Skip to main content

Ureteroscopy at a Lithotripsy Center

  • Chapter
Shock Wave Lithotripsy 2

Abstract

All cases involving ureteroscopy for the period of January 1, 1987, to January 1, 1988, were retrospectively reviewed. Of 97 total cases, 96 were performed with a 9.5 Fr. rigid ureteroscope. The reasons for ureteroscopy varied, including attempted basket extraction of a lower ureteral calculus (63%), evaluation of a non-negotiable ureter (13%), location of the calculus (8%), and retrieval of migrated double-J ureteral stent (5%). The treatment site was the lower ureter in 78% of cases.

The mean time for treatment was 55 minutes (range, 9 to 207 minutes). Postoperative ureteral stents were used in 75% of cases. The stents were left indwelling for various periods of time, depending on the original pathology and the judgment of the surgeon as to the degree of ureteral trauma. The mean calculous diameter successfully removed with basket extraction was 6.2 mm (range, 2 mm to 18 mm). Treatment was successful in 55% of cases. Of 31 unsuccessful cases, the most common problems encountered were inability to engage stone with the basket (11 cases), inability to negotiate ureteral orifice (7 cases), inability to visualize the calculus (6 cases), and extrusion of calculus outside the ureteral lumen (2 cases). The latter two cases were the only significant complications associated with this procedure reported during this period.

Ureteroscopy has been an important and useful tool in this active lithotripsy center. It has proven to be most effective in the diagnosis and treatment of lower ureteral pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. El-Kappany H, Gaballah MA, Ghoneim MA: Rigid ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteric calculi: experience in 120 cases. Br J Urol 58: 499, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keating MA, Heney NM, Young 1–1H1, et al: Ureteroscopy: the initial experience. J Urol 135: 689, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kramolowsky EV and Clayman RV: Treatment of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures. Urol Clin N Am 15: 415, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaker, D.L., Carey, P.O., Jenkins, A.D. (1989). Ureteroscopy at a Lithotripsy Center. In: Lingeman, J.E., Newman, D.M. (eds) Shock Wave Lithotripsy 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2054-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2052-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics