Many scientists and engineers mistakenly believe that scientific writing must be dull. Unfortunately, their writing reflects that misconception. It is dull, needlessly dull. Many scientists and engineers undercut the purpose of scientific writing—to inform—with sentences and paragraphs that drag and with discontinuities in language that trip readers. Scientists and engineers study the most fascinating subjects in the world: solar systems, animal and plant kingdoms, the inner workings of atoms and nuclei. Why then do so many scientists and engineers resign themselves to prose styles that are sluggish, that are without life?
KeywordsSentence Length Prepositional Phrase Scientific Writing Sentence Opener Volcanic Explosion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Eichelberger, J. C, “Modeling Mount St. Helens Volcanic Eruption,” Sandia Technology, vol. 7, no. 2 (June 1983), p. 3.Google Scholar
- Margolis, S. B., and R. C. Armstrong, “Two Asymptotic Models for Solid Propellant Combustion,” Sandia Combustion Research Program Annual Report (Livermore, CA: Sandia National Laboratories, 1985), chap. 5, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
- Saarinen, T. F., and J. L. Sell, Warning and Response to the Mount St. Helens Eruption (Albany: State University of New York, 1987).Google Scholar