Advertisement

Mitochondrial DNA Variation in Anastrepha fraterculus

  • G. J. Steck
  • W. S. Sheppard

Abstract

Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) is one of the most important fruit pests in Latin America. As currently defined, it is one of the most widely distributed (Mexico, Central and South America) and polyphagous species of the genus. It also presents one of the most difficult taxonomic problems due to morphological variability. In his revision of the genus, Stone (1942) stated that “in this part of the genus there is the greatest difficulty in determining specific limits”.

Keywords

Isoamyl Alcohol Isozyme Analysis Cesium Chloride Polyphagous Species Bethesda Research Laboratory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avise, J.C., Arnold, J., Ball, R.M., Bermingham, E., Lamb, T., Neigel, J.E., Reeb, C.A. and Saunders, N.C. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 489–522.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, A.C., Stone, W. E., Plummer, C.C. and McPhail, M.A. 1944. A review of studies on the Mexican fruit fly and related Mexican species. U.S. Dept. Agric. Misc. Publ. 531: 1155.Google Scholar
  3. Bush, G.L. 1962. The cytotaxonomy of the larvae of some Mexican fruit flies in the genus Anastrepha ( Tephritidae, Diptera). Psyche 69: 87–101.Google Scholar
  4. Desalle, R.L., Giddings, V. and Templeton, A. 1986. Mitochondrial DNA variability in natural populations of Hawaiian Drosophila. I. Methods and levels of variability in D. silvestris and D. geteroneura populations. Heredity 56: 75–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F. and Sambrook, J. 1982. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. 14 G.J. Steck and W.S. SheppardGoogle Scholar
  6. Morgante, J.S., Malavasi, A. and Bush, G. 1980. Biochemical systematics and evolutionary relationships of neotropical Anastrepha. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73: 622–630.Google Scholar
  7. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283–292.Google Scholar
  8. Rigby, P.W., Dieckman, M., Rhodes, C. and Berg, P. 1977. Labelling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J. Mol. Biol. 113–237.Google Scholar
  9. Rogers, J.S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance Studies in Genetics, Univ.E Texas Publ. 7213: 145–153.Google Scholar
  10. Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. Solferini, V.N. and Morgante, J.S. 1987. Karyotype study of eight species of Anastrepha ( Diptera: Tephritidae) Caryologia 43: 229–241.Google Scholar
  11. Stone, A. 1942. The fruitflies of the genus Anastrepha. U.S. Dep. Agric. Misc. Publ. 439: 1–112. Sheppard, W.S. and McPheron, M.A. In: Diversity in Apis (ed. D.R. Smith) Westview Press, Colorado. In press.Google Scholar
  12. Steck, G.J. 1991. Biochemical systematics and population genetic structure of Anastrepha fraterculus and related species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 84: (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Steck
  • W. S. Sheppard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations