Advertisement

Extremal Trajectories, Small-time Reachable Sets and Local Feedback Synthesis: a Synopsis of the Three-dimensional Case

  • Heinz Schättler
Part of the Progress in Systems and Control Theory book series (PSCT, volume 9)

Abstract

In any optimization problem three basic questions have to be answered. Does an optimal solution exist? How can one restrict the candidates for optimality by way of necessary conditions? Is a candidate found in this way indeed optimal (in a local and/or global sense)? For problems on function spaces by now fairly general existence results are known see, for instance, Cesari [6]) which cover a wide range of realistic problem situations. The theories of necessary and sufficient conditions for optimality, on the other hand, lack a similar completeness of results. For optimal control problems, the Pontryagin Maximum Principle [11] gives first order necessary conditions for optimality. Several higher order conditions for optimality are known as well (cf. Krener [8], Knobloch [7] and the many references therein), but they mainly deal with special situations, like the generalized Legendre-Clebsch condition for singular arcs. Typically the necessary conditions will not suffice to single out the optimal control. In fact, in many cases there exists a significant gap between the structure of extremals (i.e. trajectories which satisfy the necessary conditions for optimality) and the structure of optimal trajectories in a regular synthesis. Roughly speaking, a regular synthesis consists of a family of extremals with the property that a unique extremal trajectory starts from every point of the state-space and which satisfies certain technical conditions which allow to prove that the corresponding feedback control is indeed optimal.

Keywords

Optimal Control Problem Optimal Trajectory Reference Trajectory Conjugate Point Pontryagin Maximum Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. A. Agrachev, R V Gamkrelidze, Symplectic Geometry for Optimal Control,in: Nonlinear Controllability and Optimal Control,H. Sussmann (Ed.), Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  2. [2].
    V. G. Boltyansky, Sufficient conditions for optimality and the justification of the dynamic programming method, SIAM J. Control 4 (1966), 326–361.Google Scholar
  3. [3].
    A. Bressan, The generic local time-optimal stabilizing controls in dimension 3, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 24 (1986), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4].
    P. Brunovsky, Every normal linear system has a regular time-optimal synthesis, Math. Slovaca 28 (1978), 81–100.Google Scholar
  5. [5].
    P. Brunovsky, Existence of regular synthesis for general control problems, J. Differential Equations 38 (1980), 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6].
    Cesari, “Optimization: Theory and Applications,” Springer Verlag, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. [7].
    H. W. Knobloch, Higher Order necessary conditions in optimal control theory, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 34 (1981), Springer Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8].
    A. Krener, The higher order maximum principle and its application to singular extremals, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 15 (1977), 256–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9].
    A. Krener, H. Schättler, The structure of small-time reachable sets in low dimensions, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 27 (1989), 120–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10].
    C. Lobry, Contrôlabilité des Systèmes nonlinéaires, SIAM J. Control 8 (1970), 573–605.Google Scholar
  11. [11].
    L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyansky, R. V. Gamkrelidze, and E. F. Mishchenko, “Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes,” Wiley Interscience, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
  12. [12].
    H. Schättler, On the local Structure of time-optimal bang-bang trajectories in R3, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 26 (1988), 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. Schättler, A local feedback synthesis of time-optimal stabilizing controls in dimension three,Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems (MCSS) (to appear).Google Scholar
  14. [14].
    H. Sussmann, A bang-bang theorem with bounds on the number of switchings, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 17 (1979), 629–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15].
    H. Sussmann, Envelopes, conjugate points and optimal bang-bang extremals,in: Proceedings of the 1985 Paris Conference on Nonlinear Systems (1986), M. Fliess, M. Hazewinkel (Eds.) Reidel Publishing Co., The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  16. [16].
    H. Sussmann, The structure of time-optimal trajectories for single-input systems in the plane: the C°O nonsingular case, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 25 (1987), 433–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17].
    H. Sussmann, The structure of time-optimal trajectories for single-input systems in the plane: the general real analytic case,SIAM J. Control and Optimization 25 (1987), 869–904.Google Scholar
  18. [18].
    H. Sussmann, Regular synthesis for time-optimal control of single-input real analytic systems in the plane, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 25 (1987), 1145–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Sussmann, Envelopes, high-order optimality conditions and Lie brackets,Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Decision and Control (December 19890107–1112, Tampa, Florida.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heinz Schättler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Systems Science and MathematicsWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations