Abstract
An observational study is biased if the treated and control groups differ prior to treatment in ways that matter for the outcomes under study. An overt bias is one that can be seen in the data at hand for instance, prior to treatment, treated subjects are observed to have lower incomes than controls. A hidden bias is similar but cannot be seen because the required information was not observed or recorded. Overt biases are controlled using adjustments, such as matching or stratification. In other words, treated and control subjects may be seen to differ in terms of certain observed covariates, but these visible differences may be removed by comparing treated and control subjects with the same values of the observed covariates, that is, subjects in the same matched set or stratum defined by the observed covariates. It is natural to ask when the standard methods for randomized experiments may be applied to matched or stratified data from an observational study. This chapter discusses a model for an observational study in which there is overt bias but no hidden bias. The model is, at best, one of many plausible models, but it does clarify when methods for randomized experiments may be used in observational studies, and so it becomes the starting point for thinking about hidden biases. Dealing with hidden bias is the focus of Chapters 4 through 8.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bishop, Y., Fienberg, S., and Holland, P. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Breslow, N. and Day, N. (1980). The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Volume 1 of Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization.
Canner, P. (1984). How much data should be collected in a clinical trial? Statistics in Medicine, 3, 423–432.
Canner, P. (1991). Covariate adjustment of treatment effects in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 12, 359–366.
Cochran, W.G. (1957). The analysis of covariance. Biometrics, 13, 261–281.
Cochran, W.G. (1965). The planning of observational studies of human populations (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 128, 134–155.
Cochran, W.G. (1968). The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 24, 205–213.
Cochran, W.G. and Rubin, D.B. (1973). Controlling bias in observational studies: A review. Sankya, Series A, 35, 417–446.
Cole, P. (1979). The evolving case-control study. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 32, 15–27.
Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., and Kilgore, S. (1982). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools. Sociology of Education, 55, 65–76.
Cornfield, J. (1951). A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data: Applications to cancer of the lung, breast and cervix. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 11, 1269–1275.
Cox, D.R. (1970). The Analysis of Binary Data. London: Methuen.
Cox, D.R. (1958). The Planning of Experiments. New York: Wiley.
Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley.
Gastwirth, J. (1988). Statistical Reasoning in Law and Public Policy. New York: Academic Press.
Goldberger, A. and Cain, G. (1982). The causal analysis of cognitive outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore report. Sociology of Education, 55, 103–122.
Greenhouse, S. (1982). Cornfield’s contributions to epidemiology. Biometrics, 38S, 33–46.
Hamilton, M. (1979). Choosing a parameter for 2 x 2 table or 2 x 2 x 2 table analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 362–375.
Holland, P. and Rubin, D. (1988). Causal inference in retrospective studies. Evaluation Review, 12, 203–231.
Kitagawa, E. (1964). Standardized comparisons in population research. Demography, 1, 296–315.
Kleinbaum, D., Kupper, L., and Morgenstern, H. (1982). Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Mantel, N. (1973). Synthetic retrospective studies. Biometrics, 29, 479–486.
Mantel, N. and Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.
Morton, D., Saah, A., Silberg, S., Owens, W., Roberts, M., and Saah, M. (1982). Lead absorption in children of employees in a lead related industry. American Journal of Epidemiology, 115, 549–555.
Mosteller, F. and Tukey, J. (1977). Data Analysis and Regression. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Rosenbaum, P.R. (1984a). The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 147, 656–666.
Rosenbaum, P.R. (1984b). Conditional permutation tests and the propensity score in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 565–574.
Rosenbaum, P. (1986). Dropping out of high school in the United States: An observational study. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 207–224.
Rosenbaum, P.R. (1987a). Model-based direct adjustment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 387–394.
Rosenbaum, P.R. (1987b). The role of a second control group in an observational study (with Discussion). Statistical Science, 2, 292–316.
Rosenbaum, P.R. (1988). Permutation tests for matched pairs with adjustments for covariates. Applied Statistics, 37, 401–411.
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516–524.
Rubin, D.B. (1977). Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1–26.
Rubin, D.B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.
Ury, H. (1975). Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: Continuous or dichotomous data. Biometrics, 31, 643–649.
Walker, A. (1982). Efficient assessment of confounder effects in matched follow-up studies. Applied Statistics, 31, 293–297.
Walker, A., Jick, H., Hunter, J., Danford, A., Watkins, R., Alhadeff, L., and Rothman, K. (1981). Vasectomy and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Lancet, 13–15.
Whitehead, R., Rosenbaum, P., and Carbone, P. (1984). Cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, lomustine, and vincristine (PACCO) in the treatment of nonsmall cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Treatment Reports, 68, 771–773.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosenbaum, P.R. (1995). Overt Bias in Observational Studies. In: Observational Studies. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2443-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2443-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2445-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2443-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive