Advertisement

Justice and the Allocation of Health Care Resources

  • Christine K. Cassel
  • Ruth B. Purtilo

Abstract

This book thoroughly addresses problems confronting elderly individuals, particularly with respect to their health care problems. In this chapter we draw on such considerations but focus on the additional challenges created by acknowledging that elderly persons as a group are contenders for society’s inevitably limited resources. One goal of a good society is to arrive at an approach to the allocation of scarce resources that takes into account the unique values and goals of individuals while supporting fairness overall. But whenever prized resources are in limited supply, groups generally viewed favorably, with sympathy, may become viewed as competitors, or even threats, to other groups. It follows that elderly persons may come to be viewed as an economic threat under current circumstances, with the outcome being less than our society’s highest ideals and values would support. To understand why this can happen and how it can be avoided requires a careful evaluation of priorities, values, and trends.

Keywords

Distributive Justice Health Care Resource Dependency Ratio Normal Life Span Military Spending 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aristotle; Ross WD, trans. Nichomachean Ethics Book V. Vol 9 in The Works of Aristotle. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1925Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kingson ER, Hirshorn Ba, Cornman JM. The Ties That Bind: The Interdependence of Generations. Report from the Gerontological Society of America. Washington, DC: Seven Lock Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniels N. Just Health Care. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morgan J.N. The redistribution of income by families and institutions and emergency help patterns. In: Duncan GJ, Morgan JN, eds. Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of American Progress. Vol 10: Analyses of the First Thirteen Years of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research; 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S, Writing Committee of the Working Group on Program Design. A national health program for the United States: a physicians’ proposal. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 102–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    US Bureau of the Census. Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, and Race: 1983 to 2080. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1984. Current Population Reports, P-25, No. 952.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Callahan D. Setting Limits. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster Inc Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alva Myrdal Report: Towards Equality. Stockholm, Sweden Bok Forlaget Prisma; 1971Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Healthy People: The Surgeon General’s Report on Health Promotion and Diseases Prevention. Washington DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1979.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brandt RB. Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 1959.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Urban Institute. Executive Summary of the Comprehensive Needs Study of Individuals with the Most Severe Handicaps. Contract No. SR-74–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine K. Cassel
  • Ruth B. Purtilo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations