Advertisement

Linear Equalization

  • Jan W. M. Bergmans
Chapter

Abstract

Baseband data transmission is often hampered by linear intersymbol interference (ISI) and noise (see Chapters 2 and 3). In the present chapter we deal with the oldest technique to counter these two disturbances, namely linear equalization. The linear equalizer (LE) is just a linear filter that suppresses ISI at the periodic instants at which decisions are taken. The name of the technique originates from the fact that the filter must essentially equalize the transfer characteristics of the channel across a band that ranges from DC up to about the Nyquist frequency. A roll-off beyond this band serves to suppress out-of-band noise. The LE can be analog, digital or a mixture of the two. The digital portion of the LE is called T-spaced when the sampling rate coincides with the symbol rate 1/T, and fractionally-spaced when it is oversampled with respect to symbol rate. If the channel characteristics are a priori known then the LE can be a fixed filter. More often than not, however, channel characteristics are uncertain and the LE is adaptive. In the present chapter we are mainly concerned with the desired transfer characteristics of the LE, and to a lesser extent with the problem of achieving or approximating these desired characteristics with a practical equalizer implementation. That problem is inherent in adaptive equalization as discussed in Chapter 8.

Keywords

Impulse Response Matched Filter Linear Equalization Linear Equal Noise Enhancement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M.R. Aaron and D.W. Tufts, ‘Intersymbol Interference and Error Probability’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT-12, No. 1, pp. 26–34, Jan. 1966.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A.N. D’Andrea, F. Guglielmi, U. Mengali and A. Spalvieri, ‘Design of Transmit and Receive Digital Filters for Data Communications’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 42, No. 2/3/4, pp. 357–359, Feb./March/Apr. 1994.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    H. Baher and J. Beneat, ‘Design of Analog and Digital Data Transmission Filters’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 449–460, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    W.R. Bennett and J.R. Davey, Data Transmission. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.W.M. Bergmans and A.J.E.M. Janssen, ‘Robust Data Equalization, Fractional Tap Spacing and the Zak Transform’, Philips J. Res., Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 351–398, 1987.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J.W.M. Bergmans, ‘SNR Merits of Binary Modulation Codes in Equalized Digital Recording Systems’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. SAC-10, No. 1, pp. 157–167, Jan. 1992.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    P.R. Chevillat and G. Ungerboeck, ‘Optimum FIR Transmitter and Receiver Filters for Data Transmission over Band-Limited Channels’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-30, No. 8, pp. 1909–1915, Aug. 1982.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.M. Cioffi, G.P. Dudevoir, M.V. Eyuboglu, and G.D. Forney, Jr., ‘MMSE Decision-Feedback Equalizers and Coding–Part I: Equalization Results’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 2582–2594, Oct. 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Duel-Hallen, ‘Equalizers for Multiple Input/Multiple Output Channels and PAM Systems with Cyclostationary Input Sequences’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. SAC-10, No. 3, pp. 630–639, Apr. 1992.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    W. van Etten, ‘An Optimum Linear Receiver for Multiple Channel Digital Transmission Systems’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-23, No. 8, pp. 828–834, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R.A. Gibby and J.W. Smith, ‘Some Extensions of Nyquist’s Telegraph Transmission Theory’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 44, pp. 1487–1510, Sept. 1965.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R.D. Gitlin and S.B. Weinstein, ‘Fractionally-Spaced Equalization: An Improved Digital Transversal Equalizer’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 275–296, Feb. 1981.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    L. Guidoux, ‘Egalisateur Autoadaptif â Double Èchantillonage’, L’Onde Èlectronique, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 9–13, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M.L. Honig, P. Crespo and K. Steiglitz, ‘Suppression of Near-End and Far-End Crosstalk by Linear Pre-and Post-Filtering’ IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. SAC-10, No. 3, pp. 614–629, Apr. 1992.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    G.E. Jacoby, ‘Signal Equalization in Digital Magnetic Recording’, IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. MAG-4, No. 3, pp. 302–305, Sept. 1968.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Jess and H.W. Schüssler, ‘A Class of Pulse-Forming Networks’, IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory, Vol. CT-12, pp. 393–400, Sept. 1965.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    A.R. Kaye and D.A. George, ‘Transmission of Multiplexed PAM Signals Over Multiple Channel and Diversity Systems’, IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., Vol. COM-18, pp. 520526, Oct. 1970.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. Kavehrad, ‘Timing-Jitter-Suppressed Partial-Response Signals’, Electronic Circuits and Systems, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 201–207, Sept. 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    K. Küpfmüller, ‘Transient Phenomena in Wave Filters’, Elek. Nachr.-Techn., Vol. 1, p. 141, 1924.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    E.A. Lee and D.G. Messerschmitt, Digital Communication. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    R.W. Lucky, J. Salz and E.J. Weldon, Jr., Principles of Data Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    S.E. Nader and L.F. Lind, ‘Optimal Data Transmission Filters’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., Vol. CAS-26, pp. 36–45, Jan. 1979.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    H. Nyquist, ‘Certain Factors Affecting Telegraph Speed’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 324–346, 1924.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Nyquist, ‘Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory’, Trans. AIEE (Commun. and Electronics), Vol. 47, pp. 617–644, 1928.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    P.K.D. Pai, A.A. Abidi and R.A. Gomez, ‘A Simple Continuous-Time Equalizer for Use in Magnetic Storage Read Channels’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. SAC-10, No. 1, pp. 289–299, 1992.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    J.G. Proakis, Digital Communications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983 (2nd ed. 1989 ).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    S.U.H. Qureshi, ‘daptive Equalization’, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 73, No. 9, pp. 1349–1387, Sept. 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    J. Salz, ‘igital Transmission over Cross-Coupled Linear Channels’, ATandT Technical Journal, Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 1147–1159, July-Aug. 1985.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    D. Shnidman, ‘ Generalized Nyquist Criterion and an Optimum Linear Receiver for a Pulse Modulation System’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 46, pp. 2163–2177, Nov. 1967.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    D.A. Spauling, ‘ynthesis of Pulse-Shaping Networks in the Time Domain’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 48, pp. 2425–2444, Sept. 1969.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Y.P. Tsividis and J.O. Voorman (Eds.), Integrated Continuous-Time Filters. New York: IEEE Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    D.W. Tufts, ‘yquist’s Problem–The Joint Optimization of Transmitter and Receiver in Pulse Amplitude Modulation’, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 53, pp. 248–259, March 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    D.W. Tufts and T. Berger, ‘ptimum Pulse Amplitude Modulation–Part I: Transmitter-Receiver Design and Bounds from Information Theory’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT-13, No. 2, pp. 196–208, Apr. 1967.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    D.W. Tufts and T. Berger, ‘ptimum Pulse Amplitude Modulation–Part II: Inclusion of Timing Jitter’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT-13, No. 2, pp. 209–216, Apr. 1967.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    G. Ungerboeck, ‘Fractional Tap-Spacing Equalizer and Consequences for Clock Recovery in Data Modems’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-24, No. 8, pp 856–864, Aug. 1976.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    P. Vandamme, ‘On the Synthesis of Digital Transmit Filters’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-39, No. 4, pp. 485–487, Apr. 1991.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    R.W. Wood, ‘New Detector for 1,k Codes Equalized to Class II Partial Response’, Proc. INTERMAG’89, March 28–31, 1989, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan W. M. Bergmans
    • 1
  1. 1.Philips ResearchEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations