Skip to main content

Ocular Dominance, Accommodation, and the Interocular Suppression of Blur in Monovision

  • Chapter
Presbyopia Research

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Vision Research ((PIVR))

  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally., large amounts of anisometropia are considered an obstacle for normal binocular vision, and clinicians strive to equate the visual acuity in the two eyes with optimal refractive correction. Anisometropia could depress binocular measures of visual acuity if the blurred image of the ametropic eye reduced the contrast of the eye with less ametropia. Anisometropic blur also produces a marked elevation of the stereoscopic depth threshold, which is considerably greater than the threshold elevation produced by equal blurring of the two ocular images (Lit, 1968; Peters, 1969; Ong and Burley., 1972; Levy and Glick, 1974; Goodwin and Romano, 1985; Lovasik and Szymkiw, 1985; Schor and Heckmann, 1989). Finally., anisometropia presents an ambiguous stimulus to accommodation whenever the test target is proximal to the unequal far points of the two eyes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abadi, R., 1967, Induction masking—a study of some inhibitory interactions during dichoptic viewing, Vision Res. 16:269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atchison, D. A., Smith, G., and Efron, N., 1979, The effect of pupil size on visual acuity in uncorrected and corrected myopia, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 56:315–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R., Brown, B., and Garner, L., 1983, Time course and variability of dark focus, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24:1528–1531.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berardi, N., Galk, L. L., Maffei, L., and Siliprandi, R., 1986, Binocular suppression in cortical neurones, Exp. Brain Res. 63:581–584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borish, I. M., 1970, Clinical Refraction, 3rd ed., Professional Press, Chicago, pp. 173–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, D., 1856, The Stereoscope, Its HistorY., Theory and Constructing, J. Murray., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F., 1957, The depth of field of the human eye, Optic Acta 4:157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F., and Gregory, M., 1960, Effect of size of pupil on visual acuitY., Nature 187:1121–1123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A., 1936, The dependence of pupil size upon external light stimulus under static and variable conditions, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol] 121:376–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, P., 1988, Potential range of clear vision in monovision, J. Am. Opt. Assoc. 59:203–205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahle, M., 1982, Binocular rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequencY., Vision Res. 22:787–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, G. A., 1969, Geometrical Optics, Chilton, New York, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R.T., and Romano, P. E., 1985, Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26:917–923.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, D. A., Hines, C., and Schivartz, F., 1986, Suppression behavior analyzed as a function of monovision addition power, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 63:198–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H., 1962, Treatise on Physiological Optics (J. P. C. Southall, ed.), Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B., and Miller, J., 1975, Independent spatial-frequency-tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalr Y., Perception 4:125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, W. L., and Lachance, A., 1983, Stereoscopic acuity with induced refractive errors, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 60:509–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N. S., and Glick, E. B., 1974, Stereoscopic perception and Snellen visual acuit Y., Am. J. Ophthalmol. 78:722–724.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lit, A., 1968, Presentation of experimental data, J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 39:1098–1099.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loshin, D. S., Loshin, M. S., and Comer, G., 1982, Binocular summation with monovision contact lens correction for presbyopia, Int. Contact Lens Clin. 9:161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovasik, J. V., and Szymkiw, M., 1985, Effects of aniScikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance and pupil size on stereopsis, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26:741–750.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, E., and Erickson, P., 1988, Stereopsis in presbyopes wearing monovision and simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 65:619–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLendon, J. H., Burcham, J. L., and Pheiffer, C. H., 1968, Presbyopic patterns and single vision contact lenses II, South J. Optom. 10:7–12,31,36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, K. N., and Groch, J., 1956, Stereopsis and unequal luminosities in the two eyes, Am. Arch. Ophthalmol. 54:878–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, K. N., and Schwartz, J. T., 1959, Depth of focus of the human eye, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 49:273–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, J., and Burley, W. S., 1972, Effect of induced anisometropia an depth perception, Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 49:333–335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H. B., 1969, The influence of anisometropia an stereosen-sitivitY., Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 46:120–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Randle, R. J., 1970, Volitional control of visual accommodation, in: Adaptation and Acclimatization in Aerospace Medicine (H. J. Grunhofer, ed.), Garmisch-Partenkirchen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, C. M., and Erickson, P., 1988, Patterns of binocular suppression and accommodation in monovision, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 65:853–861.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, C. M., and Heckmann, T., 1989, Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: Effects on stereopsis and fusion, Vision Res. 29:837–847.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, C. M., and Howarth, P., 1986, Suprathreshold stereo-depth matches as a function of contrast and spatial frequenc Y., Perception 15:249–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, C. M., Kotulak, J. C., and Tsuetaki, T., 1986, Adaption of tonic accommodation reduces accommodative lag and is masked in darkness, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vision Sci. 27:820–827.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, C.M., Landsman, L., and Erickson, P., 1987, Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 64:723–730.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, C. M., Wood, I. C., and Ogawa, J., 1984, Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis, Vision Res. 24:573–578.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J., and Charman, W. N., 1975, The depth of focus of the human eye for Snellen letters, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 52:3–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, J. M., 1975, The effect of pupil size on grating detection at various contrast levels, Vision Res. 15:645–648.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schor, C., Erickson, P. (1991). Ocular Dominance, Accommodation, and the Interocular Suppression of Blur in Monovision. In: Obrecht, G., Stark, L.W. (eds) Presbyopia Research. Perspectives in Vision Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2131-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2131-7_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3217-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2131-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics