Advertisement

Modeling for Decision Support

  • Patricia Flatley Brennan
  • Gail R. Casper
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

Computerized decision-support systems link computer technology with decision-making algorithms to augment, extend, or replace the judgment of the nurse. Decision modeling is one approach to computerized decision support with significant implications for clinical nursing practice. Nurses use decision-modeling systems when further analysis, rather than additional data, is needed to solve a decision problem. Implemented primarily on microcomputers, these systems, which incorporate the probability of events occurring, descriptions of outcomes, and values associated with the predicted outcomes, use decision analytic or multiple criteria models as the structure for analyzing decision problems. More recently, decision modeling has been conceptualized as a means to incorporate patient views or preferences in the decision-making process.

Keywords

Decision Problem Decision Analysis Multiple Criterion Computerize Decision Support Expert Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowlby J: Attachment & Loss—Volume III: Loss. New York: Basic Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Brennan PF: The Effects of a Computerized Decision Aid on the Decision Making of Nurse Managers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. Corcoran S: Decision analysis: A step by step guide for making clinical decisions. Nursing and Health Care 1986; 7: 149–154.Google Scholar
  4. Data 2.6 [computer software]: Boston, MA: Tree Age Software Co., 1995.Google Scholar
  5. Expert Choice 9.0 [computer software]: Pittsburgh, PA: Expert Choice, Inc., 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Hollenberg J: Smltree [computer software]. New York: Author, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. Humphreys P, Phillips L: MAUD. [computer software]. London: Decision Analysis Unit, London School of Economics, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan RM: Health-related quality of life in patient decision making. Journal of Social Issues 1991; 47: 69–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kasper JF, Mulley AG, Wennberg JE: Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care. Quality Review Bulletin 1992; June: 183–190.Google Scholar
  10. Keeney R, Raiffa H: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Lightyear 1.5 [computer software]: Coconut Grove, FL: Thoughtware, Inc., 1987.Google Scholar
  12. Pauker SG: Decision Maker 7.04 [computer software]. Boston: Pratt Medical Group, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. Sonnenberg FA, Pauker SG: Decision Maker 6.0. In: Salamon R, Blum B, Jorgensen M, eds. MedInfo 86—Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Medical Informatics, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986; 1152.Google Scholar
  14. von Neumann J, Morganstern O: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947. von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W: Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  15. Weinstein M, Fineberg H: Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Flatley Brennan
  • Gail R. Casper

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations