Gender, Formal Authority, and Leadership

  • Cathryn Johnson
Chapter

Abstract

Do women and men in official leadership positions act similarly toward their subordinates? The majority of research in the area of gender, leadership, and formal authority addresses this question. One might think it would be easy to answer, but such is not the case. Available empirical evidence provides only contradictory answers. For example, a number of studies show no gender differences in leadership behavior, measured by subordinates’ perceptions of their leaders’ behavior or by observing actual leader behavior (Adams, 1978; Bartol, 1973; Bartol & Martin, 1986; Birdsall, 1980; Camden & Witt, 1983; Day & Stogdill, 1972; Dobbins & Platz, 1986; Donnell & Hall, 1980; Instone, Major, & Bunker, 1983; Koberg, 1985; Osborn & Vicars, 1976; Rice, Instone, & Adams, 1984; Terborg, 1979).1 Other studies, however, find evidence for gender stereotypic behavior where women leaders are more person oriented (considerate, appreciative, supportive) than men leaders (Gupta, Jenkins, & Beehr, 1983; Statham, 1988) who are more task oriented (directive, instructive, and commanding) (Baird & Bradley, 1979; Eskilson & Wiley, 1976; Fowler & Rosenfeld, 1979). In contrast, yet other studies find men leaders to be more person oriented than women leaders (Winther & Green, 1987), and women leaders to be more task oriented than men leaders (Bartol & Wortman, 1979; Helmich, 1974). Finally, Eagly and Johnson (1990), in a meta-analysis of leadership behavior, conclude that women leaders are slightly more person oriented and less task oriented than men leaders.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, E.F. (1978). A multivariate study of subordinate perceptions of and attitudes toward minority and majority managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 227–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, L.R., & Blanchard, P.N. (1982). Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird, J.E. Jr., & Bradley, P.H. (1979). Styles of management and communication: A comparative study of men and women. Communication Monographs, 46, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bales, R.F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Bales, R.F. (1972). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Bartol, K.M. (1973). Male and female leaders in small groups. East Lansing: MSU Business Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Bartol, K.M., & Martin, D.C. (1986). Women and men in task groups. In R. Ashmore & F. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations (pp. 259–310 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bartol, K.M., & Wortman, M.S. Jr. (1979). Sex of leader and subordinate role stress: A field study. Sex Roles, 5, 513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, J., Conner, T.L. & Fisek, M.H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  10. Berger, J., Fisek, M.H., Norman, R.Z., & Wagner, D.G. (1985). The formation of reward expectations in status situations. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 215–261 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Berger, J., Fisek, M.H., Norman, R.Z., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Bernard, J. (1975). The sex game. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  13. Birdsall, P. (1980). A comparative analysis of male and female managerial communication style in two organizations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blalock, H.M., Jr. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Blau, P.M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, S.M. (1979). Male versus female leaders: a comparison of empirical studies. Sex Roles, 5, 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Camden, C., & Witt, J. (1983). Manager communicative style and productivity: a study of female and male managers. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 6, 258–269.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, C.L., & Davidson, M.J. (1984). Women in management. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Day, D.R., and Stogdill, R.M. (1972). Leader behavior of male and female supervisors: a comparative study. Personnel Psychology 25: 353–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dobbins, Gregory H. & Stephanie J. Platz. (1986). Sex differences in leadership: how real are they? Academy of Management Review, 11, 118–127.Google Scholar
  21. Donnell, S.M., & Hall, J. (1980). Men and women as managers: a significant case of no significant difference. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Eagly, A.H., & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., & Klonsky, B.G. (in press). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin.Google Scholar
  25. Eskilson, A., & Wiley, M.G. (1976). Sex composition and leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 39, 183–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fennell, M.L., Barchas, P.R., Cohen, E.G., McMahon, A.M., & Hildebrand, P. (1978). An alternative perspective on sex differences in organizational settings: the process of legitimation. Sex Roles, 4, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Festinger, L.A. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fowler, G.D., & Rosenfeld, L.B. (1979). Sex differences and democratic leadership behavior. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 45, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gupta, N., Jenkins, D., Jr., & Beehr, T. (1983). Employee gender, gender similarity, and supervisor-subordinate cross-evaluations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 174–184.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, J.A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Helmich, D.L. (1974). Male and female presidents: some implications of leadership style. Human Resource Management, 12, 25–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Instone, D., Major, B. & Bunker, B.B. (1983). Gender, self confidence, and social influence strategies: an organizational simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Izraeli, D.N. (1983). Sex effects or structural effects? An empirical test of Kanter’s theory of proportions. Social Forces, 62, 153–165.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, C. (1991). Gender, formal authority and the interaction between leaders and subordinates. Dissertation Abstracts International, forthcoming in Vol. 51–12A.Google Scholar
  35. Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  36. Koberg, C.S. (1985). Sex and situational influences on the use of power: a follow-up study. Sex Roles, 13, 625–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction: conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lockheed, M.E., & Hall, K.P. (1976). Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic: applications to leadership training strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin, P.Y. (1985). Group sex composition in work organizations: a structural-normative model. In S. Bacharach & R. Mitchell, (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 5, pp. 311–349 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  40. Moore, S.F., Shaffer, L., Goodsell, D.A., & Baringoldz, G. (1983). Gender or situationally determined spoken language differences? The case of the leadership situation. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 6, 44–53.Google Scholar
  41. Osborn, R.N., & Vicars, W.M. (1976). Sex stereotypes: an artifact in leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction analysis? Academy of Management Journal, 19, 439–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay ( 3rd ed. ). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  43. Peters, T.J., & Waterman, R.H., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  44. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic interaction: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 1–52 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  45. Piliavin, J.A., & Martin, R.R. (1978). The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction. Sex Roles, 4, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rice, R.W., Instone, D., & Adams, J. (1984). Leader sex, leader success, and leadership process: two field studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 12–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ridgeway, C.L. (1988). Gender differences in task groups: a status and legitimacy account. In M. Webster, Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization (pp. 188–206 ). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Riger, S., & Galligan, P. (1980). Women in management: an exploration of competing paradigms. American Psychologist, 35, 902–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneier, C.E., & Bartol, K.M. (1980). Sex effects in emergent leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. South, S.J., Bonjean, C.M., Markham, W.T., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: men and women of the federal bureacracy. American Sociological Review, 47, 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Statham, A. (1988). Woman working for women: The manager and her secretary. In A. Statham, E. Miller, & H. Mauksch (Eds.), The worth of women’s work (pp. 225–243 ). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  54. Stodgill, R.M., Goode, O.S., & Day, D.R. (1963). The leader behavior of United States senators. Journal of Psychology, 56, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strodtbeck, F.L., & Mann, R.D. (1956). Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Terborg, J.R. (1979). Women in management: a research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 647–664.Google Scholar
  57. West, C. (1984). When the doctor is a “lady”: power, status and gender in physician-patient encounters. Symbolic Interaction, 7, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wexley, K.N., & Hunt, P.J. (1974). Male and female leaders: comparison of performance and behavior patterns. Psychological Reports, 35, 867–872.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Winther, D.A., & Green, S.B. (1987). Another look at gender-related differences in leadership behavior. Sex Roles, 16, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wood, U., & Karten, S.J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zimmerman, D.H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–129 ). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathryn Johnson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations