Advertisement

Competitive Situations with Two or More Participants

  • K. J. Radford

Abstract

In Chapters 5 and 6, the discussion centred on situations in which individuals were contemplating joint ventures or were members of a group faced with a choice between alternatives. In all the situations treated in these chapters the assumption was made that, despite some differences in objectives, the participants placed considerable value on their joint participation in a venture or on their membership of a group. While some conflicts might have arisen between the interests of the participants, the emphasis was on a cooperative resolution of the problem rather than on the competition between the participants.

Keywords

Mixed Strategy Pure Strategy Decision Situation Prefer Outcome Competitive Situation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., 77:eory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed., Princeton University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H., Games and Decisions, Wiley, 1957.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellsberg, D., “Theory of the Reluctant Duelist,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 46, 1956, pp. 909–23.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan, “The Final Problem,” in The Complete Sherlock Holmes Short Stories, John Murray, London 1928, pp. 536–556.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Howard, Nigel. Paradoxes of Rationality, MIT Press, 1971, p. 152.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, Wayne. Decision Theory and Human Behavior, Wiley, 1971, pp. 282–286.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H. op cit.,pp. 94–111.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howard, Nigel. op cit.,pp. 44–48.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rappoport, Anatol. Two Person Game Theory, University of Michigan, 1966, pp. 128–144.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, Wayne. op cit.,pp. 291–297.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allison, G.T. Essence of Decision, Little, Brown and Company, 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Proper Way to Behave, The Economist,July 4, 1987, pp. 83–86.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Economist,Nov. 9,1985, pp. 100–101.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Axelrod R.M., The Evolution of Cooperation,Basic Books, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Radford
    • 1
  1. 1.York UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations