Advertisement

How Do You Formulate a Testable Exciting Hypothesis?

  • Robyn Dawes

Abstract

The first reaction of many reviewers to a research proposal or a journal article is either excitement or boredom. If the proposal is boring, they may approve it, but they are unlikely to vote a high rating. In almost any science a necessary but not sufficient condition for something to be important—which in this context means being fundable, being reportable in good scientific journals, and perhaps having an impact on the field—is that it is exciting. Thus, my first advice about getting proposals funded is to talk to friends in the field about your research idea and evaluate their reactions. Your proposal should elicit excitement; if it does not, you should think more about your ideas.

Keywords

Criminal Record Grant Proposal Optimal Linear Model Poliomyelitis Vaccine Clinical Judge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carroll, J., Wiener, R. L., Coates, D., Galegher, J., & Alibrio, J. J. 1982. Evaluation, diagnosis, and prediction in parole decision making. Law and Society Review 35; 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dawes, R. M. 1971. A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist 26, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. 1974. Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 81, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. 1989. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243: 1668–1674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lichtenstein, S., & Feeney, G. J. 1968. The importance of the data-generating model in probability estimation. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 42, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Meier, P. 1972. The biggest public health experiment ever. 1954 field trial of the Salk poliomyelitis vaccine. In J. M. Tanur, F. Mosteller, W. H. Kruskal, R. F. Link, R. S. Pieters, & G. R. Rising (eds.), Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown. San Francisco: Holden-Day, pp. 2–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robyn Dawes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations