 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Black, J.S. (1987). The technological solution: Hard and soft paths, scientific uncertainty, and the control of technology. In M. R. Greenberg (Ed.), Public health and the environment: The United States experience (pp. 207–229). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, L.D. (Ed.). (1991). Health policy and the disadvantaged. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bruhn, J.G. (1987). The clinical sociologist as a health broker. Clinical Sociology Review, 5,168–179.Google Scholar
  4. Bruhn, J.G. (1990). A community model for AIDS prevention. Family and Community Health, 13,65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christiani, D.C. (1993). Urban and transboundary air pollution: Human health consequences. In E. Chivian, M. McCally, H. Hu, & A. Haines (Eds.), Critical condition: Human health and the environment (pp. 13–30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cortese, A.D. (1993). Introduction: Human health, risk, and the environment. In E. Chivian, M. McCally, H. Hu, & A. Harris (Eds.), Critical condition: Human health and the environment (pp. 1–11). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, K. (March, 1995). Minority Americans do not have equal health opportunities: A briefing note from the Commonwealth Fund. New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenstadt, S.N., & Halle, H.J. (Eds.). (1985). Macro-sociological theory: Perspectives on sociology theory (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, C.A., & Schwartz, C. (Eds.) (1996). Encyclopedia of Associations, Vol. 1: National Organizations of the U.S. (30th ed.). New York: Gale.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, R.H. (1990). Health and the global environment. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Huber, J. (Ed.) (1991). Macro-micro linkages in sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, J.A., & Lawrence, J.S. (1988). The AIDS health crisis: Psychological and social interventions. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knorr-Cetina K., & Cicourel, A.V. (Eds). (1981). Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Laue, J. (1989). Sociology as advocacy: There are no neutrals. Sociological Practice, 7, 110–122.Google Scholar
  15. Leinberger, P., & Tucker, B. (1991). The new individualists. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  16. Leichter, H.M. (1991). Free to be foolish. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lichtenstein, K., & Helfand, J. (1993). Radiation and health: Nuclear weapons and nuclear power. In E. Chivian, M. McCally, H. Hu, & A. Haines (Eds.), Critical condition: Human health and the environment (pp. 93–121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lyons, G.M., & Mastanduno, M. (1993). International intervention, state sovereignty and the future of international society. International Social Sciences Journal, 45, 517–532.Google Scholar
  19. McMurtry, S.L., Kettner, P.M., & Netting, F.E. (1993). Strategic choices made by nonprofit agencies serving low-paying clients. Community organization and social administration: Advances, trends and emerging principles. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Netting, F.E., Kettner, P.M., & McMurtry, S.L. (1993). Social work macro practice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  22. Page, G.W. (1987). Water and health. In M. R. Greenberg (Ed.). Public health and the environment: The United States experience (pp. 105–138). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Porritt, J. (1995, October 7). Outdoors: The National Trust: A pussy-cat that could turn tiger. Daily Telegraph, p. 3.Google Scholar
  24. Rauch, J. (1994, June 6). The hyperpluralism trap: What “We the people” has wrought. New Republic, 210 (23), p. 22.Google Scholar
  25. Redclift, M., & Benton, T. (Eds.). (1994). Social theory and the global environment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Rivlin, A. (1971). Systematic thinking for social action. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  27. Roberts, A.R. (1994). Crime in America. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Critical issues in crime and justice (pp. 3–18) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Sanderson, S.K. (1988). Macrosociology: An introduction to human societies. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  29. Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R., & Sherif, C.W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: Institute of Group Relations, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  30. Sherman, W.R., & Wenocur, S. (1983). Empowering public welfare workers through mutual support. Social Work, 28, 375–379.Google Scholar
  31. Shostak, A.B. (1985). How can we all survive? Managing social change. In R. A. Straus (Ed.), Using sociology (pp. 172–182). Bayside, NY: General Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Simon, H.A. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Skolnick, J.H., & Currie, E. (Eds.). (1985). Crisis in American institutions (6th ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  34. Steiner, G.A., & Schollhammer, H. (April, 1975). Pitfalls in multi-national long-range planning. Long Range Planning, pp. 2–12.Google Scholar
  35. Straus, D.B. (1987). Collaborating to win. In M. R. Greenberg (Ed.), Public health and the environment (pp. 271–292). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Recommended Readings

  1. Aday, L.A. (1993). At risk in America: The health and health care needs of vulnerable populations in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Amick, B.C., Levine, S., Tarlov, A.R., & Walsh, D.C. (Eds.). (1995). Society and health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fuchs, V.R. (1993). The future of health policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. McKinley, J.B. (Ed.). (1981). Issues in health care policy. Milbank Reader 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Patrick, D.L., & Erickson, P. (1993). Health status and health policy: Quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Sills, Y.G. (1994). The AIDS pandemic: Social perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • John G. Bruhn
    • 1
  • Howard M. Rebach
    • 2
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State University / HarrisburgMiddletownUSA
  2. 2.University of Maryland, Eastern ShorePrincess AnneUSA

Personalised recommendations